• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强迫症的最小重要差异:成人双盲 SSRI 试验分析。

The minimal important difference in obsessive-compulsive disorder: An analysis of double-blind SSRI trials in adults.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Amsterdam Neuroscience Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 20;67(1):e53. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1768.

DOI:10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1768
PMID:39301594
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11457115/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The change in symptoms necessary to be clinically relevant in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is currently unknown. In this study, we aimed to create an empirically validated threshold for clinical significance or minimal important difference (MID).

METHODS

We analyzed individual participant data from short-term, double-blind, placebo-controlled registration trials of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in adult OCD patients. Data were collected from baseline to week 12. We used equipercentile linking to equate changes in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale to changes in the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS). We defined the MID as the YBOCS change linked to a CGI improvement of 3 (defined as "minimal improvement").

RESULTS

We included 7 trials with a total of 1216 patients. The CGI-scores and YBOCS were moderately to highly correlated. The MID corresponded to 4.9 YBOCS points (95% CI 4.4-5.4) for the full sample, or a 24% YBOCS-decrease compared to baseline. The MID varied with baseline severity, being lower in the group with mild symptoms and higher in the group with severe symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

By linking the YBOCS to the CGI-I, this is the first study to propose an MID in OCD trials. Having a clearly defined MID can guide future clinical research and help interpretation of efficacy of existing interventions. Our results are clinician-based; however, there is further need for patient-reported outcomes as anchor to the YBOCS.

摘要

背景

目前尚不清楚强迫症(OCD)中需要具有临床相关性的症状变化。在这项研究中,我们旨在创建一个经验验证的临床意义或最小重要差异(MID)阈值。

方法

我们分析了来自成人 OCD 患者短期、双盲、安慰剂对照的选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂注册试验的个体参与者数据。数据从基线收集到第 12 周。我们使用等百分位链接将临床总体印象量表(CGI)的变化与耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(YBOCS)的变化进行匹配。我们将 MID 定义为与 CGI 改善 3 分相关的 YBOCS 变化(定义为“最小改善”)。

结果

我们纳入了 7 项共纳入 1216 例患者的试验。CGI 评分和 YBOCS 之间存在中度至高度相关性。MID 对应于整个样本的 4.9 个 YBOCS 点(95%CI 4.4-5.4),或与基线相比 YBOCS 降低 24%。MID 随基线严重程度而变化,在症状较轻的组中较低,在症状较重的组中较高。

结论

通过将 YBOCS 与 CGI-I 相关联,这是第一项在 OCD 试验中提出 MID 的研究。有一个明确定义的 MID 可以指导未来的临床研究,并有助于解释现有干预措施的疗效。我们的结果是基于临床医生的,但进一步需要患者报告的结果作为 YBOCS 的基准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad7f/11457115/69107fd2c3e3/S0924933824017681_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad7f/11457115/82eab4b08380/S0924933824017681_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad7f/11457115/49169791ee02/S0924933824017681_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad7f/11457115/69107fd2c3e3/S0924933824017681_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad7f/11457115/82eab4b08380/S0924933824017681_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad7f/11457115/49169791ee02/S0924933824017681_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad7f/11457115/69107fd2c3e3/S0924933824017681_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
The minimal important difference in obsessive-compulsive disorder: An analysis of double-blind SSRI trials in adults.强迫症的最小重要差异:成人双盲 SSRI 试验分析。
Eur Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 20;67(1):e53. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1768.
2
Double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot trial of paliperidone augmentation in serotonin reuptake inhibitor-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder.帕利哌酮增效治疗五羟色胺再摄取抑制剂抵抗性强迫症的双盲、安慰剂对照、初步试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;74(6):e527-32. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12m08278.
3
A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of controlled-release fluvoxamine in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.一项关于控释氟伏沙明治疗强迫症患者疗效和安全性的双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2003 Jun;64(6):640-7. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v64n0604.
4
Ondansetron augmentation in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder who are inadequate responders to serotonin reuptake inhibitors: improvement with treatment and worsening following discontinuation.对于对5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂反应不足的强迫症患者,昂丹司琼增效治疗:治疗后改善,停药后恶化。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014 Mar;24(3):375-80. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.12.003. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
5
Defining response in clinical trials for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a signal detection analysis of the Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale.强迫症临床试验中反应的定义:耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表的信号检测分析
J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;66(12):1549-57. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v66n1209.
6
High-dose sertraline strategy for nonresponders to acute treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a multicenter double-blind trial.强迫症急性治疗无反应者的高剂量舍曲林策略:一项多中心双盲试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;67(1):15-22. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v67n0103.
7
Double-blind study of dextroamphetamine versus caffeine augmentation for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder.双盲研究:右旋苯丙胺与咖啡因增效治疗耐药性强迫症。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;70(11):1530-5. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04605. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
8
Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of topiramate augmentation in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder.双盲、安慰剂对照试验表明托吡酯可增强治疗抵抗性强迫症。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 May;72(5):716-21. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05266gre. Epub 2010 Aug 10.
9
Quality of life outcomes in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder: relationship to treatment response and symptom relapse.强迫症患者的生活质量结局:与治疗反应和症状复发的关系。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Jun;71(6):784-92. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05911blu. Epub 2010 May 4.
10
The impact of trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder on the treatment response of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.创伤和创伤后应激障碍对强迫症患者治疗反应的影响。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2010 Mar;260(2):91-9. doi: 10.1007/s00406-009-0015-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Does early non-improvement predict treatment failure in pharmacotherapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder? A diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis with individual participant data.强迫症药物治疗中早期无改善是否预示治疗失败?一项基于个体参与者数据的诊断试验准确性荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2025 Aug 15;55:e237. doi: 10.1017/S0033291725101335.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of study characteristics, methodological rigour and publication bias on efficacy of pharmacotherapy in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, placebo-controlled trials.研究特征、方法学严谨性和发表偏倚对强迫症药物治疗疗效的影响:随机、安慰剂对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Ment Health. 2024 Feb 12;27(1):e300951. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300951.
2
All cause and cause specific mortality in obsessive-compulsive disorder: nationwide matched cohort and sibling cohort study.强迫症的全因死亡率和死因特异性:全国匹配队列和同胞队列研究。
BMJ. 2024 Jan 17;384:e077564. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-077564.
3
Incidence of adverse events and comparative tolerability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors for the treatment of anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, and stress disorders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂和 5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂治疗焦虑、强迫症和应激障碍的不良事件发生率和相对耐受性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2023 Jul;53(9):3783-3792. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723001630. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
4
New Directions for Improving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Use in Clinical Care and Research.改善患者报告结局测量中最小临床重要差异的新方向,用于临床护理和研究。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Mar 1;149(3):276-277. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.4733.
5
Cyclic versus continuous deep brain stimulation in patients with obsessive compulsive disorder: A randomized controlled trial.强迫症患者的周期性与连续性深部脑刺激:一项随机对照试验。
Brain Stimul. 2023 Jan-Feb;16(1):82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.01.1664. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
6
Operational Definitions of Treatment Response and Remission in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Capture Meaningful Improvements in Everyday Life.在强迫症中,治疗反应和缓解的操作性定义可以捕捉到日常生活中的有意义的改善。
Psychother Psychosom. 2022;91(6):424-430. doi: 10.1159/000527115. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
7
Linkage of Young Mania Rating Scale to Clinical Global Impression Scale to Enhance Utility in Clinical Practice and Research Trials.将青年躁狂评定量表与临床总体印象量表相联系,以提高其在临床实践和研究试验中的实用性。
Pharmacopsychiatry. 2023 Jan;56(1):18-24. doi: 10.1055/a-1841-6672. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
8
What Is the Minimum Clinically Important Change in Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia? PANSS Based Analyses of a Phase III Clinical Trial.精神分裂症阴性症状的最小临床重要变化是什么?基于阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)对一项III期临床试验的分析。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 25;13:816339. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.816339. eCollection 2022.
9
Empirical severity benchmarks for obsessive-compulsive disorder across the lifespan.强迫症在整个生命周期中的经验性严重程度基准。
World Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;21(2):315-316. doi: 10.1002/wps.20984.
10
The utility of patient-reported outcome measures in mental health.患者报告结局指标在心理健康领域的效用。
World Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;21(1):56-57. doi: 10.1002/wps.20924.