Top End Mental Health Service, Royal Darwin Hospital, Casuarina, NT, Australia.
Faculty of Health, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT, Australia; and.
Australas Psychiatry. 2024 Dec;32(6):496-509. doi: 10.1177/10398562241283582. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
Government mandated quarantine outside the home was implemented to mitigate COVID-19 in some countries. Individual studies report that this can result in psychological distress. Investigating levels of distress and associated risk factors across different settings would inform public health models of care during future pandemics. However, no previous systematic reviews have been conducted on the topic. Therefore, we systematically reviewed international research on the prevalence and risk factors of psychological distress within supervised quarantine facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic.
A systematic review of the literature was conducted using Medline, Psychological and Behavioural Sciences, Psych Info, Cochrane databases and Google Scholar from January 2020 until June 2023. Relevant quantitative studies published in English were included.
13 studies (pooled participants = 4366) were included in this review. The prevalence of psychological distress varied widely across the included studies (depression 4%-63%; anxiety 4%-100%; stress 1%-68%). Associated risk factors identified were also heterogeneous between studies and facilities.
In future pandemics, the benefits of infection mitigation need to be weighed against the risk of psychological distress. Models of care utilising specifically designed facilities, with greater freedoms, increased comfort and ease of access to mental health services may limit psychological distress.
一些国家实施了政府强制要求的居家隔离,以减轻 COVID-19 的影响。个别研究报告称,这可能会导致心理困扰。调查不同环境下的困扰程度和相关风险因素将为未来大流行期间的公共卫生护理模式提供信息。然而,此前尚未对此主题进行过系统审查。因此,我们系统地审查了 COVID-19 大流行期间在监督隔离设施中出现心理困扰的流行率和风险因素的国际研究。
我们使用 Medline、心理和行为科学、心理信息、Cochrane 数据库和 Google Scholar 从 2020 年 1 月至 2023 年 6 月进行了文献的系统审查。纳入了发表在英文期刊上的相关定量研究。
本综述共纳入了 13 项研究(汇总参与者=4366 人)。纳入研究中心理困扰的流行率差异很大(抑郁 4%-63%;焦虑 4%-100%;压力 1%-68%)。不同研究和设施之间,相关风险因素也存在异质性。
在未来的大流行中,需要权衡感染缓解的益处与心理困扰的风险。利用专门设计的设施、更大的自由、更高的舒适度和更容易获得心理健康服务的护理模式可能会限制心理困扰。