Suppr超能文献

评价 Fränkel 手法在检测 Angle Ⅱ类 1 分类错颌中下颌功能偏斜中的诊断能力。

Evaluation of the diagnostic ability of the Fränkel manoeuvre to detect the contributing jaw in angle class II division 1 malocclusion.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, J. Lukšos-Daumanto Str. 6, Kaunas, LT-50106, Lithuania.

Faculty of Odontology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, J. Lukšos-Daumanto Str. 2, Kaunas, Lithuania.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):1113. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04789-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A correct diagnosis of patients with an Angle Class II malocclusion is needed to guide treatment decisions toward the contributing jaw and to achieve better treatment outcomes. The aim of the study is to evaluate the diagnostic potential of the Fränkel manoeuvre (FM) for detecting the components determining sagittal discrepancy in Angle Class II division 1.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Anonymous questionnaires containing photographs were distributed totwo groups: general practitioner (GP) dentists and orthodontists. The level of the patient's profile aesthetics before (T0) and after (T1) the manoeuvre was determined using a 100 mm visual analog scale, and the 'profile improvement' score was defined as T1 minus T0. The diagnostic ability of the FM was calculated by comparison with lateral cephalometry as a reference standard using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 102 respondents participated in the survey; 40 were orthodontists, and 62 were GP dentists. According to the post-FM images, the "profile improvement" score (T1-T0) was significantly greater in patients with mandibular retrusion than in those with maxillary protrusion (p < 0.05). The predictive power of FM, coinciding with the area under the ROC curve, was 0.62 for GPs and 0.78 for orthodontists.

CONCLUSIONS

The FM method is a useful and accurate tool for diagnosing skeletal Angle Class II malocclusion etiology (mandibular retrusion or maxillary protrusion), especially when used by orthodontists.

摘要

背景

正确诊断安氏Ⅱ类错(牙合)患者,有助于指导针对主要致病颌骨的治疗决策,并获得更好的治疗效果。本研究旨在评估弗兰克尔(Fränkel)手法(FM)诊断安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类中矢状不调决定因素的能力。

材料和方法

向两组医生发放了包含照片的匿名问卷:全科牙医(GP)和正畸医生。在操作前后(T0 和 T1)使用 100mm 视觉模拟量表评估患者侧貌美学的水平,“侧貌改善”评分定义为 T1-T0。通过与侧位头颅测量作为参考标准进行比较,使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析来计算 FM 的诊断能力。

结果

共有 102 名受访者参与了调查,其中 40 名是正畸医生,62 名是全科牙医。根据 FM 后的图像,下颌后缩患者的“侧貌改善”评分(T1-T0)明显大于上颌前突患者(p<0.05)。FM 的预测能力与 ROC 曲线下面积一致,全科牙医的为 0.62,正畸医生的为 0.78。

结论

FM 方法是一种有用且准确的工具,可用于诊断骨骼安氏Ⅱ类错(牙合)病因(下颌后缩或上颌前突),尤其是由正畸医生使用时。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验