• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌术后癌胚抗原水平的预后价值:荟萃分析。

Prognostic value of the postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level in colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Abdominal Wall Hernia Surgery, Qingdao University Affiliated Taian Central Hospital, Taian, Shandong, China.

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Qingdao University Affiliated Taian Central Hospital, Taian, Shandong, China.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2024 Oct;48(10):2359-2375. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12349. Epub 2024 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1002/wjs.12349
PMID:39304973
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is one of the commonly used preoperative biomarkers for colorectal cancer (CRC), but no meta-analysis has evaluated the findings of all recently published studies to determine whether its postoperative level can serve as a prognostic indicator.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search for eligible literature from the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases in October 2023. Studies that investigated the relationship between postoperative serum CEA levels and prognosis in CRC patients were included. Outcome indicators, including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and progression-free survival (PFS)/recurrence-free survival (RFS), were analyzed using a fixed-effects or random-effects model. The pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as effective values.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 20 eligible studies involving 10,114 CRC patients from the East Asian and Western countries. A comprehensive analysis revealed that elevated postoperative CEA levels were associated with low OS (HR: 2.92, 95% CI: 2.36-3.62, and p < 0.000), DFS (HR: 2.81, 95% CI: 2.01-3.94, and p < 0.000), and RFS/PFS (HR: 2.52, 95% CI: 1.75-3.62, p < 0.000). A subgroup analysis by region, analysis type, distant metastasis, HR obtain method, sample size, postoperative measurement date, and study design demonstrated that the negative correlation observed between high serum CEA levels after surgery and poor prognosis was not significantly different between the subgroups.

CONCLUSION

When CEA levels are found to be elevated during postoperative follow-up, more active intervention measures should be implemented to further improve the patient's survival outcomes.

摘要

背景

癌胚抗原(CEA)是结直肠癌(CRC)常用的术前生物标志物之一,但尚无荟萃分析评估所有近期发表研究的结果,以确定其术后水平是否可作为预后指标。

方法

我们于 2023 年 10 月在 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Web of Science 数据库中进行了系统的文献检索,纳入了研究 CRC 患者术后血清 CEA 水平与预后关系的研究。使用固定效应或随机效应模型分析总生存期(OS)、无病生存期(DFS)、无进展生存期(PFS)/无复发生存期(RFS)等结局指标。使用合并的风险比(HR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)作为有效值。

结果

本荟萃分析纳入了来自东亚和西方国家的 20 项研究,共纳入 10114 例 CRC 患者。综合分析表明,术后 CEA 水平升高与 OS(HR:2.92,95%CI:2.36-3.62,p<0.000)、DFS(HR:2.81,95%CI:2.01-3.94,p<0.000)和 RFS/PFS(HR:2.52,95%CI:1.75-3.62,p<0.000)降低有关。按地区、分析类型、远处转移、HR 获得方法、样本量、术后测量日期和研究设计进行亚组分析显示,术后血清 CEA 水平升高与预后不良之间的负相关在亚组间无显著差异。

结论

术后随访中发现 CEA 水平升高时,应采取更积极的干预措施,进一步改善患者的生存结局。

相似文献

1
Prognostic value of the postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level in colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.结直肠癌术后癌胚抗原水平的预后价值:荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2024 Oct;48(10):2359-2375. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12349. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
2
Meta-analysis of the prognostic value of serum carcinoembryonic antigen in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases after hepatectomy.血清癌胚抗原对结直肠癌肝转移患者肝切除术后预后价值的荟萃分析。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2024 Jul 1;33(4):334-346. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000859. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
3
Pre-operative carcinoembryonic antigen predicts survival following colorectal cancer surgery with curative intent.术前癌胚抗原可预测结直肠癌根治性手术后的生存情况。
ANZ J Surg. 2018 Dec;88(12):1311-1315. doi: 10.1111/ans.14723. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
4
Elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen level after curative surgery is a prognostic biomarker of stage II-III colorectal cancer.根治性手术后血清癌胚抗原水平升高是II-III期结直肠癌的预后生物标志物。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;47(11):2880-2887. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.041. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
5
Serum carcinoembryonic antigen to predict recurrence in the follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer.血清癌胚抗原预测结直肠癌患者随访中的复发。
Int J Biol Markers. 2019 Mar;34(1):60-68. doi: 10.1177/1724600818820679. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
6
Prognostic impact of carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in stage IV colorectal cancer patients after R0 resection.癌胚抗原和糖类抗原19-9对IV期结直肠癌患者R0切除术后的预后影响
J Surg Res. 2016 Oct;205(2):384-392. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.078. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
7
Early postoperative CEA level is a better prognostic indicator than is preoperative CEA level in predicting prognosis of patients with curable colorectal cancer.早期术后 CEA 水平是比术前 CEA 水平更好的预后指标,可用于预测可治愈结直肠癌患者的预后。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011 Sep;26(9):1135-41. doi: 10.1007/s00384-011-1209-5. Epub 2011 May 3.
8
Clinical validity of tissue carcinoembryonic antigen expression as ancillary to serum carcinoembryonic antigen concentration in patients curatively resected for colorectal cancer.结直肠癌患者根治性切除术后组织癌胚抗原表达对血清癌胚抗原浓度的辅助临床价值。
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Sep;15(9):e503-11. doi: 10.1111/codi.12304.
9
Grading carcinoembryonic antigen levels can enhance the effectiveness of prognostic stratification in patients with colorectal cancer: a single-centre retrospective study.癌胚抗原水平分级可提高结直肠癌患者预后分层的效果:单中心回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 29;14(10):e084219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084219.
10
Combined detection of preoperative serum CEA, CA19-9 and CA242 improve prognostic prediction of surgically treated colorectal cancer patients.术前血清癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原19-9(CA19-9)和糖类抗原242(CA242)联合检测可改善接受手术治疗的结直肠癌患者的预后预测。
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015 Nov 1;8(11):14853-63. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Albumin-bilirubin score: a promising predictor of postoperative distant metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer.白蛋白-胆红素评分:结直肠癌患者术后远处转移的一个有前景的预测指标。
Biomark Med. 2025 Feb;19(3):73-79. doi: 10.1080/17520363.2025.2455928. Epub 2025 Jan 21.