文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

ChatGPT 和谷歌在回答有关全肩和全肘人工关节置换术的常见患者问题方面是否存在差异?

Do ChatGPT and Google differ in answers to commonly asked patient questions regarding total shoulder and total elbow arthroplasty?

机构信息

New York Institute of Technology - College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, NY, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine, Huntington, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Aug;33(8):e429-e437. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.11.014. Epub 2024 Jan 3.


DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2023.11.014
PMID:38182023
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs) offer a new potential resource for patient education. The answers by Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT), a LLM AI text bot, to frequently asked questions (FAQs) were compared to answers provided by a contemporary Google search to determine the reliability of information provided by these sources for patient education in upper extremity arthroplasty. METHODS: "Total shoulder arthroplasty" (TSA) and "total elbow arthroplasty" (TEA) were entered into Google Search and ChatGPT 3.0 to determine the ten most FAQs. On Google, the FAQs were obtained through the "people also ask" section, while ChatGPT was asked to provide the ten most FAQs. Each question, answer, and reference(s) cited were recorded. A modified version of the Rothwell system was used to categorize questions into 10 subtopics: special activities, timeline of recovery, restrictions, technical details, cost, indications/management, risks and complications, pain, longevity, and evaluation of surgery. Each reference was categorized into the following groups: commercial, academic, medical practice, single surgeon personal, or social media. Questions for TSA and TEA were combined for analysis and compared between Google and ChatGPT with a 2 sample Z-test for proportions. RESULTS: Overall, most questions were related to procedural indications or management (17.5%). There were no significant differences between Google and ChatGPT between question categories. The majority of references were from academic websites (65%). ChatGPT produced a greater number of academic references compared to Google (80% vs. 50%; P = .047), while Google more commonly provided medical practice references (25% vs. 0%; P = .017). CONCLUSION: In conjunction with patient-physician discussions, AI LLMs may provide a reliable resource for patients. By providing information based on academic references, these tools have the potential to improve health literacy and improved shared decision making for patients searching for information about TSA and TEA. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: With the rising prevalence of AI programs, it is essential to understand how these applications affect patient education in medicine.

摘要

背景:人工智能(AI)和大型语言模型(LLM)为患者教育提供了新的潜在资源。将 Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer(ChatGPT),一种 LLM AI 文本机器人的常见问题解答(FAQ)与当代 Google 搜索提供的答案进行比较,以确定这些来源为上肢关节置换术患者教育提供的信息的可靠性。

方法:在 Google 搜索和 ChatGPT 3.0 中输入“全肩关节置换术”(TSA)和“全肘关节置换术”(TEA),以确定十个最常见的 FAQ。在 Google 上,通过“人们也在问”部分获取 FAQ,而要求 ChatGPT 提供十个最常见的 FAQ。记录每个问题、答案和引用的参考文献。使用修改后的 Rothwell 系统将问题分为 10 个子主题:特殊活动、恢复时间线、限制、技术细节、成本、适应证/管理、风险和并发症、疼痛、寿命和手术评估。每个参考文献归入以下类别:商业、学术、医疗实践、单一外科医生个人或社交媒体。将 TSA 和 TEA 的问题合并进行分析,并在 Google 和 ChatGPT 之间进行 2 样本 Z 检验比较比例。

结果:总体而言,大多数问题与手术适应证或管理有关(17.5%)。Google 和 ChatGPT 之间在问题类别上没有显着差异。参考文献主要来自学术网站(65%)。与 Google 相比,ChatGPT 提供了更多的学术参考文献(80% 对 50%;P=0.047),而 Google 更常见地提供医疗实践参考文献(25% 对 0%;P=0.017)。

结论:结合医患讨论,AI LLM 可能为患者提供可靠的资源。通过提供基于学术参考文献的信息,这些工具有可能提高健康素养,并为寻求 TSA 和 TEA 信息的患者改善共同决策。

临床意义:随着 AI 程序的普及,了解这些应用程序如何影响医学中的患者教育至关重要。

相似文献

[1]
Do ChatGPT and Google differ in answers to commonly asked patient questions regarding total shoulder and total elbow arthroplasty?

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024-8

[2]
Using a Google Web Search Analysis to Assess the Utility of ChatGPT in Total Joint Arthroplasty.

J Arthroplasty. 2023-7

[3]
Understanding How ChatGPT May Become a Clinical Administrative Tool Through an Investigation on the Ability to Answer Common Patient Questions Concerning Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries.

Orthop J Sports Med. 2024-7-31

[4]
Dr. Google vs. Dr. ChatGPT: Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology by Comparing the Accuracy, Safety, and Readability of Responses to Frequently Asked Patient Questions Regarding Cataracts and Cataract Surgery.

Semin Ophthalmol. 2024-8

[5]
ChatGPT-4 Performs Clinical Information Retrieval Tasks Using Consistently More Trustworthy Resources Than Does Google Search for Queries Concerning the Latarjet Procedure.

Arthroscopy. 2025-3

[6]
An Artificial Intelligence Chatbot is an Accurate and Useful Online Patient Resource Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty.

J Arthroplasty. 2024-8

[7]
How Does ChatGPT Use Source Information Compared With Google? A Text Network Analysis of Online Health Information.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024-4-1

[8]
Evaluation of the Performance of Generative AI Large Language Models ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing Chat in Supporting Evidence-Based Dentistry: Comparative Mixed Methods Study.

J Med Internet Res. 2023-12-28

[9]
Using Google web search to analyze and evaluate the application of ChatGPT in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

Front Public Health. 2024

[10]
Use and Application of Large Language Models for Patient Questions Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

J Arthroplasty. 2024-9

引用本文的文献

[1]
Evaluation of Google and ChatGPT responses to common patient questions about scoliosis.

Spine Deform. 2025-8-17

[2]
Generative AI/LLMs for Plain Language Medical Information for Patients, Caregivers and General Public: Opportunities, Risks and Ethics.

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025-7-31

[3]
Adequacy of ChatGPT responses to frequently asked questions about shoulder arthroplasty: is it an appropriate adjunct for patient education?

JSES Int. 2025-2-6

[4]
Can popular AI large language models provide reliable answers to frequently asked questions about rotator cuff tears?

JSES Int. 2024-11-29

[5]
A Future of Self-Directed Patient Internet Research: Large Language Model-Based Tools Versus Standard Search Engines.

Ann Biomed Eng. 2025-5

[6]
ChatGPT's role in alleviating anxiety in total knee arthroplasty consent process: a randomized controlled trial pilot study.

Int J Surg. 2025-3-1

[7]
ChatGPT-4.0 vs. Google: Which Provides More Academic Answers to Patients' Questions on Arthroscopic Meniscus Repair?

Cureus. 2024-12-25

[8]
What are patients asking and reading online? An analysis of online patient searches about treatments for developmental dysplasia of the hip.

J Child Orthop. 2025-1-11

[9]
Examining the Role of Large Language Models in Orthopedics: Systematic Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2024-11-15

[10]
Large language models in patient education: a scoping review of applications in medicine.

Front Med (Lausanne). 2024-10-29

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索