Suppr超能文献

老年人中强化流感疫苗对预防流感住院的作用:一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析。

Protection against influenza hospitalizations from enhanced influenza vaccines among older adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Ferdinands J M, Blanton L H, Alyanak E, Chung J R, Trujillo L, Taliano J, Morgan R L, Fry A M, Grohskopf L A

机构信息

Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Office of Science Quality and Library Services, Office of Science, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Dec;72(12):3875-3889. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19176. Epub 2024 Sep 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Influenza vaccines are available to help protect persons aged ≥65 years, who experience thousands of influenza hospitalizations annually. Because some influenza vaccines may work better than others, we sought to assess benefit of high-dose (HD), adjuvanted (ADJ), and recombinant (RIV) influenza vaccines ("enhanced influenza vaccines") compared with standard-dose unadjuvanted influenza vaccines (SD) and with one another for prevention of influenza-associated hospitalizations among persons aged ≥65 years.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane Library to identify randomized or observational studies published between January 1990 and October 2023 and reporting relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of HD, ADJ, or RIV for prevention of influenza-associated hospitalizations among adults aged ≥65 years. We extracted study data, assessed risk of bias, and conducted random-effects network meta-analysis and meta-regression.

RESULTS

We identified 32 studies with 90 rVE estimates from five randomized and 27 observational studies (71,459,918 vaccinated participants). rVE estimates varied across studies and influenza seasons. Pooled rVE from randomized studies was 20% (95% CI -54 to 59) and 25% (95% CI -19 to 53) for ADJ and HD compared with SD, respectively; rVE was 6% (95% CI -109 to 58) for HD compared with ADJ; these differences were not statistically significant. In observational studies, ADJ, HD, and RIV conferred modestly increased protection compared with SD (rVE ranging from 10% to 19%), with no significant differences between HD, ADJ, and RIV. With enhanced vaccines combined, rVE versus SD was 18% (95% CI 3 to 32) from randomized and 11% (95% CI 8 to 14) from observational evidence. Meta-regression of observational studies suggested that those requiring laboratory confirmation of influenza reported greater benefit of enhanced vaccines.

CONCLUSIONS

HD, ADJ, and RIV provided stronger protection than SD against influenza hospitalizations among older adults. No differences in benefit were observed in comparisons of enhanced influenza vaccines with one another.

摘要

背景

流感疫苗可用于帮助保护65岁及以上的人群,这些人每年有数千人次因流感住院。由于某些流感疫苗可能比其他疫苗效果更好,我们试图评估高剂量(HD)、佐剂(ADJ)和重组(RIV)流感疫苗(“强化流感疫苗”)与标准剂量无佐剂流感疫苗(SD)相比,以及它们相互之间预防65岁及以上人群流感相关住院的效果。

方法

我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆,以识别1990年1月至2023年10月期间发表的随机或观察性研究,这些研究报告了HD、ADJ或RIV预防65岁及以上成年人流感相关住院的相对疫苗效力(rVE)。我们提取了研究数据,评估了偏倚风险,并进行了随机效应网络荟萃分析和荟萃回归。

结果

我们从5项随机研究和27项观察性研究(71459918名接种疫苗的参与者)中确定了32项研究,有90个rVE估计值。rVE估计值在不同研究和流感季节有所不同。与SD相比,随机研究中ADJ和HD的合并rVE分别为20%(95%CI -54至59)和25%(95%CI -19至53);HD与ADJ相比的rVE为6%(95%CI -109至58);这些差异无统计学意义。在观察性研究中,与SD相比,ADJ、HD和RIV提供的保护略有增加(rVE范围为10%至19%),HD、ADJ和RIV之间无显著差异。综合强化疫苗来看,随机研究中与SD相比的rVE为18%(95%CI 3至32),观察性证据中的rVE为11%(95%CI 8至14)。观察性研究的荟萃回归表明,那些需要实验室确诊流感的人报告强化疫苗的益处更大。

结论

HD、ADJ和RIV在预防老年人流感住院方面比SD提供了更强的保护。在强化流感疫苗相互比较中未观察到益处差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70d6/11637296/09c47526aa8f/JGS-72-3875-g004.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验