Akiskal H S
J Clin Psychiatry. 1985 Oct;46(10 Pt 2):32-7.
Many patients referred to specialized affective disorder units in the 1970s because of chronicity, treatment resistance, or treatment failure were found to have been inadequately treated--most typically with suboptimal trials of one to two tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs). In the 1980s, patients are being declared "treatment failures" following a more sophisticated range of treatment efforts. In part, the change can be attributed to systematic feedback provided by mood clinics to referring clinicians and to nationwide educational efforts. Terminologic and conceptual issues are reviewed, and chronicity and treatment failure in patients with affective disorders are examined from a multifactorial perspective involving pharmacokinetic factors, patient compliance, adequacy of somatic treatments, physician countertransference, social and interpersonal aspects, nosologic considerations, and medical-neurologic contributions. A systematic approach for evaluating and treating such patients is outlined.
20世纪70年代,许多因病情慢性化、治疗抵抗或治疗失败而被转诊至专业情感障碍治疗单元的患者,被发现此前治疗不充分——最典型的情况是对一至两种三环类抗抑郁药(TCA)进行了不理想的试验。在20世纪80年代,经过一系列更复杂的治疗努力后,患者仍被判定为“治疗失败”。这种变化部分可归因于情绪诊所向转诊医生提供的系统反馈以及全国范围内的教育工作。本文回顾了术语和概念问题,并从多因素角度审视了情感障碍患者的慢性化和治疗失败问题,这些因素包括药代动力学因素、患者依从性、躯体治疗的充分性、医生的反移情、社会和人际方面、疾病分类学考虑以及医学 - 神经学因素。文中概述了评估和治疗此类患者的系统方法。