Lu Frederick Q, Flores Michael W, Carson Nicholas J, Le Thomas, Cook Benjamin Lê
Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Health Equity Research Lab, Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, MA, USA.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Sep 20. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02177-9.
The objective of this study was to characterize and compare national estimates of mental healthcare use among White and Asian American groups to provide an update using post Affordable Care Act data.
We analyzed yearly cross-sectional data from the 2013-2019 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, including White (n = 112,590) and Asian American (n = 10,210) individuals, and examined rates of mental healthcare use for Asian (overall), Asian Indian, Chinese, Filipino, and Other Asian individuals relative to White individuals. Using multivariable logistic regression models and predictive margin methods, we estimated overall Asian disparities and Asian subgroup disparities compared to White group rates in mental health care (outpatient, specialty, psychotropic medication) among adults with and without elevated risk for mental illness. Regression models were adjusted for variables related to need for treatment, demographic, and socioeconomic status variables.
Asian individuals had lower rates of mental healthcare use than White individuals. Unadjusted results and adjusted regression model predictions are consistent in identifying wide disparities in mental health care treatment across risk for mental illness, Asian subgroups, and types of treatment.
Asian Americans have significantly lower rates of mental healthcare use than White Americans, even among those with elevated risk for mental illness. There is small variation by Asian subgroups but disparities persist across subgroups and types of treatment. Our results imply interventions are needed to improve linguistically, culturally, and ethnically tailored outreach and engagement in treatment services, as well as examining treatment and its effectiveness for Asian American individuals living with psychological distress.
本研究的目的是描述和比较白人群体和亚裔美国人群体在精神卫生保健使用方面的全国估计数据,以便利用《平价医疗法案》实施后的相关数据进行更新。
我们分析了2013 - 2019年医疗支出面板调查的年度横断面数据,其中包括白人个体(n = 112,590)和亚裔美国个体(n = 10,210),并考察了亚洲人(总体)、印度裔、华裔、菲律宾裔和其他亚裔个体相对于白人个体的精神卫生保健使用率。使用多变量逻辑回归模型和预测边际方法,我们估计了患有和未患有精神疾病高风险的成年人在精神卫生保健(门诊、专科、精神药物治疗)方面,与白人组相比的总体亚裔差异和亚裔亚组差异。回归模型针对与治疗需求、人口统计学和社会经济地位相关的变量进行了调整。
亚裔个体的精神卫生保健使用率低于白人个体。未调整结果和调整后的回归模型预测结果一致,表明在精神疾病风险、亚裔亚组和治疗类型方面,精神卫生保健治疗存在广泛差异。
亚裔美国人的精神卫生保健使用率显著低于白人美国人,即使在那些患有精神疾病高风险的人群中也是如此。亚裔亚组之间差异较小,但各亚组和治疗类型之间的差异仍然存在。我们的研究结果表明,需要采取干预措施,以改善在语言、文化和种族方面有针对性的外展服务,并提高对治疗服务的参与度,同时还需要研究针对有心理困扰的亚裔美国人的治疗方法及其效果。