• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ChatGPT能否回答患者关于反肩关节置换术的问题?

Can ChatGPT answer patient questions regarding reverse shoulder arthroplasty?

作者信息

Lack Benjamin T, Mouhawasse Edwin, Childers Justin T, Jackson Garrett R, Daji Shay V, Yerke-Hansen Payton, Familiari Filippo, Knapik Derrick M, Sabesan Vani J

机构信息

Charles E. Schmidt Florida Atlantic University College of Medicine, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65212, USA.

出版信息

J ISAKOS. 2024 Dec;9(6):100323. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100323. Epub 2024 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100323
PMID:39307189
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has seen substantial progress in its utilization, with Chat Generated Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) is emerging as a popular language model. The purpose of this study was to test the accuracy and reliability of ChatGPT's responses to frequently asked questions (FAQ) pertaining to reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA).

METHODS

The ten most common FAQs were queried from institution patient education websites. These ten questions were then input into the chatbot during a single session without additional contextual information. The responses were then critically analyzed by two orthopedic surgeons for clarity, accuracy, and the quality of evidence-based information using The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark criteria and the DISCERN score. The readability of the responses was analyzed using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level.

RESULTS

In response to the ten questions, the average DISCERN score was 44 (range 38-51). Seven responses were classified as fair and three were poor. The JAMA Benchmark criteria score was 0 for all responses. Furthermore, the average Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level was 14.35, which correlates to a college graduate reading level.

CONCLUSION

Overall, ChatGPT was able to provide fair responses to common patient questions. However, the responses were all written at a college graduate reading level and lacked reliable citations. The readability greatly limits its utility. Thus, adequate patient education should be done by orthopedic surgeons. This study underscores the need for patient education resources that are reliable, accessible, and comprehensible.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

摘要

引言

近年来,人工智能(AI)在其应用方面取得了重大进展,基于聊天生成的预训练变换器(ChatGPT)作为一种流行的语言模型正在兴起。本研究的目的是测试ChatGPT对与反肩关节置换术(RSA)相关的常见问题(FAQ)的回答的准确性和可靠性。

方法

从机构患者教育网站查询了十个最常见的常见问题。然后在单个会话中将这十个问题输入聊天机器人,不提供额外的背景信息。然后由两名骨科医生使用《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)基准标准和辨别分数对回答进行批判性分析,以评估清晰度、准确性和循证信息的质量。使用弗莱什-金凯德年级水平分析回答的可读性。

结果

针对这十个问题,平均辨别分数为44(范围为38 - 51)。七个回答被归类为中等,三个回答较差。所有回答的JAMA基准标准分数均为0。此外,平均弗莱什-金凯德年级水平为14.35,这与大学毕业生的阅读水平相关。

结论

总体而言,ChatGPT能够对常见的患者问题提供中等质量的回答。然而,这些回答都是以大学毕业生的阅读水平撰写的,并且缺乏可靠的引用。可读性极大地限制了其效用。因此,骨科医生应该进行充分的患者教育。本研究强调了对可靠、可获取且易于理解的患者教育资源的需求。

证据级别

IV级。

相似文献

1
Can ChatGPT answer patient questions regarding reverse shoulder arthroplasty?ChatGPT能否回答患者关于反肩关节置换术的问题?
J ISAKOS. 2024 Dec;9(6):100323. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100323. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
2
Assessing the Quality and Reliability of ChatGPT's Responses to Radiotherapy-Related Patient Queries: Comparative Study With GPT-3.5 and GPT-4.评估ChatGPT对放疗相关患者问题回答的质量和可靠性:与GPT-3.5和GPT-4的比较研究
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Apr 16;11:e63677. doi: 10.2196/63677.
3
Assessment and comparison of artificial intelligence-generated information regarding shoulder arthroplasty from multiple interfaces.多界面人工智能生成的关于肩关节置换术信息的评估与比较
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 Feb 17. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.048.
4
An Artificial Intelligence Chatbot is an Accurate and Useful Online Patient Resource Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty.人工智能聊天机器人是全膝关节置换术前准确且有用的在线患者资源。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Aug;39(8S1):S358-S362. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.02.005. Epub 2024 Feb 11.
5
Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) - 3.5 Responses Require Advanced Readability for the General Population and May Not Effectively Supplement Patient-Related Information Provided by the Treating Surgeon Regarding Common Questions About Rotator Cuff Repair.聊天生成预训练变换器(ChatGPT)-3.5的回复需要具备较高的易读性才能适用于普通人群,并且可能无法有效补充主治外科医生就肩袖修复常见问题所提供的与患者相关的信息。
Arthroscopy. 2025 Jan;41(1):42-52. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.009. Epub 2024 May 21.
6
Assessing the quality of ChatGPT's responses to commonly asked questions about trigger finger treatment.评估ChatGPT对扳机指治疗常见问题的回答质量。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2025 Apr;31(4):389-393. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2025.32735.
7
Can ChatGPT reliably answer the most common patient questions regarding total shoulder arthroplasty?ChatGPT能否可靠地回答患者关于全肩关节置换术最常见的问题?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 May;34(5):e254-e264. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.025. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
8
Do ChatGPT and Google differ in answers to commonly asked patient questions regarding total shoulder and total elbow arthroplasty?ChatGPT 和谷歌在回答有关全肩和全肘人工关节置换术的常见患者问题方面是否存在差异?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Aug;33(8):e429-e437. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.11.014. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
9
American academy of Orthopedic Surgeons' OrthoInfo provides more readable information regarding meniscus injury than ChatGPT-4 while information accuracy is comparable.美国矫形外科医师学会的OrthoInfo在半月板损伤方面提供了比ChatGPT-4更具可读性的信息,而信息准确性相当。
J ISAKOS. 2025 Apr;11:100843. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2025.100843. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
10
Dr. Google vs. Dr. ChatGPT: Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology by Comparing the Accuracy, Safety, and Readability of Responses to Frequently Asked Patient Questions Regarding Cataracts and Cataract Surgery.谷歌医生与ChatGPT医生:通过比较关于白内障及白内障手术的常见患者问题的回答的准确性、安全性和可读性,探索人工智能在眼科领域的应用。
Semin Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug;39(6):472-479. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2024.2326058. Epub 2024 Mar 22.