Valera Carlos Alberto, Pissarra Teresa Cristina Tarlé, da Costa Adriana Monteiro, Fernandes Luís Filipe Sanches, Pacheco Fernando António Leal
Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo (ESALQ), Avenida Pádua Dias, 235, CEP 13418-900, Piracicaba, São Paulo State, Brazil; Regional Coordination of Environmental Justice Prosecutors for the Paranaíba and Baixo Rio Grande River Basins, Rua Coronel Antônio Rios, 951, Uberaba, MG 38061-150, Brazil; POLUS-Land Use Policy Group, Paulista State University (UNESP), Access Way Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane, s/n, Jaboticabal, SP 14884-900, Brazil.
Paulista State University (UNESP), Access Way Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane, s/n, Jaboticabal, SP 14884-900, Brazil; POLUS-Land Use Policy Group, Paulista State University (UNESP), Access Way Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane, s/n, Jaboticabal, SP 14884-900, Brazil.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Dec 1;954:176355. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176355. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
Soil conservation adheres to various United Nations Sustainable Development Goals while in Brazil is a constitutional obligation. To attain the goals and fulfil the obligation, laws, policies, governance and science must be imbricated to deliver suitable conservation solutions for the long term, namely appropriate to positively influence other downstream chains such as the food chain. However, in Brazil, a major world producer and exporter of food, weaknesses were recently diagnosed by judicial authorities concerning soil governance and coordinated land use policies. Integrated scientific assessments on soil conservation and mitigation of degraded soil are also lacking in this country. This was enough motivation and the purpose to present here a holistic view over the soil conservation agenda and promoting policies in Brazil, based on a literature review that followed the guidelines and criteria of PRISMA approach. We termed this analysis a review hinged on "edge-to-edge" science contributions for two reasons. Firstly, the intent of retrieving from the recently published literature solely papers centered on a relevant soil conservation topic (e.g., soil characterization, here called an "edge") but with complementary analyses over boundary topics (frontier "edges", such as soil degradation). Secondly, the intent of underlining the urgency to assist decision-makers with scientific evidence in all dimensions of the soil conservation agenda ("edge-to-edge" science), namely soil characterization (e.g., quality reference values), soil degradation assessment (e.g., anthropogenic-related soil erosion or contamination), soil degradation consequences focused on the carbon cycle (e.g., net CO emissions and climate warming), sustainable management practices and production systems (e.g., no-tillage agriculture and integrated crop-livestock-forestry systems), and scientific evaluation of existing laws as well as of governance and policy programs with potential implications on soil quality (e.g., the Forest Code). Thus, this literature review addressed all these topics following a multidisciplinary discourse, which produced an extensive but comprehensive document about soil conservation in Brazil.
土壤保护符合联合国的各项可持续发展目标,而在巴西,这是一项宪法义务。为实现这些目标并履行该义务,必须将法律、政策、治理和科学结合起来,以提供长期适用的保护解决方案,即适合对其他下游链条(如食物链)产生积极影响的方案。然而,在巴西这个世界主要的粮食生产国和出口国,司法当局最近诊断出在土壤治理和协调土地利用政策方面存在薄弱环节。该国也缺乏关于土壤保护和退化土壤缓解的综合科学评估。基于遵循PRISMA方法的指导方针和标准进行的文献综述,这些足以成为在此呈现巴西土壤保护议程和促进政策的整体观点的动机和目的。我们将这一分析称为基于“边到边”科学贡献的综述,原因有二。其一,旨在从最近发表的文献中仅检索围绕相关土壤保护主题(如土壤特性,此处称为“边”)但对边界主题(前沿“边”,如土壤退化)进行补充分析的论文。其二,旨在强调迫切需要为土壤保护议程的所有维度(“边到边”科学)的决策者提供科学证据,即土壤特性(如质量参考值)、土壤退化评估(如人为相关的土壤侵蚀或污染)、关注碳循环的土壤退化后果(如净二氧化碳排放和气候变暖)、可持续管理实践和生产系统(如免耕农业和农牧林综合系统),以及对现有法律以及可能对土壤质量有影响的治理和政策计划进行科学评估(如《森林法》)。因此,这篇文献综述按照多学科论述探讨了所有这些主题,产生了一份关于巴西土壤保护的广泛而全面的文件。