• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将青年躁狂评定量表与临床总体印象量表相联系,以提高其在临床实践和研究试验中的实用性。

Linkage of Young Mania Rating Scale to Clinical Global Impression Scale to Enhance Utility in Clinical Practice and Research Trials.

作者信息

Samara Myrto T, Levine Stephen Z, Leucht Stefan

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larisa, Greece.

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Pharmacopsychiatry. 2023 Jan;56(1):18-24. doi: 10.1055/a-1841-6672. Epub 2022 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1055/a-1841-6672
PMID:35896419
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) is the gold standard to assess manic symptoms of bipolar disorder, yet the clinical meaning of scores is unknown. To clinically understand and interpret YMRS scores, we examined linkages between the total and change scores of YMRS with the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) ratings.

METHODS

Individual participant data (N=2,988) from eight randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were included. Data were collected at baseline and subsequent visits. Spearman's correlation coefficients ρ were computed, and equipercentile linking was implemented.

RESULTS

A YMRS score of 6 points corresponded approximately to 'borderline mentally ill,' 12 points to 'mildly ill,' 20 points to 'moderately ill,' 30 points to 'markedly ill,' 40 points to 'severely ill,' and 52 points to 'among the most extremely ill' patients on the CGI-S. A reduction of CGI-S by one point as well as 'minimally improved' on the CGI-I corresponded approximately to an absolute decrease of 4 to 8 YMRS points or a 21% to 29% reduction of YMRS baseline score whereas a reduction of CGI-S by two points and 'much improved' on the CGI-I corresponded to an absolute decrease of 10 to 15 points or a 42% to 53% reduction of YMRS baseline score.

DISCUSSION

The current study findings offer clinicians meaningful cutoff values to interpret YMRS scores. Moreover, these values contribute to the definition of treatment targets, response, remission, and entry criteria in mania trials.

摘要

引言

青年躁狂评定量表(YMRS)是评估双相情感障碍躁狂症状的金标准,但其分数的临床意义尚不清楚。为了从临床上理解和解释YMRS分数,我们研究了YMRS总分及变化分数与临床总体印象(CGI)评分之间的联系。

方法

纳入了八项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的个体参与者数据(N = 2988)。在基线和后续访视时收集数据。计算了Spearman相关系数ρ,并实施了等百分位链接。

结果

在CGI-S量表上,YMRS得分为6分大致对应“边缘性精神疾病”,12分对应“轻度疾病”,20分对应“中度疾病”,30分对应“重度疾病”,40分对应“极重度疾病”,52分对应“最极重度疾病”患者。CGI-S降低1分以及CGI-I上“稍有改善”大致对应YMRS绝对降低4至8分或YMRS基线分数降低21%至29%,而CGI-S降低2分以及CGI-I上“明显改善”对应YMRS绝对降低10至15分或YMRS基线分数降低42%至53%。

讨论

当前研究结果为临床医生提供了有意义的临界值来解释YMRS分数。此外,这些值有助于定义躁狂症试验中的治疗目标、反应、缓解和入组标准。

相似文献

1
Linkage of Young Mania Rating Scale to Clinical Global Impression Scale to Enhance Utility in Clinical Practice and Research Trials.将青年躁狂评定量表与临床总体印象量表相联系,以提高其在临床实践和研究试验中的实用性。
Pharmacopsychiatry. 2023 Jan;56(1):18-24. doi: 10.1055/a-1841-6672. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
2
Young Mania Rating Scale: how to interpret the numbers? Determination of a severity threshold and of the minimal clinically significant difference in the EMBLEM cohort.Young Mania Rating Scale:如何解读这些数字?在 EMBLEM 队列中确定严重程度阈值和最小临床显著差异。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2013 Mar;22(1):46-58. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1379. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
3
The empirical redefinition of the psychometric criteria for remission in bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍缓解的心理测量标准的实证重新定义。
J Affect Disord. 2008 Feb;106(1-2):153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.06.011. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
4
Relationship between the clinical global impression of severity for schizoaffective disorder scale and established mood scales for mania and depression.精神分裂情感障碍临床整体印象严重程度量表与躁狂和抑郁的既定情绪量表之间的关系。
J Affect Disord. 2013 Aug 15;150(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.01.047. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
5
Early improvement as a predictor of acute treatment outcome in manic or mixed episodes in bipolar-1 disorder: a pooled, post hoc analysis from the asenapine development program.双相 1 型障碍躁狂或混合发作中早期改善可预测急性治疗结局:阿塞那平研发项目的一项汇总、事后分析。
J Affect Disord. 2013 Sep 25;150(3):745-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.01.024. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
6
Extended-release carbamazepine capsules as monotherapy in bipolar disorder : pooled results from two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.缓释卡马西平胶囊作为双相情感障碍的单一疗法:两项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的汇总结果
CNS Drugs. 2006;20(3):219-31. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200620030-00004.
7
Extended-release quetiapine as monotherapy for the treatment of adults with acute mania: a randomized, double-blind, 3-week trial.富马酸喹硫平缓释片单药治疗成人急性躁狂症的随机、双盲、3 周试验。
Clin Ther. 2011 Nov;33(11):1643-58. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.10.002. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
8
Assessing the severity of psychiatric disorders using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales: An equipercentile linking analysis.使用《国家健康结果量表》评估精神障碍的严重程度:等百分位链接分析。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2020 Dec;54(12):1192-1199. doi: 10.1177/0004867420963725. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
9
Placebo-controlled study of quetiapine monotherapy in ambulatory bipolar spectrum disorder with moderate-to-severe hypomania or mild mania.安慰剂对照研究喹硫平单药治疗伴有中重度轻躁狂或轻度躁狂的门诊双相情感障碍。
J Affect Disord. 2010 Jul;124(1-2):157-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.11.014. Epub 2009 Dec 5.
10
What does the MADRS mean? Equipercentile linking with the CGI using a company database of mirtazapine studies.MADRS是什么意思?使用米氮平研究的公司数据库将百分位数与CGI进行链接。
J Affect Disord. 2017 Mar 1;210:287-293. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.041. Epub 2016 Dec 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Colour vision impairments in bipolar disorder: A systematic review.双相情感障碍中的色觉障碍:一项系统综述。
Neurosci Appl. 2024 Mar 15;3:104057. doi: 10.1016/j.nsa.2024.104057. eCollection 2024.
2
Acoustic and Natural Language Markers for Bipolar Disorder: A Pilot, mHealth Cross-Sectional Study.双相情感障碍的声学和自然语言标记:一项移动健康横断面试点研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 16;9:e65555. doi: 10.2196/65555.
3
The minimal important difference in obsessive-compulsive disorder: An analysis of double-blind SSRI trials in adults.
强迫症的最小重要差异:成人双盲 SSRI 试验分析。
Eur Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 20;67(1):e53. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1768.
4
The effects of ketogenic metabolic therapy on mental health and metabolic outcomes in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a randomized controlled clinical trial protocol.生酮代谢疗法对精神分裂症和双相情感障碍患者心理健康及代谢指标的影响:一项随机对照临床试验方案
Front Nutr. 2024 Aug 21;11:1444483. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1444483. eCollection 2024.
5
Exploring the minimal important difference in the treatment of paediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder using selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.使用选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂探索小儿强迫症治疗中的最小重要差异。
BMJ Ment Health. 2024 Jun 19;27(1):e300999. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-300999.