• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

速效胰岛素治疗开始后未达到糖化血红蛋白目标的2型糖尿病患者的预测:基于临床试验数据的机器学习框架应用

Prediction of People With Type 2 Diabetes Not Achieving HbA1c Target After Initiation of Fast-Acting Insulin Therapy: Using Machine Learning Framework on Clinical Trial Data.

作者信息

Stoltenberg Carsten Wridt, Hangaard Stine, Hejlesen Ole, Kronborg Thomas, Vestergaard Peter, Jensen Morten Hasselstrøm

机构信息

Aalborg University, Gistrup, Denmark.

Steno Diabetes Center North Denmark, Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Sep 20:19322968241280096. doi: 10.1177/19322968241280096.

DOI:10.1177/19322968241280096
PMID:39305031
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11571615/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Glycemic control is crucial for people with type 2 diabetes. However, only about half achieve the advocated HbA1c target of ≤7%. Identifying those who will probably struggle to reach this target may be valuable as they require additional support. Thus, the aim of this study was to develop a model to predict people with type 2 diabetes not achieving HbA1c target after initiating fast-acting insulin.

METHODS

Data from a randomized controlled trial (NCT01819129) of participants with type 2 diabetes initiating fast-acting insulin were used. Data included demographics, clinical laboratory values, self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG), health-related quality of life (SF-36), and body measurements. A logistic regression was developed to predict HbA1c target nonachievers. A potential of 196 features was input for a forward feature selection. To assess the performance, a 20-repeated stratified 5-fold cross-validation with area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) was used.

RESULTS

Out of the 467 included participants, 98 (21%) did not achieve HbA1c target of ≤7%. The forward selection identified 7 features: baseline HbA1c (%), mean postprandial SMBG at all meals 3 consecutive days before baseline (mmol/L), sex, no ketones in urine, baseline albumin (g/dL), baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L), and traces of protein in urine. The model had an AUROC of 0.745 [95% CI = 0.734, 0.756].

CONCLUSIONS

The model was able to predict those who did not achieve HbA1c target with promising performance, potentially enabling early identification of people with type 2 diabetes who require additional support to reach glycemic control.

摘要

背景与目的

血糖控制对于2型糖尿病患者至关重要。然而,只有约一半的患者能达到建议的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)目标值≤7%。识别那些可能难以达到该目标的患者可能很有价值,因为他们需要额外的支持。因此,本研究的目的是建立一个模型,以预测2型糖尿病患者在开始使用速效胰岛素后无法达到HbA1c目标的情况。

方法

使用一项针对开始使用速效胰岛素的2型糖尿病参与者的随机对照试验(NCT01819129)的数据。数据包括人口统计学信息、临床实验室值、自我监测血糖(SMBG)、健康相关生活质量(SF - 36)和身体测量数据。开发了一个逻辑回归模型来预测未达到HbA1c目标的患者。将196个潜在特征输入进行前向特征选择。为评估模型性能,采用了20次重复的分层5折交叉验证,并计算受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)。

结果

在纳入的467名参与者中,98名(21%)未达到HbA1c目标值≤7%。前向选择确定了7个特征:基线HbA1c(%)、基线前连续3天所有餐次的餐后平均SMBG(mmol/L)、性别、尿中无酮体、基线白蛋白(g/dL)、基线低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(mmol/L)和尿中微量蛋白。该模型的AUROC为0.745 [95%置信区间 = 0.734, 0.756]。

结论

该模型能够以良好的性能预测未达到HbA1c目标的患者,有可能早期识别出需要额外支持以实现血糖控制的2型糖尿病患者。

相似文献

1
Prediction of People With Type 2 Diabetes Not Achieving HbA1c Target After Initiation of Fast-Acting Insulin Therapy: Using Machine Learning Framework on Clinical Trial Data.速效胰岛素治疗开始后未达到糖化血红蛋白目标的2型糖尿病患者的预测:基于临床试验数据的机器学习框架应用
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Sep 20:19322968241280096. doi: 10.1177/19322968241280096.
2
(Ultra-)long-acting insulin analogues versus NPH insulin (human isophane insulin) for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.超长效胰岛素类似物与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素(人低精蛋白胰岛素)用于2型糖尿病成人患者的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 9;11(11):CD005613. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005613.pub4.
3
Machine Learning to Identify Predictors of Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes: An Analysis of Target HbA1c Reduction Using Empagliflozin/Linagliptin Data.利用机器学习识别2型糖尿病血糖控制的预测因素:基于恩格列净/利格列汀数据的糖化血红蛋白目标降低分析
Pharmaceut Med. 2019 Jun;33(3):209-217. doi: 10.1007/s40290-019-00281-4.
4
Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII) Pumps for Type 1 and Type 2 Adult Diabetic Populations: An Evidence-Based Analysis.用于 1 型和 2 型成年糖尿病患者群体的持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)泵:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(20):1-58. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
5
6
Humalog Mix 25 in patients with type 2 diabetes which do not achieve acceptable glycemic control with oral agents: results from a phase III, randomized, parallel study.在口服降糖药无法实现可接受血糖控制的2型糖尿病患者中使用优泌乐25混合胰岛素:一项III期随机平行研究的结果
Rom J Intern Med. 2003;41(2):153-62.
7
Mealtime 50/50 basal + prandial insulin analogue mixture with a basal insulin analogue, both plus metformin, in the achievement of target HbA1c and pre- and postprandial blood glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes: a multinational, 24-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparison.在2型糖尿病患者中,使用基础胰岛素类似物的餐时50/50基础胰岛素与餐时胰岛素类似物混合制剂,并联合二甲双胍,以实现糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)目标值以及餐前和餐后血糖水平:一项多国、24周、随机、开放标签、平行组对照研究。
Clin Ther. 2007 Nov;29(11):2349-64. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.11.016.
8
Real-World Outcomes of Individualized Targeted Therapy with Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL in Insulin-Naïve Korean People with Type 2 Diabetes: TOBE Study.胰岛素甘精 300 单位/毫升个体化靶向治疗在韩国初诊 2 型糖尿病患者中的真实世界结局:TOBE 研究。
Adv Ther. 2024 May;41(5):1967-1982. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02830-z. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
9
Increased particle size of triacylglycerol-enriched remnant lipoproteins, but not their plasma concentration or lipid content, augments risk prediction of incident type 2 diabetes.富含三酰甘油的残粒脂蛋白颗粒增大,而不是其血浆浓度或脂质含量增加,可增强 2 型糖尿病发病风险的预测。
Diabetologia. 2021 Feb;64(2):385-396. doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05322-1. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
10
Beyond HbA1c.超越糖化血红蛋白。
J Diabetes. 2017 Dec;9(12):1052-1053. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12590. Epub 2017 Sep 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of clinical prediction models (part 1): from development to external validation.临床预测模型的评估(第 1 部分):从建立到外部验证。
BMJ. 2024 Jan 8;384:e074819. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-074819.
2
Review: Machine learning in precision pharmacotherapy of type 2 diabetes-A promising future or a glimpse of hope?综述:机器学习在2型糖尿病精准药物治疗中的应用——前景光明还是仅一线希望?
Digit Health. 2023 Sep 29;9:20552076231203879. doi: 10.1177/20552076231203879. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
3
American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Consensus Statement: Comprehensive Type 2 Diabetes Management Algorithm - 2023 Update.美国临床内分泌学会共识声明:全面 2 型糖尿病管理算法-2023 年更新。
Endocr Pract. 2023 May;29(5):305-340. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2023.02.001.
4
Gaps Remain for Achieving HbA1c Targets for People with Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes Using Insulin: Results from NHANES 2009-2020.使用胰岛素治疗的1型或2型糖尿病患者在实现糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)目标方面仍存在差距:2009 - 2020年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)结果
Diabetes Ther. 2023 Jun;14(6):967-975. doi: 10.1007/s13300-023-01399-0. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
5
9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023.9. 血糖治疗的药物学方法:2023 年糖尿病的护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2023 Jan 1;46(Suppl 1):S140-S157. doi: 10.2337/dc23-S009.
6
Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2022. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).2022 年美国糖尿病协会 (ADA) 和欧洲糖尿病研究协会 (EASD) 共识报告:2 型糖尿病患者高血糖管理。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Nov 1;45(11):2753-2786. doi: 10.2337/dci22-0034.
7
Predicting Response to Bolus Insulin Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.预测 2 型糖尿病患者对胰岛素冲击治疗的反应。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Nov;17(6):1573-1579. doi: 10.1177/19322968221098057. Epub 2022 May 20.
8
Expert Group Recommendations on the Effective Use of Bolus Insulin in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.专家组关于 2 型糖尿病管理中有效使用胰岛素冲击疗法的建议。
Med Sci (Basel). 2021 May 28;9(2):38. doi: 10.3390/medsci9020038.
9
Determinants of Non-Adherence to Treatment Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Kenya: A Systematic Review.肯尼亚2型糖尿病患者治疗不依从性的决定因素:一项系统综述
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Jan 5;13:2069-2076. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S270137. eCollection 2020.
10
MINIMAR (MINimum Information for Medical AI Reporting): Developing reporting standards for artificial intelligence in health care.MINIMAR(医疗人工智能报告的最小信息):制定医疗人工智能报告的标准。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Dec 9;27(12):2011-2015. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa088.