First consensus development conference in United Kingdom: on coronary artery bypass grafting. I. Views of audience, panel, and speakers.
作者信息
Stocking B
出版信息
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Sep 14;291(6497):713-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6497.713.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
First consensus development conference in United Kingdom: on coronary artery bypass grafting. I. Views of audience, panel, and speakers.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Sep 14;291(6497):713-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6497.713.
2
First consensus development conference in United Kingdom: on coronary artery bypass grafting. II. Commentary by chairman of conference.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Sep 14;291(6497):716-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6497.716.
3
Consensus development conference: coronary artery bypass grafting.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Dec 1;289(6457):1527-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6457.1527.
4
NIH Consensus Development Conference summary. Coronary artery bypass surgery: scientific and clinical aspects.
J Tenn Med Assoc. 1982 May;75(5):335-8.
5
Consensus development conference on coronary artery bypass surgery: introduction.
Circulation. 1982 Jun;65(7 Pt 2):1-2.
6
Looking to consensus to solve problems of heart surgery.
Health Soc Serv J. 1985 Feb 7;95(4934):159-60.
7
National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference statement on coronary bypass surgery: scientific and clinical aspects.
Circulation. 1982 Jun;65(7 Pt 2):126-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.65.7.126.
8
Comparative economic analyses of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Mar;125(3):618-24. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2003.14.
9
Economics of coronary artery bypass grafting.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Aug 3;291(6491):326-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6491.326.
10
Coronary artery bypass grafting for the reduction of mortality: an analysis of the trials.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Nov 3;289(6453):1166-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6453.1166.
引用本文的文献
1
Researching the Appropriateness of Care in the Complementary and Integrative Health Professions: Part I.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018 Nov-Dec;41(9):800-806. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.11.002. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
2
Impact of varying panel membership on ratings of appropriateness in consensus panels: a comparison of a multi- and single disciplinary panel.
Health Serv Res. 1995 Oct;30(4):577-91.
3
The consensus process and evidence dissemination.
CMAJ. 1986 Jun 15;134(12):1340-1.
4
Consensus on prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer: implications for general practice.
Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Dec;40(341):483-4.
Zotero 插件