Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, Münster, Germany.
Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Münster, Germany.
Lab Invest. 2024 Oct;104(10):102142. doi: 10.1016/j.labinv.2024.102142. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
Circulating tumor cells and liquid biopsy-based biomarkers might one day play a crucial role in the treatment decision process for patients of several cancer entities. However, clinical studies on liquid biopsy approaches revealed distinct detection rates and thus, different risk scoring for patients. This study delves into the comparison of 2 utilized reverse transcription enzymes, namely, SuperScript IV VILO (VILO) and Sensiscript (SS), aiming to understand their impact on biomarker detection rates. Prostate cancer cell lines were used to assess detection limits, followed by an investigation of biomarker status in clinical liquid biopsy samples of distinct tumor entities. Our findings highlight the superior reverse transcription efficacy of VILO over SS, commonly used in studies employing the AdnaTest platform. The enhanced efficacy of VILO results in a significantly higher number of patients positive for biomarkers. Clinically, the use of a less-sensitive enzyme system may lead to the misclassification of genuinely biomarker-positive patients, potentially altering their prognosis due to inadequate clinical monitoring or inappropriate treatment strategies.
循环肿瘤细胞和基于液体活检的生物标志物有朝一日可能在多种癌症实体患者的治疗决策过程中发挥关键作用。然而,液体活检方法的临床研究显示出不同的检测率,因此,患者的风险评分也不同。本研究深入比较了两种常用的逆转录酶,即 SuperScript IV VILO(VILO)和 Sensiscript(SS),旨在了解它们对生物标志物检测率的影响。我们使用前列腺癌细胞系来评估检测限,然后研究不同肿瘤实体的临床液体活检样本中的生物标志物状态。我们的研究结果强调了 VILO 比在使用 AdnaTest 平台的研究中常用的 SS 具有更高的逆转录功效。VILO 的增强功效导致显著更多的患者生物标志物呈阳性。从临床角度来看,使用敏感性较低的酶系统可能导致真正的生物标志物阳性患者被错误分类,由于缺乏临床监测或不适当的治疗策略,可能会改变他们的预后。