• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参战和未参战的英国(前)军事男性人员感知社会支持与心理健康之间的关系:一项横断面研究。

The association between perceived social support and mental health in combat-injured and uninjured male UK (ex-)military personnel: A cross-sectional study.

机构信息

King's Centre for Military Health Research, King's College London, London, SE5 9RJ, UK.

Faculty of Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, SW3 6LR, UK.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 2024 Nov;179:167-174. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.09.017. Epub 2024 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.09.017
PMID:39303568
Abstract

Social support is a key determinant of mental health across multiple populations and contexts. Little is known about social support among UK (ex-)military personnel, especially those with combat injuries following deployment to Afghanistan. This study aimed to investigate the level of perceived social support and its associations with mental health among injured and uninjured UK (ex-)military personnel. An analysis of baseline data from the Armed Services Trauma Rehabilitation Outcome (ADVANCE) prospective cohort study was performed. A representative sample of male UK combat-injured personnel was compared with a frequency-matched sample of uninjured personnel. Validated questionnaires were completed including the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). MSPSS score was transformed using linear splines with a knot at ≥ 55. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined associations between perceived social support and mental health. In total, 521 combat-injured participants (137 with amputations) and 515 uninjured participants were included. Median MSPSS score was 65 (interquartile range [IQR] 54-74). Injured and uninjured participants reported similar MSPSS scores, as did those injured with amputations, and non-amputation injured participants. For each one unit increase in MSPSS score (for scores ≥55), the odds of post-traumatic stress disorder decreased (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91 to 0.96). No such association was found with MSPSS scores below 55 (AOR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.01). Similar results were observed for depression and anxiety. Perceived social support may be a target for intervention within this population, irrespective of injury status.

摘要

社会支持是多个群体和环境中心理健康的关键决定因素。人们对英国(前)军事人员的社会支持知之甚少,尤其是那些在部署到阿富汗后有战斗受伤的人员。本研究旨在调查受伤和未受伤的英国(前)军事人员的感知社会支持水平及其与心理健康的关系。对武装部队创伤康复结果(ADVANCE)前瞻性队列研究的基线数据进行了分析。将有代表性的英国战斗受伤人员样本与未受伤人员的频率匹配样本进行了比较。使用多维感知社会支持量表(MSPSS)完成了经过验证的问卷。使用线性样条进行 MSPSS 评分转换,在≥55 处有一个结。多变量逻辑回归分析检查了感知社会支持与心理健康之间的关联。共有 521 名战斗受伤参与者(137 名截肢者)和 515 名未受伤参与者被纳入研究。MSPSS 评分中位数为 65(四分位距[IQR] 54-74)。受伤和未受伤的参与者报告的 MSPSS 评分相似,截肢和非截肢受伤的参与者也是如此。MSPSS 评分每增加一个单位(评分≥55),创伤后应激障碍的几率降低(调整后的优势比[OR]0.93,95%置信区间[CI]0.91 至 0.96)。在 MSPSS 评分低于 55 时,没有发现这种关联(OR 0.99,95%CI 0.97 至 1.01)。对于抑郁和焦虑,也观察到了类似的结果。感知社会支持可能是该人群干预的目标,无论受伤状况如何。

相似文献

1
The association between perceived social support and mental health in combat-injured and uninjured male UK (ex-)military personnel: A cross-sectional study.参战和未参战的英国(前)军事男性人员感知社会支持与心理健康之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
J Psychiatr Res. 2024 Nov;179:167-174. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.09.017. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
2
Mental health outcomes of male UK military personnel deployed to Afghanistan and the role of combat injury: analysis of baseline data from the ADVANCE cohort study.英国派往阿富汗的男性军人的心理健康结果和战斗伤害的作用: ADVANCE 队列研究的基线数据分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Jul;9(7):547-554. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00112-2.
3
Pain after combat injury in male UK military personnel deployed to Afghanistan.男性英国军人在阿富汗部署后的战斗伤害后疼痛。
Br J Anaesth. 2024 Jun;132(6):1285-1292. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.02.019. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
4
Post-traumatic growth amongst UK armed forces personnel who were deployed to Afghanistan and the role of combat injury, mental health and pain: the ADVANCE cohort study.英国武装部队派往阿富汗的军人创伤后成长情况以及战斗伤害、心理健康和疼痛的作用:ADVANCE 队列研究。
Psychol Med. 2023 Aug;53(11):5322-5331. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722002410. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
5
Level of perceived social support, and associated factors, in combat-exposed (ex-)military personnel: a systematic review and meta-analysis.战斗暴露(前)军人感知的社会支持水平及其相关因素的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024 Dec;59(12):2119-2143. doi: 10.1007/s00127-024-02685-3. Epub 2024 May 21.
6
Deployment of personnel to military operations: impact on mental health and social functioning.人员部署到军事行动中:对心理健康和社会功能的影响。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 1;14(1):1-127. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.6. eCollection 2018.
7
Mental health outcomes at the end of the British involvement in the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts: a cohort study.英国在伊拉克和阿富汗冲突结束时的心理健康结果:一项队列研究。
Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;213(6):690-697. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2018.175. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
8
Upper Limb Function in People With Upper and Lower Limb Loss 8 Years Postinjury: The Armed Services Trauma Outcome Study (ADVANCE) Cohort Study.上肢损伤 8 年后上肢和下肢丧失功能的人:武装部队创伤结果研究(ADVANCE)队列研究。
Phys Ther. 2024 Oct 2;104(10). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzae082.
9
What are the consequences of deployment to Iraq and Afghanistan on the mental health of the UK armed forces? A cohort study.部署到伊拉克和阿富汗对英国武装部队心理健康的后果是什么?一项队列研究。
Lancet. 2010 May 22;375(9728):1783-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60672-1. Epub 2010 May 12.
10
Cohort profile: the Prospective Research In Stress-Related Military Operations (PRISMO) study in the Dutch Armed Forces.队列研究概况:荷兰武装部队应激相关军事行动前瞻性研究(PRISMO)。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 5;9(3):e026670. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026670.

引用本文的文献

1
Cumulative Incidence of Mental Disorders Among German Military Personnel Deployed to Iraq 2015-2018-An Epidemiological Study.2015 - 2018年部署到伊拉克的德国军事人员精神障碍累积发病率——一项流行病学研究
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 May 14;15(5):81. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15050081.