Suppr超能文献

在一个全国代表性样本中,按种族/民族和性别划分的抑郁治疗偏好,以及过去医疗保健歧视经历与当前偏好之间的关联。

Depression treatment preferences by race/ethnicity and gender and associations between past healthcare discrimination experiences and present preferences in a nationally representative sample.

机构信息

AltaMed Institute for Health Equity, United States.

Health Equity Research Lab, Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, United States.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2020 May;253:112939. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112939. Epub 2020 Apr 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Depression treatment disparities are well documented. Differing treatment preferences across social groups have been suggested as a cause of these disparities. However, existing studies of treatment preferences have been limited to individuals currently receiving clinical care, and existing measures of depression treatment preferences have not accounted for factors that may be disproportionately relevant to the preferences of disparities populations. This study therefore aimed to assess depression treatment preferences by race/ethnicity and gender in a representative community sample, while accounting for access to healthcare, provider characteristics, and past experiences of discrimination in healthcare settings.

METHODS

We conducted a nationally representative study of individuals with depression in and out of clinical care. Treatment preferences (medication versus talk therapy) were elicited through a discrete choice experiment that accounted for tradeoffs with factors related to access and provider characteristics deemed relevant by community stakeholders. Past discrimination was assessed through questions about unfair treatment from medical providers and front desk staff due to personal characteristics (e.g., race, gender). We used conditional logit models to assess treatment preferences by race/ethnicity and gender and examined whether preferences were associated with past experiences of healthcare discrimination.

RESULTS

Non-Hispanic white respondents (OR-here, the odds of a talk therapy preference over the odds of a medication preference: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.99) and men (OR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.60, 0.96) preferred medication over talk therapy, while non-Hispanic black respondents, Hispanic respondents, and women did not prefer one over the other. Past discrimination in healthcare settings was associated with lower preferences for talk therapy and greater preferences for medication, particularly among non-Hispanic black respondents and women respondents.

CONCLUSIONS

Addressing previous methodological limitations yielded estimates for depression treatment preferences by race/ethnicity and gender that differed from past studies. Also, past discrimination in healthcare settings was associated with current treatment preferences.

摘要

背景

抑郁治疗的差异是有据可查的。不同社会群体的治疗偏好差异被认为是造成这些差异的原因之一。然而,现有的治疗偏好研究仅限于当前正在接受临床护理的个体,现有的抑郁治疗偏好衡量标准没有考虑到可能与差异人群的偏好差异更大的因素。因此,本研究旨在评估代表性社区样本中按种族/族裔和性别划分的抑郁治疗偏好,同时考虑获得医疗保健的机会、提供者特征以及在医疗保健环境中经历的歧视。

方法

我们对有临床和无临床抑郁的个体进行了一项全国性的代表性研究。通过离散选择实验来评估治疗偏好(药物治疗与谈话疗法),该实验考虑了与获得医疗保健的机会和被社区利益相关者认为与提供者特征相关的因素的权衡。过去的歧视是通过关于医疗提供者和前台工作人员因个人特征(如种族、性别)而不公平对待的问题来评估的。我们使用条件逻辑回归模型来评估种族/族裔和性别的治疗偏好,并检查偏好是否与过去的医疗保健歧视经历有关。

结果

非西班牙裔白人受访者(OR-这里是谈话疗法偏好的几率与药物治疗偏好的几率之比:0.80,95%置信区间:0.64,0.99)和男性(OR 0.76,95%置信区间:0.60,0.96)更喜欢药物治疗而非谈话疗法,而非西班牙裔黑人受访者、西班牙裔受访者和女性则没有表现出这种偏好。在医疗保健环境中经历过歧视与对谈话疗法的较低偏好和对药物治疗的更大偏好相关,尤其是在非西班牙裔黑人受访者和女性受访者中。

结论

解决以前的方法学限制产生了按种族/族裔和性别划分的抑郁治疗偏好的估计值,这些估计值与过去的研究不同。此外,医疗保健环境中的过去歧视与当前的治疗偏好有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验