Scharf S M, Heimer D, Walters M
Chest. 1985 Oct;88(4):586-93. doi: 10.1378/chest.88.4.586.
We evaluated isocapnic hyperventilation with room temperature gas (IHV) as a test of bronchial hyperreactivity and compared it with histamine challenge (HC) in three groups of subjects: normal subjects, known mild asthmatic patients, and patients referred to the pulmonary clinic for a chief complaint of dyspnea. Physical examination at the time of evaluation was negative in all subjects. When the criterion for a positive reaction to IHV was a decrease in FEV1 of 10 percent or greater, and the criterion for a positive reaction to HC was a PD20 (concentration of inhaled histamine necessary to decrease FEV1 by at least 20 percent) of less than 10 mg/ml, the specificity of both tests was 100 percent. The sensitivity of both tests as evaluated from the known asthmatic patients was also 100 percent. Among the dyspneic patients, eight of 30 reacted to both IHV and HC, two of 30 reacted to HC alone, and eight of 30 reacted to IHV alone. It was concluded that IHV compares favorably with HC as a test of bronchial hyperreactivity, patients with clinical histories highly suggestive for asthma might not need to undergo bronchial challenge testing, and neither HC nor IHV when used alone is able to identify all of the hyperreactive patients.
我们评估了用室温气体进行等碳酸血症性过度通气(IHV)作为支气管高反应性的一项检测,并将其与组胺激发试验(HC)在三组受试者中进行比较:正常受试者、已知的轻度哮喘患者以及因主要症状为呼吸困难而转诊至肺科门诊的患者。评估时所有受试者的体格检查均为阴性。当IHV阳性反应的标准为第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)下降10%或更多,而HC阳性反应的标准为使FEV1至少下降20%所需的吸入组胺浓度(PD20)小于10mg/ml时,两种检测的特异性均为100%。从已知哮喘患者评估得出的两种检测的敏感性也均为100%。在呼吸困难的患者中,30人中有8人对IHV和HC均有反应,30人中有2人仅对HC有反应,30人中有8人仅对IHV有反应。得出的结论是,作为支气管高反应性的一项检测,IHV与HC相比具有优势,有高度提示哮喘临床病史的患者可能无需进行支气管激发试验,并且单独使用HC或IHV均无法识别所有高反应性患者。