Suppr超能文献

对新冠病毒感染后患者队列进行问卷调查和多导睡眠图评估阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停。

Questionnaire and polysomnographic evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea in a cohort of post-COVID-19 patients.

机构信息

Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Sep 13;103(37):e38838. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038838.

Abstract

To evaluate the efficiency of 5 screening questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), OSA frequency, and the association between OSA and COVID-19 severity in recent COVID-19 cases, and to compare the use of the oxygen desaturation index (ODI) as an alternative measure for the respiratory disturbance index (RDI). This open cohort study recruited patients with recent COVID-19 (within 30-180 days) diagnosed using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Participants were screened for OSA using the following 5 sleep disorder questionnaires prior to undergoing type I polysomnography: the Sleep Apnea Clinical Score (SACS), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), STOP-Bang score, No-Apnea score, and Berlin questionnaire. Polysomnography revealed that 77.5% of the participants had OSA and that these patients exhibited higher COVID-19-related hospitalization (58%) than those exhibited by non-apneic patients. The Kappa coefficient showed reasonable agreement between RDI > 5/h and No-Apnea score, RDI > 15/h and Berlin questionnaire score, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale and STOP-Bang score, but only moderate agreement between RDI > 15/h and No-Apnea score. An OSA-positive No-Apnea score increased the specificity of the SACS to 100% when RDI > 5/h. The intraclass correlation coefficient showed 95.2% agreement between RDI > 5/h and ODI > 10/h. The sequential application of the No-Apnea score and SACS was the most efficient screening method for OSA, which had a moderately high incidence among the post-COVID-19 group. We demonstrated an association between OSA and COVID-19 related hospitalization and that ODI could be a simple method with good performance for diagnosing OSA in this population.

摘要

为了评估 5 种阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)筛查问卷、OSA 频率以及 OSA 与近期 COVID-19 病例严重程度之间的相关性,并比较使用氧减指数(ODI)作为呼吸干扰指数(RDI)替代指标的效果,本开放队列研究招募了最近确诊 COVID-19(30-180 天内)的患者,这些患者通过逆转录聚合酶链反应进行诊断。在进行 I 型多导睡眠图检查之前,使用以下 5 种睡眠障碍问卷对患者进行 OSA 筛查:睡眠呼吸暂停临床评分(SACS)、Epworth 嗜睡量表(ESS)、STOP-Bang 评分、无鼾症评分和柏林问卷。多导睡眠图显示,77.5%的参与者患有 OSA,与非鼾症患者相比,这些患者因 COVID-19 相关住院治疗的比例更高(58%)。Kappa 系数显示,RDI>5/h 与 No-Apnea 评分、RDI>15/h 与 Berlin 问卷评分、ESS 与 STOP-Bang 评分之间具有较好的一致性,而 RDI>15/h 与 No-Apnea 评分之间仅具有中等一致性。当 RDI>5/h 时,阳性的 No-Apnea 评分可将 SACS 的特异性提高至 100%。组内相关系数显示 RDI>5/h 与 ODI>10/h 之间具有 95.2%的一致性。No-Apnea 评分和 SACS 的序贯应用是 OSA 最有效的筛查方法,该方法在后 COVID-19 组中具有较高的发病率。我们证明了 OSA 与 COVID-19 相关住院之间的相关性,并且 ODI 可能是一种简单且性能良好的诊断该人群 OSA 的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a582/11404965/c2d3cd7f697a/medi-103-e38838-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验