Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Glob Chang Biol. 2024 Sep;30(9):e17449. doi: 10.1111/gcb.17449.
Tropical forest photosynthesis can decline at high temperatures due to (1) biochemical responses to increasing temperature and (2) stomatal responses to increasing vapor pressure deficit (VPD), which is associated with increasing temperature. It is challenging to disentangle the influence of these two mechanisms on photosynthesis in observations, because temperature and VPD are tightly correlated in tropical forests. Nonetheless, quantifying the relative strength of these two mechanisms is essential for understanding how tropical gross primary production (GPP) will respond to climate change, because increasing atmospheric CO concentration may partially offset VPD-driven stomatal responses, but is not expected to mitigate the effects of temperature-driven biochemical responses. We used two terrestrial biosphere models to quantify how physiological process assumptions (photosynthetic temperature acclimation and plant hydraulic stress) and functional traits (e.g., maximum xylem conductivity) influence the relative strength of modeled temperature versus VPD effects on light-saturated GPP at an Amazonian forest site, a seasonally dry tropical forest site, and an experimental tropical forest mesocosm. By simulating idealized climate change scenarios, we quantified the divergence in GPP predictions under model configurations with stronger VPD effects compared with stronger direct temperature effects. Assumptions consistent with stronger direct temperature effects resulted in larger GPP declines under warming, while assumptions consistent with stronger VPD effects resulted in more resilient GPP under warming. Our findings underscore the importance of quantifying the role of direct temperature and indirect VPD effects for projecting the resilience of tropical forests in the future, and demonstrate that the relative strength of temperature versus VPD effects in models is highly sensitive to plant functional parameters and structural assumptions about photosynthetic temperature acclimation and plant hydraulics.
由于(1)随着温度升高而发生的生化响应,以及(2)与温度升高相关的水汽压亏缺(VPD)增大导致的气孔响应,热带森林的光合作用在高温下可能会下降。在观测中,区分这两种机制对光合作用的影响具有挑战性,因为在热带森林中,温度和 VPD 紧密相关。尽管如此,量化这两种机制的相对强度对于理解热带总初级生产力(GPP)将如何应对气候变化至关重要,因为大气 CO2浓度的增加可能部分抵消 VPD 驱动的气孔响应,但预计不会减轻温度驱动的生化响应的影响。我们使用了两个陆地生物群系模型,来量化生理过程假设(光合作用温度驯化和植物水力胁迫)和功能特性(例如,最大木质部导度)如何影响在亚马逊森林地点、季节性干燥热带森林地点和热带森林中尺度模型中,光照饱和 GPP 对模型模拟的温度与 VPD 效应的相对强度的影响。通过模拟理想化的气候变化情景,我们量化了在与直接温度效应相比 VPD 效应更强的模型配置下,GPP 预测的差异。与直接温度效应较强的假设相比,假设直接温度效应较强会导致升温下 GPP 下降幅度更大,而假设 VPD 效应较强会导致升温下 GPP 更具弹性。我们的研究结果强调了量化直接温度和间接 VPD 效应在预测未来热带森林的弹性方面的重要性,并表明模型中温度与 VPD 效应的相对强度对植物功能参数和光合作用温度驯化和植物水力学的结构假设高度敏感。