• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于社区的痴呆症友好倡议如何为痴呆症患者及其照护者服务,原因是什么?快速现实主义综述。

How do community based dementia friendly initiatives work for people with dementia and their caregivers, and why? A rapid realist review.

机构信息

Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud University Mmedical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Radboud Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;37(2). doi: 10.1002/gps.5662. Epub 2021 Dec 6.

DOI:10.1002/gps.5662
PMID:34825742
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9299867/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe and explain the outcomes of community dementia friendly initiatives (DFIs) for people with dementia and their caregivers to inform the development and tailoring of DFIs.

METHODS

Literature searches on DFIs were performed through two systematic online database searches of PubMed, Embase, ASSIA, CINAHL and Google scholar. Papers were only included if they evaluated outcomes using empirical data from people with dementia or caregivers. Data collection and analysis were guided by the categorization in the DEM-FACT taxonomy and RAMESES guidelines for realist reviews.

RESULTS

Of 7154 records identified, 22 papers were included with qualitative, mixed method and quantitative study designs. The synthesis led to a description of programme theories addressing caring, stimulating and activating communities. Outcomes for people with dementia and caregivers included having contact with others, enjoyment and decrease of stress and, lastly, support. This synthesis also indicated how people with dementia participated in a specific role in DFIs, such as patient, team member or active citizen.

CONCLUSIONS

DFIs generate different outcomes for people with dementia and caregivers, depending on the kind of initiative and the specific role for people with dementia. These findings could be a catalyst for initiation and further development of DFIs in a dementia friendly community (DFC). This draws attention to the multiple aspects of DFCs and supports reflection on their essential principles.

摘要

目的

描述和解释社区痴呆症友好倡议(DFI)对痴呆症患者及其照顾者的结果,以为 DFI 的制定和调整提供信息。

方法

通过对 PubMed、Embase、ASSIA、CINAHL 和 Google Scholar 进行两次系统的在线数据库搜索,对 DFI 进行文献检索。只有使用来自痴呆症患者或照顾者的实证数据评估结果的论文才会被纳入。数据收集和分析遵循 DEM-FACT 分类法和真实审查的 RAMESES 指南。

结果

在确定的 7154 条记录中,有 22 篇论文被纳入,这些论文采用了定性、混合方法和定量研究设计。综合分析导致了针对关怀、刺激和激活社区的方案理论的描述。痴呆症患者和照顾者的结果包括与他人接触、享受和减少压力以及最后获得支持。这一综合分析还表明了痴呆症患者在 DFI 中如何扮演特定角色,例如患者、团队成员或积极公民。

结论

DFI 为痴呆症患者和照顾者带来不同的结果,这取决于倡议的类型和痴呆症患者的特定角色。这些发现可能会成为在痴呆症友好社区(DFC)中发起和进一步发展 DFI 的催化剂。这引起了对 DFC 多方面的关注,并支持对其基本原则的反思。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95e8/9299867/8b7e6455b4a1/GPS-37-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95e8/9299867/30d826cd87f0/GPS-37-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95e8/9299867/16882508fc3a/GPS-37-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95e8/9299867/0347e6df68ed/GPS-37-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95e8/9299867/8b7e6455b4a1/GPS-37-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95e8/9299867/30d826cd87f0/GPS-37-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95e8/9299867/16882508fc3a/GPS-37-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95e8/9299867/0347e6df68ed/GPS-37-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95e8/9299867/8b7e6455b4a1/GPS-37-0-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
How do community based dementia friendly initiatives work for people with dementia and their caregivers, and why? A rapid realist review.基于社区的痴呆症友好倡议如何为痴呆症患者及其照护者服务,原因是什么?快速现实主义综述。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;37(2). doi: 10.1002/gps.5662. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
2
What matters in development and sustainment of community dementia friendly initiatives and why? A realist multiple case study.社区老年痴呆症友好举措的发展和维持的关键因素是什么?为什么?一项现实主义的多案例研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 9;23(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15125-9.
3
Collaboration for Developing and Sustaining Community Dementia-Friendly Initiatives: A Realist Evaluation.发展和维持社区痴呆友好倡议的合作:一个现实主义评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 23;20(5):4006. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054006.
4
Exploring the experiences of people living with dementia in Dementia Friendly Communities (DFCs) in Northern Ireland: a realist evaluation protocol.探索北爱尔兰痴呆症友好社区(DFC)中痴呆症患者的体验:一项现实评估方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jun 9;23(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04090-y.
5
Dementia Friendly communities (DFCs) to improve quality of life for people with dementia: a realist review.痴呆症友好社区(DFC)提高痴呆症患者的生活质量:一个现实主义的综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Sep 20;24(1):776. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05343-0.
6
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
7
Dementia-friendly interventions to improve the care of people living with dementia admitted to hospitals: a realist review.改善住院痴呆症患者护理的痴呆友好型干预措施:一项现实主义综述。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 16;7(7):e015257. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015257.
8
Managing diabetes in people with dementia: a realist review.管理痴呆症患者的糖尿病:一项现实主义综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Dec;21(75):1-140. doi: 10.3310/hta21750.
9
Interventions that support the creation of dementia friendly environments in health care: protocol for a realist review.支持在医疗保健中创建痴呆症友好型环境的干预措施:一项现实主义综述方案
Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 14;4:180. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0168-2.
10
'Practice what you preach'. Perspectives on the involvement of people with dementia and carers in community-based dementia friendly initiatives, a qualitative study.“言行一致”。关于痴呆症患者及其照料者参与社区痴呆友好型倡议的观点,一项定性研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 May 16;15:1387536. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1387536. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Advisory groups in realist reviews: Systematically mapping current research and recommendations for practice.现实主义综述中的咨询小组:系统梳理当前研究及实践建议
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2024 Jun 11;2(6):e12073. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12073. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Co-Producing and Evaluating a Culturally Inclusive Dementia Education Initiative: A Multimethod Study Protocol.共同制作和评估一项具有文化包容性的痴呆症教育倡议:一项多方法研究方案。
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70307. doi: 10.1111/hex.70307.
3
Access to Neighborhood Amenities and Services and the Risk of 2-Year Nursing Home Placement Among Persons Living With Dementia.

本文引用的文献

1
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.《PRISMA 2020声明:报告系统评价的更新指南》
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
2
A survey of the experience of living with dementia in a dementia-friendly community.在一个对痴呆症友好的社区中,对痴呆症患者生活体验的调查。
Dementia (London). 2021 Jul;20(5):1711-1722. doi: 10.1177/1471301220965552. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
3
Lost in reviews: Looking for the involvement of stakeholders, patients, public and other non-researcher contributors in realist reviews.
痴呆症患者获得社区便利设施和服务的情况与入住养老院两年的风险
Innov Aging. 2025 Feb 13;9(5):igaf011. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igaf011. eCollection 2025.
4
Discussing methodological gaps in psychosocial intervention research for dementia: an opinion article from the INTERDEM Methodology Taskforce guided by the MRC framework.探讨痴呆症心理社会干预研究中的方法学差距:一篇由MRC框架指导的INTERDEM方法学工作组撰写的观点文章。
Front Dement. 2024 Sep 26;3:1458023. doi: 10.3389/frdem.2024.1458023. eCollection 2024.
5
Dementia Friendly communities (DFCs) to improve quality of life for people with dementia: a realist review.痴呆症友好社区(DFC)提高痴呆症患者的生活质量:一个现实主义的综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Sep 20;24(1):776. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05343-0.
6
Fostering social health of people with dementia: evaluation of dementia awareness campaign in Poland.促进痴呆症患者的社会健康:波兰痴呆症认知活动评估。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 21;12:1418867. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1418867. eCollection 2024.
7
'Practice what you preach'. Perspectives on the involvement of people with dementia and carers in community-based dementia friendly initiatives, a qualitative study.“言行一致”。关于痴呆症患者及其照料者参与社区痴呆友好型倡议的观点,一项定性研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 May 16;15:1387536. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1387536. eCollection 2024.
8
Age-specific prevalence of the different clinical presentations of AD and FTD in young-onset dementia.不同临床表现的 AD 和 FTD 在早发性痴呆中的年龄特异性患病率。
J Neurol. 2024 Jul;271(7):4326-4335. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12364-7. Epub 2024 Apr 21.
9
Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 7: Qualitative evidence synthesis for emerging themes in primary care research: Scoping review, meta-ethnography and rapid realist review.系列:定性研究实用指南。第 7 部分:初级保健研究新兴主题的定性证据综合:范围综述、元民族志和快速现实主义综述。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2023 Oct 24;29(1):2274467. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2023.2274467. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
10
Collaboration for Developing and Sustaining Community Dementia-Friendly Initiatives: A Realist Evaluation.发展和维持社区痴呆友好倡议的合作:一个现实主义评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 23;20(5):4006. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054006.
迷失在综述中:寻找利益相关者、患者、公众和其他非研究人员在现实主义综述中的参与。
Res Synth Methods. 2021 Mar;12(2):239-247. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1459. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
4
Dementia-Friendly Neighbourhoods in Canada: A Carer Perspective.加拿大的痴呆症友好社区:照顾者视角。
Can J Aging. 2021 Sep;40(3):451-462. doi: 10.1017/S0714980820000252. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
5
Experiences of rural life among community-dwelling older men with dementia and their implications for social inclusion.农村生活体验对社区居住的老年痴呆症男性患者的影响及其对社会包容的意义。
Dementia (London). 2021 Feb;20(2):444-463. doi: 10.1177/1471301219887586. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
6
What you say and what I want: Priorities for public health campaigning and initiatives in relation to dementia.你所说的与我想要的:痴呆症公共卫生宣传及倡议的优先事项。
Australas J Ageing. 2019 Sep;38 Suppl 2:59-67. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12647.
7
Dementia-friendly community indicators from the perspectives of people living with dementia and dementia-family caregivers.从痴呆症患者及其家庭照顾者的角度看对痴呆症友好的社区指标。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Nov;75(11):2878-2889. doi: 10.1111/jan.14123. Epub 2019 Jul 21.
8
Experiences of Living in the Community for Older Aboriginal Persons With Dementia Symptoms in Taiwan.台湾地区有痴呆症状的老年原住民在社区生活的体验。
Gerontologist. 2020 Apr 2;60(3):525-534. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz013.
9
Dementia Friendly Communities in England: A scoping study.英格兰的痴呆症友好社区:一项范围界定研究。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;34(8):1235-1243. doi: 10.1002/gps.5123. Epub 2019 May 20.
10
What is important to people living with dementia?: the 'long-list' of outcome items in the development of a core outcome set for use in the evaluation of non-pharmacological community-based health and social care interventions.对患有痴呆症的人来说重要的是什么?:在开发用于评估非药物性基于社区的健康和社会护理干预措施的核心结局集的过程中,“长列表”结局指标。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Mar 27;19(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1103-5.