Lee Perl Han, Lee Chien-Hung, Ko Chih-Hung
Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Subst Use Misuse. 2025;60(1):12-19. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2024.2403118. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), categorizes betel-quid use disorder (BUD) under , and the diagnostic criteria used are adapted from those of Substance Use Disorder. Because different substances have different characteristics, an improved set of diagnostic criteria is required to better detect BUD.
The objective of this study was to examine the different measures of accuracy for DSM-5 BUD by using the addiction characteristics defined by the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM).
A certified psychiatrist conducted face-to-face diagnostic interviews. Questionnaires were administered to assess betel-quid use history, patterns of use, and dependence features. All betel-quid users were evaluated for BUD by using the DSM-5 criteria and addiction characteristics defined by the ASAM.
One of the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for BUD, namely , showed the lowest sensitivity of 0.14, lowest diagnostic accuracy of 0.63, and lowest diagnostic odds ratio of 2.61. Another DSM-5 diagnostic criterion, namely , had the lowest specificity of 0.49. The diagnostic threshold of five or more DSM-5 BUD criteria showed a sensitivity of 0.86 and a specificity of 0.97.
This study is the first to evaluate the different measures of accuracy for DSM-5 BUD. Given that each addictive substance has unique addictive characteristics, the composition and number of criteria for diagnosing DSM-5 BUD must be reconsidered.
《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM - 5)将槟榔使用障碍(BUD)归类于[具体类别未给出],所使用的诊断标准改编自物质使用障碍的标准。由于不同物质具有不同特性,需要一套改进的诊断标准来更好地检测槟榔使用障碍。
本研究的目的是通过使用美国成瘾医学协会(ASAM)定义的成瘾特征来检验DSM - 5槟榔使用障碍诊断标准的不同准确性测量方法。
一名认证精神科医生进行面对面诊断访谈。发放问卷以评估槟榔使用历史、使用模式和依赖特征。所有槟榔使用者均根据DSM - 5标准和ASAM定义的成瘾特征进行槟榔使用障碍评估。
DSM - 5槟榔使用障碍的诊断标准之一,即[具体标准未给出],显示出最低敏感性0.14、最低诊断准确性0.63和最低诊断比值比2.61。另一个DSM - 5诊断标准,即[具体标准未给出],具有最低特异性0.49。五个或更多DSM - 5槟榔使用障碍标准的诊断阈值显示敏感性为0.86,特异性为0.97。
本研究首次评估了DSM - 5槟榔使用障碍诊断标准的不同准确性测量方法。鉴于每种成瘾物质都有独特的成瘾特征,必须重新考虑DSM - 5槟榔使用障碍诊断标准的组成和数量。