Institute of Public Health, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Alpenquai 4, Lucerne, 6005, Switzerland.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):2559. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20098-4.
Promoting older workers' health in the context of increasing labor force participation and skill shortages is crucial. Examining job resource profiles offers a promising approach to understanding how to promote and maintain the health of older workers within the workplace. However, it is unclear how different job resources interact within distinct worker subgroups. Thus, this study explores the association between the job resource profiles of distinct subgroups and various health indicators among older workers in Europe.
Data from 4,079 older workers (age range: 50-60 years, 57% female) from waves 6 and 8 of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) were analyzed. Latent profile analysis was employed to identify distinct job resource profiles using social support, recognition, job promotion, autonomy, and development opportunities. Associations between these profiles and various health indicators were examined, alongside the sociodemographic and socioeconomic characteristics associated with each profile.
Four distinct job resource profiles emerged: (I) average job resource workers (n = 2170, 53%), (II) high social job resource workers (n = 983, 24%), (III) low job resource workers (n = 538, 13%), and (IV) autonomous decision-making workers (n = 388, 10%). Workers in the (II) high social job resource profile had the highest socioeconomic status and reported the best self-perceived health, lowest depressive symptoms, and fewest limitations and chronic diseases. Conversely, workers in the (III) low job resource profile had the second-lowest socioeconomic status and reported the poorest health outcomes. Surprisingly, older workers with high autonomy (profile IV) had the lowest socioeconomic status and the second worst self-perceived health. This may be because they perceive themselves as autonomous while lacking support and recognition.
There is wide variation in the level and composition of resources available to older workers in the workplace. The most vulnerable subgroups, such as low job resource workers (profile III) and autonomous decision-making workers (profile IV), could benefit from tailored workplace health promotion interventions, such as support from supervisors or peers. Strengthening older workers' job resources, including social support and recognition, can improve their health and contribute to them remaining in the workforce.
在劳动力参与率和技能短缺不断增加的情况下,促进老年工人的健康至关重要。考察工作资源配置情况为了解如何在工作场所促进和维持老年工人的健康提供了一个有前途的方法。然而,不同的工作资源在不同的工人亚组中如何相互作用尚不清楚。因此,本研究探讨了在欧洲,不同亚组的工作资源配置与老年工人各种健康指标之间的关联。
使用欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查(SHARE)第 6 波和第 8 波的数据,对 4079 名年龄在 50-60 岁之间的老年工人(女性占 57%)进行了分析。使用社会支持、认可、职务晋升、自主权和发展机会等指标,采用潜在剖面分析来确定不同的工作资源配置情况。并考察了这些配置情况与各种健康指标之间的关联,以及与每种配置情况相关的社会人口学和社会经济特征。
出现了四个不同的工作资源配置情况:(一)平均工作资源工人(n=2170,53%);(二)高社会工作资源工人(n=983,24%);(三)低工作资源工人(n=538,13%);(四)自主决策工人(n=388,10%)。(二)高社会工作资源配置情况的工人社会经济地位最高,自我报告的健康状况最好,抑郁症状最低,限制和慢性疾病最少。相比之下,(三)低工作资源配置情况的工人社会经济地位最低,健康状况最差。令人惊讶的是,拥有高度自主权的老年工人(配置四)的社会经济地位最低,自我健康状况第二差。这可能是因为他们认为自己有自主权,而缺乏支持和认可。
老年工人在工作场所可获得的资源水平和构成存在很大差异。最脆弱的亚组,如低工作资源工人(配置三)和自主决策工人(配置四),可以从定制的工作场所健康促进干预措施中受益,例如来自主管或同事的支持。加强老年工人的工作资源,包括社会支持和认可,可以改善他们的健康状况,并有助于他们留在劳动力队伍中。