Suppr超能文献

在一项食欲性特征负性辨别学习任务中操纵前额叶活动和多巴胺D1受体信号传导的影响。

Effects of manipulating prefrontal activity and dopamine D1 receptor signaling in an appetitive feature-negative discrimination learning task.

作者信息

Hock Rebecca M, Owusu-Amoah Naana, Waite Lauren, Muir Charlotte, Stevenson Carl W, Bonardi Charlotte, Cassaday Helen J

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Nottingham.

School of Physiology, Pharmacology, and Neuroscience, University of Bristol.

出版信息

Behav Neurosci. 2024 Dec;138(6):420-432. doi: 10.1037/bne0000603. Epub 2024 Sep 19.

Abstract

Healthy cognition requires inhibitory modulation of associative learning; conversely, impaired inhibitory discrimination is implicated in behavioral disorders. The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and its dopamine innervation are key to understanding inhibition and impulsivity. We therefore examined the role of prelimbic and infralimbic cortices in within-subjects appetitive feature-negative learning using microinfusions of (a) the gamma-aminobutyric acid-A receptor agonist muscimol (0.25 μg in 1.0 μl; = 35), (b) the dopamine D1 receptor agonist SKF-81297 (0.1 μg in 1.0 μl; = 33), and (c) the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist SCH-23390 (5 μg in 1.0 μl; = 35). A conditioned stimulus (CS) was followed by food, but on trials on which the CS (A+) was compounded with the inhibitory cue (AX-), the food delivery was canceled. Difference scores (CS-preCS responding) were used to measure learning. All three experiments showed the feature-negative discrimination (A+/AX-), as decreased responding to AX- versus A+. This discrimination was reduced but preserved following muscimol infusions in Experiment 1. Similarly, in Experiments 2 and 3, infusions of SKF-81297 and SCH-23390 were both without effect on the acquisition of the discrimination. Like muscimol, SCH-23390 reduced difference score responding, consistent with nonspecific effects on the (expression of) learning. Thus, there was no evidence to suggest that inactivation of prelimbic or infralimbic cortices impaired feature-negative discrimination learning and no evidence for dopaminergic modulation of such learning in the medial prefrontal cortex either. These results are discussed in the context of the nonspecific effects of the infusions and the overall inconsistent performance in summation and retardation tests of conditioned inhibition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

健康的认知需要对联想学习进行抑制性调节;相反,抑制性辨别受损与行为障碍有关。内侧前额叶皮质(mPFC)及其多巴胺神经支配是理解抑制和冲动的关键。因此,我们使用微量注射(a)γ-氨基丁酸-A受体激动剂蝇蕈醇(1.0微升中含0.25微克;n = 35)、(b)多巴胺D1受体激动剂SKF-81297(1.0微升中含0.1微克;n = 33)和(c)多巴胺D1受体拮抗剂SCH-23390(1.0微升中含5微克;n = 35),研究了前边缘皮质和下边缘皮质在受试者内食欲性特征负性学习中的作用。一个条件刺激(CS)之后会有食物,但在CS(A+)与抑制性线索(AX-)复合的试验中,食物发放被取消。差异分数(CS减去CS前反应)用于测量学习。所有三个实验都显示了特征负性辨别(A+/AX-),即对AX-的反应比对A+的反应减少。在实验1中,蝇蕈醇注射后这种辨别能力降低但仍保留。同样,在实验2和3中,SKF-81297和SCH-23390的注射对辨别能力的获得均无影响。与蝇蕈醇一样,SCH-23390降低了差异分数反应,这与对学习(表达)的非特异性影响一致。因此,没有证据表明前边缘皮质或下边缘皮质失活会损害特征负性辨别学习,也没有证据表明内侧前额叶皮质中多巴胺能对这种学习有调节作用。在注射的非特异性影响以及条件性抑制的总和与延迟测试中总体不一致的表现的背景下,对这些结果进行了讨论。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2024美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验