• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痴呆症友好社区(DFC)提高痴呆症患者的生活质量:一个现实主义的综述。

Dementia Friendly communities (DFCs) to improve quality of life for people with dementia: a realist review.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern, Ireland.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2024 Sep 20;24(1):776. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05343-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-024-05343-0
PMID:39304830
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11414204/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently, there are more than 55 million people living with dementia worldwide. Supporting people with dementia to live as independently as possible in their communities is a global public health objective. There is limited research exploring the implementation of such interventions in the community context. The aim of the review was to create and refine programme theory - in the form of context mechanism-outcome configurations - on how the characteristics of dementia-friendly communities (DFCs) as geographical locations interact with their social and organisational contexts to understand what works for whom and why.

METHODS

This realist review sourced literature from 5 electronic databases: Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Medline, Scopus, PsychINFO and Google Scholar, as well as relevant websites such as Alzheimer's Society to identify grey literature. Methodological rigour was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool.

RESULTS

Seven papers were included in this realist review that focused on DFCs in a geographical context The implementation of DFC interventions emerged as a process characterised by two pivotal implementation phases, intricately linked with sub-interventions. The first intervention, termed Hierarchy Commitment (I1a/b), involves the formalisation of agreements by businesses and organizations, along with the implementation of dementia-friendly action plans. Additionally, Educational Resources (I1c) play a significant role in this phase, engaging individuals with dementia and their caregivers in educational initiatives. The second phase, Geographical/Environmental Requirements (I2), encompasses the establishment of effective dementia-friendly signage, accessible meeting places, and community support.

CONCLUSIONS

This realist review highlighted a theoretical framework that might guide the development of dementia-friendly communities to enhance the experiences of individuals with dementia and their caregivers within DFCs. Emphasising the need for a theoretical framework in developing geographical DFCs, the review outlines contextual elements, mechanisms, and outcomes, providing a foundation for future studies. The ultimate goal is to establish a robust body of evidence for the sustainable implementation of dementia-friendly communities, thereby improving the quality of life for those with dementia.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022317784.

摘要

背景

目前,全球有超过 5500 万人患有痴呆症。支持痴呆症患者在社区中尽可能独立地生活是全球公共卫生目标。目前,关于在社区环境中实施此类干预措施的研究有限。本研究的目的是创建和完善方案理论——以情境-机制-结果配置的形式——了解痴呆症友好社区(DFC)作为地理位置的特征如何与社会和组织背景相互作用,以了解对谁有效以及为什么有效。

方法

本真实主义综述从 5 个电子数据库(Cochrane Library、CINAHL、Medline、Scopus、PsychINFO 和 Google Scholar)以及阿尔茨海默病协会等相关网站来源文献,以确定灰色文献。使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所的批判性评估工具评估方法的严谨性。

结果

本真实主义综述纳入了 7 篇专注于地理背景下 DFC 的论文。DFC 干预措施的实施是一个过程,其特点是两个关键的实施阶段,与子干预措施密切相关。第一个干预措施称为“层次结构承诺”(I1a/b),涉及企业和组织的正式协议,以及实施痴呆症友好行动计划。此外,教育资源(I1c)在这一阶段也发挥了重要作用,使痴呆症患者及其照顾者参与教育计划。第二阶段是“地理/环境要求”(I2),包括建立有效的痴呆症友好标识、无障碍会议场所和社区支持。

结论

本真实主义综述强调了一个理论框架,该框架可能指导痴呆症友好社区的发展,以增强 DFC 中痴呆症患者及其照顾者的体验。该综述强调了在发展地理 DFC 方面需要一个理论框架,概述了情境要素、机制和结果,为未来的研究奠定了基础。最终目标是为痴呆症友好社区的可持续实施建立一个强有力的证据基础,从而提高痴呆症患者的生活质量。

研究注册

本研究在 PROSPERO 注册,注册号为 2022 CRD42022317784。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4c3/11414204/f108381d9fc7/12877_2024_5343_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4c3/11414204/e8fc6a105a83/12877_2024_5343_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4c3/11414204/f108381d9fc7/12877_2024_5343_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4c3/11414204/e8fc6a105a83/12877_2024_5343_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4c3/11414204/f108381d9fc7/12877_2024_5343_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Dementia Friendly communities (DFCs) to improve quality of life for people with dementia: a realist review.痴呆症友好社区(DFC)提高痴呆症患者的生活质量:一个现实主义的综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Sep 20;24(1):776. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05343-0.
2
Exploring the experiences of people living with dementia in Dementia Friendly Communities (DFCs) in Northern Ireland: a realist evaluation protocol.探索北爱尔兰痴呆症友好社区(DFC)中痴呆症患者的体验:一项现实评估方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jun 9;23(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04090-y.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
How do community based dementia friendly initiatives work for people with dementia and their caregivers, and why? A rapid realist review.基于社区的痴呆症友好倡议如何为痴呆症患者及其照护者服务,原因是什么?快速现实主义综述。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;37(2). doi: 10.1002/gps.5662. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
5
Deprescribing medicines in older people living with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: the TAILOR evidence synthesis.针对多病共存和多种药物治疗的老年人减药:TAILOR 证据综合。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Jul;26(32):1-148. doi: 10.3310/AAFO2475.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Dementia-friendly interventions to improve the care of people living with dementia admitted to hospitals: a realist review.改善住院痴呆症患者护理的痴呆友好型干预措施:一项现实主义综述。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 16;7(7):e015257. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015257.
8
What matters in development and sustainment of community dementia friendly initiatives and why? A realist multiple case study.社区老年痴呆症友好举措的发展和维持的关键因素是什么?为什么?一项现实主义的多案例研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 9;23(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15125-9.
9
A group intervention to improve quality of life for people with advanced dementia living in care homes: the Namaste feasibility cluster RCT.一项改善养老院中晚期痴呆症患者生活质量的团体干预措施:Namaste 可行性聚类 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jan;24(6):1-140. doi: 10.3310/hta24060.
10
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Translation and Validation of the Chinese Version of the Brief Adolescent Attitudes Towards Dementia Scale (Brief AADS-C): A Psychometric Study.《青少年痴呆态度简表中文版(Brief AADS-C)的翻译与验证:一项心理测量学研究》
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2025 Jan-Dec;40:15333175251361268. doi: 10.1177/15333175251361268. Epub 2025 Jul 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the experiences of people living with dementia in Dementia Friendly Communities (DFCs) in Northern Ireland: a realist evaluation protocol.探索北爱尔兰痴呆症友好社区(DFC)中痴呆症患者的体验:一项现实评估方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jun 9;23(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04090-y.
2
Collaboration for Developing and Sustaining Community Dementia-Friendly Initiatives: A Realist Evaluation.发展和维持社区痴呆友好倡议的合作:一个现实主义评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 23;20(5):4006. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054006.
3
What matters in development and sustainment of community dementia friendly initiatives and why? A realist multiple case study.
社区老年痴呆症友好举措的发展和维持的关键因素是什么?为什么?一项现实主义的多案例研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 9;23(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15125-9.
4
Creating a Dementia Friendly Community in an African American Neighborhood: Perspectives of People Living with Dementia, Care Partners, Stakeholders, and Community Residents.在非裔美国人社区创建一个认知症友好社区:认知症患者、照护者、利益相关者和社区居民的观点。
J Appl Gerontol. 2023 Feb;42(2):280-289. doi: 10.1177/07334648221130055. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
5
Promoting cultural change towards dementia friendly communities: a multi-level intervention in Japan.促进向关爱痴呆症患者社区的文化转变:日本的一项多层次干预措施。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 23;22(1):360. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03030-6.
6
Exercise Interventions for Women with Ovarian Cancer: A Realist Review.针对卵巢癌女性的运动干预:一项现实综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Apr 13;10(4):720. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10040720.
7
How do community based dementia friendly initiatives work for people with dementia and their caregivers, and why? A rapid realist review.基于社区的痴呆症友好倡议如何为痴呆症患者及其照护者服务,原因是什么?快速现实主义综述。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;37(2). doi: 10.1002/gps.5662. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
8
Developing supportive local communities: Perspectives from people with dementia and caregivers participating in the IDEAL programme.发展支持性的当地社区:参与 IDEAL 项目的痴呆症患者和照护者的观点。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2022 Nov 2;34(6):839-859. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2021.1973341. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
9
Using Realist Evaluation to Understand Process Outcomes in a COVID-19-Impacted Yoga Intervention Trial: A Worked Example.运用现实主义评价理解新冠疫情影响下瑜伽干预试验的过程结局:实例研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 27;18(17):9065. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179065.
10
Sustaining community-based interventions for people affected by dementia long term: the SCI-Dem realist review.长期为受痴呆影响的人群维持基于社区的干预措施:SCI-Dem 现实审查。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 7;11(7):e047789. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047789.