Hua Alina, Velasco Carlos, Munoz Camila, Milotta Giorgia, Fotaki Anastasia, Bosio Filippo, Granlund Inka, Sularz Agata, Chiribiri Amedeo, Kunze Karl P, Botnar Rene, Prieto Claudia, Ismail Tevfik F
School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Cardiology Department, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2024;26(2):101100. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101100. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
The diagnosis of myocarditis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) requires the use of T2 and T1 weighted imaging, ideally incorporating parametric mapping. Current two-dimensional (2D) mapping sequences are acquired sequentially and involve multiple breath-holds resulting in prolonged scan times and anisotropic image resolution. We developed an isotropic free-breathing three-dimensional (3D) whole-heart sequence that allows simultaneous T1 and T2 mapping and validated it in patients with suspected myocarditis.
Eighteen healthy volunteers and 28 patients with suspected myocarditis underwent conventional 2D T1 and T2 mapping with whole-heart coverage and 3D joint T1/T2 mapping on a 1.5T scanner. Acquisition time, image quality, and diagnostic performance were compared. Qualitative analysis was performed using a 4-point Likert scale. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the quantitative agreement between 2D and 3D sequences.
The 3D T1/T2 sequence was acquired in 8 min 26 s under free breathing, whereas 2D T1 and T2 sequences were acquired with breath-holds in 11 min 44 s (p = 0.0001). All 2D images were diagnostic. For 3D images, 89% (25/28) of T1 and 96% (27/28) of T2 images were diagnostic with no significant difference in the proportion of diagnostic images for the 3D and 2D T1 (p = 0.2482) and T2 maps (p = 1.0000). Systematic bias in T1 was noted with biases of 102, 115, and 152 ms for basal-apical segments, with a larger bias for higher T1 values. Good agreement between T2 values for 3D and 2D techniques was found (bias of 1.8, 3.9, and 3.6 ms for basal-apical segments). The sensitivity and specificity of the 3D sequence for diagnosing acute myocarditis were 74% (95% confidence interval [CI] 49%-91%) and 83% (36%-100%), respectively, with a c-statistic (95% CI) of 0.85 (0.79-0.91) and no statistically significant difference between the 2D and 3D sequences for the detection of acute myocarditis for T1 (p = 0.2207) or T2 (p = 1.0000).
Free-breathing whole-heart 3D joint T1/T2 mapping was comparable to 2D mapping sequences with respect to diagnostic performance, but with the added advantages of free breathing and shorter scan times. Further work is required to address the bias noted at high T1 values, but this did not significantly impact diagnostic accuracy.
通过心血管磁共振(CMR)诊断心肌炎需要使用T2加权成像和T1加权成像,理想情况下应结合参数成像。当前的二维(2D)成像序列是顺序采集的,需要多次屏气,导致扫描时间延长和图像分辨率各向异性。我们开发了一种各向同性自由呼吸三维(3D)全心序列,可同时进行T1和T2成像,并在疑似心肌炎患者中进行了验证。
18名健康志愿者和28名疑似心肌炎患者在1.5T扫描仪上接受了全心脏覆盖的传统二维T1和T2成像以及三维联合T1/T2成像。比较了采集时间、图像质量和诊断性能。使用4点李克特量表进行定性分析。采用Bland-Altman图评估二维和三维序列之间的定量一致性。
三维T1/T2序列在自由呼吸状态下8分26秒采集完成,而二维T1和T2序列在屏气状态下11分44秒采集完成(p = 0.0001)。所有二维图像均具有诊断价值。对于三维图像,89%(25/28)的T1图像和96%(27/28)的T2图像具有诊断价值,三维和二维T1(p = 0.2482)及T2图(p = 1.0000)的诊断图像比例无显著差异。在T1方面存在系统偏差,基底-心尖节段的偏差分别为102、115和152毫秒,T1值越高偏差越大。发现三维和二维技术的T2值之间具有良好的一致性(基底-心尖节段偏差分别为1.8、3.9和3.6毫秒)。三维序列诊断急性心肌炎的敏感性和特异性分别为74%(95%置信区间[CI] 49%-91%)和83%(36%-100%),c统计量(95% CI)为0.85(0.79-0.91),在检测急性心肌炎方面,二维和三维序列在T1(p = 0.2207)或T2(p = 1.0000)上无统计学显著差异。
自由呼吸全心三维联合T1/T2成像在诊断性能方面与二维成像序列相当,但具有自由呼吸和扫描时间更短的额外优势。需要进一步研究解决高T1值时出现的偏差问题,但这并未对诊断准确性产生显著影响。