Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜经腹技术中一种新的网片固定方法——“缝线传递器”,更好吗?

A new approach to mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal technique, "suture passer", superior or not?

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Bandırma Training and Research Hospital, Balıkesir, Turkey.

Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2024 Nov;76(7):2617-2625. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01998-x. Epub 2024 Sep 21.

Abstract

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery is a common procedure and pain is a common postoperative complication. Guidelines for mesh fixation vary, with no clear rule. Mesh fixation may not be necessary in total extraperitoneal approach (TEP), but more research is needed for transabdominal preperitoneal approach (TAPP). This study was conducted comparing mesh fixation methods using a suture passer and tacker, aiming to reduce pain and operation time. We used the FUÇA method for mesh fixation in TAPP. The patients were divided into two groups: Group I underwent classical tacker method while Group II used the FUÇA method. There were 52 patients in Group I and 51 patients in Group II. Polypropylene mesh was used in both groups. The surgeries were performed by four experienced surgeons. We analyzed retrospective data including age, gender, BMI, surgical approach, procedure duration, defect size, recurrence status, postoperative pain, hernia type, and complications. Pain was assessed using VAS score and McGill pain index. Recurrence was evaluated by a different surgeon. A total of 103 patients were included: 52 in Group I and 51 in Group II. Both groups had a similar median age (47 years in Group I, 45 years in Group II) and predominantly male participants (92.3% in Group I, 92.2% in Group II). Most patients had indirect inguinal hernia (77.7%) while the rest had direct inguinal hernia (22.3%). There were no significant differences in BMI or hernia type between the groups. The defect size measured by ultrasound was similar in both groups. Group I had higher VAS pain scores on postoperative day 1, at month 1, and at month 3 compared to Group II, but the difference vanished at the 12-month mark. The McGill Pain Index showed similar results. Recurrence was observed in one patient in each group. Complications occurred in 11 patients during the follow-up period, with similar rates between the groups. The mean surgical procedure time of Group 2 was significantly shorter than that of Group 1 (49.36 m vs 43.43 m, p = 0.009). FUÇA method is a technique that can be used safely in the TAPP procedure as it reduces postoperative pain and shortens the operation time.

摘要

腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术是一种常见的手术,疼痛是一种常见的术后并发症。网片固定指南存在差异,没有明确的规定。在完全腹膜外入路(TEP)中,网片固定可能不是必需的,但在经腹腹膜前入路(TAPP)中需要更多的研究。本研究比较了使用缝线传递器和缝合钉钉合器的网片固定方法,旨在减轻疼痛和缩短手术时间。我们在 TAPP 中使用 FUÇA 方法进行网片固定。患者分为两组:组 I 行经典钉合器法,组 II 行 FUÇA 法。组 I 52 例,组 II 51 例。两组均使用聚丙烯网片。由 4 位经验丰富的外科医生进行手术。我们分析了包括年龄、性别、BMI、手术方式、手术时间、缺损大小、复发情况、术后疼痛、疝类型和并发症在内的回顾性数据。疼痛采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)和麦吉尔疼痛指数(McGill pain index)进行评估。复发由另一位外科医生评估。共纳入 103 例患者:组 I 52 例,组 II 51 例。两组患者的中位年龄(组 I 47 岁,组 II 45 岁)和主要参与者均为男性(组 I 92.3%,组 II 92.2%)。大多数患者为腹股沟斜疝(77.7%),其余为腹股沟直疝(22.3%)。两组患者的 BMI 或疝类型无显著差异。两组患者的超声测量缺损大小相似。组 I 在术后第 1 天、第 1 个月和第 3 个月的 VAS 疼痛评分高于组 II,但在 12 个月时差异消失。麦吉尔疼痛指数也有类似的结果。每组各有 1 例患者复发。在随访期间,11 例患者发生并发症,两组发生率相似。组 2 的平均手术时间明显短于组 1(49.36 分钟比 43.43 分钟,p=0.009)。FUÇA 方法是一种安全的 TAPP 手术技术,可减轻术后疼痛并缩短手术时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验