• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

波罗的海流域的遗留营养物:过去的做法如何影响富营养化管理。

Legacy nutrients in the Baltic Sea drainage basin: How past practices affect eutrophication management.

机构信息

Baltic Sea Centre, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.

Baltic Sea Centre, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2024 Nov;370:122478. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122478. Epub 2024 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122478
PMID:39303590
Abstract

We have constructed a nutrient fate model for the Baltic Sea that links anthropogenic nitrogen and phosphorus inputs to the catchment to the dynamics of waterborne loads to the Baltic Sea, covering the time-period from 1900 to present. During this period, nutrient inputs to the drainage basin approximately tripled to a peak in the 1980s, after which they declined. Our model accounts for temporary nutrient storage on land and in inland waters, forming active legacy pools that contribute to nutrient export to the Baltic Sea, and for nutrient removal by terrestrial and aquatic sinks. The model indicates that response times to changes in anthropogenic nutrient inputs to the drainage basin are approximately 4 years for riverine nitrogen and 6-18 years for riverine phosphorus loads. Mineral fertilizer use in agriculture dominates nutrient inputs to the drainage basin, whereas the composition of riverine loads also depends on the collection and treatment of domestic sewage. Removal by terrestrial and aquatic nutrient sinks was the dominant fate of both nitrogen and phosphorus in our model. The amount of nutrients currently stored in legacy pools is therefore much smaller than what the difference between cumulative nutrient inputs to the catchment and the export to the sea suggests. Nevertheless, mobilization from these storage pools is the primary contribution to current anthropogenic riverine nutrient loads to the Baltic Sea. For phosphorus, the legacy effects of past reductions in inputs to the catchment can entail a significant, yet unrealized contribution toward the load reductions stipulated by Baltic Sea management plans. Therefore, accounting for nutrient storage, time-lags, and legacy effects could notably reduce the need for additional future mitigation measures.

摘要

我们构建了一个波罗的海养分命运模型,将人为输入的氮和磷与流域汇水的水载负荷动态联系起来,涵盖了从 1900 年至今的时间段。在此期间,营养物质输入流域的量增加了两倍多,达到了 20 世纪 80 年代的峰值,之后开始下降。我们的模型考虑了陆地上和内陆水中暂时储存的养分,形成了活跃的遗留养分库,这些库有助于养分向波罗的海的输出,以及陆地和水生汇的养分去除。该模型表明,流域人为养分输入变化的响应时间大约为 4 年,对河流氮的影响,6-18 年对河流磷的影响。农业中矿物肥料的使用主导着流域的养分输入,而河流负荷的组成也取决于城市污水的收集和处理。陆地和水生养分汇的去除是我们模型中氮和磷的主要归宿。目前,储存在遗留库中的养分量远小于流域养分输入与海洋输出之间的差值所表明的数量。尽管如此,从这些储存库中释放出来的养分仍然是当前人为向波罗的海河流输入养分负荷的主要贡献因素。对于磷来说,过去减少输入流域的遗留效应可能会对波罗的海管理计划规定的负荷减少产生显著但尚未实现的贡献。因此,考虑养分储存、时滞和遗留效应可以显著减少未来额外缓解措施的需求。

相似文献

1
Legacy nutrients in the Baltic Sea drainage basin: How past practices affect eutrophication management.波罗的海流域的遗留营养物:过去的做法如何影响富营养化管理。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Nov;370:122478. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122478. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
2
Import-export balance of nitrogen and phosphorus in food, fodder and fertilizers in the Baltic Sea drainage area.波罗的海流域食品、饲料和肥料中氮磷的进出口平衡。
Sci Total Environ. 2011 Nov 1;409(23):4917-22. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.08.030. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
3
Hierarchy of factors exerting an impact on nutrient load of the Baltic Sea and sustainable management of its drainage basin.影响波罗的海营养负荷及其流域可持续管理的因素层次结构。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2014 Nov 15;88(1-2):162-73. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
4
Nutrient export from Finnish rivers into the Baltic Sea has not decreased despite water protection measures.尽管采取了水保护措施,但芬兰河流向波罗的海的营养物质输出并没有减少。
Ambio. 2020 Feb;49(2):460-474. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01217-7. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
5
The MARINA model (Model to Assess River Inputs of Nutrients to seAs): Model description and results for China.MARINA 模型(评估河流输入营养物质到海洋的模型):模型描述及中国的结果。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Aug 15;562:869-888. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.071. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
6
Cleaning up seas using blue growth initiatives: Mussel farming for eutrophication control in the Baltic Sea.利用蓝色增长倡议清理海洋:利用贻贝养殖控制波罗的海富营养化。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Mar 20;709:136144. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136144. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
7
Trends, insights and effects of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (91/271/EEC) implementation in the light of the Polish coastal zone eutrophication.波兰沿海富营养化视角下《城市污水处理指令》(91/271/EEC)实施的趋势、见解和影响。
Environ Manage. 2021 Feb;67(2):342-354. doi: 10.1007/s00267-020-01401-6. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
8
Long-term temporal and spatial trends in eutrophication status of the Baltic Sea.波罗的海富营养化状况的长期时空趋势。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Feb;92(1):135-149. doi: 10.1111/brv.12221. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
9
Future socioeconomic conditions may have a larger impact than climate change on nutrient loads to the Baltic Sea.未来的社会经济条件对波罗的海营养负荷的影响可能比气候变化更大。
Ambio. 2019 Nov;48(11):1325-1336. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01243-5. Epub 2019 Sep 21.
10
Has eutrophication promoted forage fish production in the Baltic Sea?富营养化促进了波罗的海饵料鱼的产量吗?
Ambio. 2016 Oct;45(6):649-60. doi: 10.1007/s13280-016-0788-3. Epub 2016 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Direct Evidence of Microbial Sunscreen Production by Scum-Forming Cyanobacteria in the Baltic Sea.波罗的海形成浮沫的蓝藻细菌产生微生物防晒霜的直接证据。
Environ Microbiol Rep. 2025 Feb;17(1):e70056. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.70056.