Suppr超能文献

2019 - 2020年美国流感季期间,佐剂流感疫苗与非佐剂流感疫苗在有流感并发症风险因素的老年人中的相对有效性。

Relative effectiveness of adjuvanted versus non-adjuvanted influenza vaccines in older adults with risk factors for influenza complications during the 2019-2020 U.S. influenza season.

作者信息

Imran Mahrukh, Mills Caroline, McDermott Kimberly W, Dean Alex, Bogdanov Alina, McGovern Ian, Haag Mendel

机构信息

CSL Seqirus, Kirkland, Quebec, Canada.

Veradigm, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2024 Dec 2;42(26):126316. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126316. Epub 2024 Sep 19.

Abstract

This study estimated the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of the MF59®-adjuvanted trivalent influenza vaccine (aTIV) versus standard-dose nonadjuvanted egg-based quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIVe) for the prevention of influenza-related medical encounters (IRMEs), outpatient IRMEs, and influenza- and pneumonia-related hospitalizations during the 2019-2020 US influenza season among adults ≥65 years of age who had ≥1 high-risk condition. A secondary objective evaluated the rVE of aTIV versus QIVe in preventing these outcomes among older adults with specific high-risk conditions. This retrospective cohort study included US adults ≥65 years of age vaccinated with aTIV or QIVe between August 1, 2019, and January 31, 2020. Exposures, covariates, risk factors, and outcomes were captured from a linked dataset comprised of electronic health records (EHR) (Veradigm Network EHR) linked to insurance claims (Komodo Healthcare Map). A doubly robust approach was applied wherein multivariable-adjusted odds ratios were derived using inverse probability of treatment-weighted samples to calculate rVEs and 95 % confidence interval independently for individuals ≥1 high-risk condition and those with specific high-risk conditions. The study included 954,707 aTIV and 719,125 QIVe recipients. For all outcomes, aTIV was more effective than QIVe among adults ≥65 years of age who had ≥1 high-risk condition (any IMRE: 23.6 % [20.9 %-26.1 %]), outpatient IRME: 23.3 % [20.4 %-26.1 %], and influenza- or pneumonia-related hospitalizations: 19.0 % [16.3 %-21.6 %]), during the 2019-2020 influenza season. Similarly, aTIV was more effective than QIVe at preventing outcomes among individuals with specific high-risk conditions except for body mass index ≥40. This study demonstrated higher effectiveness of aTIV versus QIVe in preventing any IRMEs, outpatient IRMEs, and influenza- or pneumonia-related hospitalizations among adults ≥65 years of age who had ≥1 high-risk condition.

摘要

本研究评估了MF59®佐剂三价流感疫苗(aTIV)与标准剂量非佐剂鸡蛋基四价流感疫苗(QIVe)在预防2019 - 2020年美国流感季节期间≥65岁且患有≥1种高危状况的成年人的流感相关医疗就诊(IRME)、门诊IRME以及流感和肺炎相关住院方面的相对疫苗效力(rVE)。次要目标是评估aTIV与QIVe在预防患有特定高危状况的老年人的这些结局方面的rVE。这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2019年8月1日至2020年1月31日期间接种aTIV或QIVe的≥65岁美国成年人。暴露因素、协变量、风险因素和结局从一个由与保险理赔(Komodo Healthcare地图)相链接的电子健康记录(EHR)(Veradigm网络EHR)组成的关联数据集中获取。应用了双重稳健方法,其中使用治疗加权样本的逆概率独立计算≥1种高危状况个体和患有特定高危状况个体的rVE和95%置信区间,得出多变量调整后的比值比。该研究纳入了954,707名aTIV接种者和719,125名QIVe接种者。对于所有结局,在2019 - 2020年流感季节期间,aTIV在≥65岁且患有≥1种高危状况的成年人中比QIVe更有效(任何IMRE:23.6% [20.9% - 26.1%]),门诊IRME:23.3% [20.4% - 26.1%],以及流感或肺炎相关住院:19.0% [16.3% - 21.6%])。同样,除了体重指数≥40的个体外,aTIV在预防患有特定高危状况个体的结局方面比QIVe更有效。这项研究表明,aTIV在预防≥65岁且患有≥1种高危状况的成年人的任何IRME、门诊IRME以及流感或肺炎相关住院方面比QIVe更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验