Suppr超能文献

瑞士、德国和英国研究者发起的随机临床试验的资源使用与成本:一项元研究

Resource use and costs of investigator-sponsored randomized clinical trials in Switzerland, Germany, and the United Kingdom: a metaresearch study.

作者信息

Griessbach Alexandra, Speich Benjamin, Amstutz Alain, Hausheer Lena, Covino Manuela, Wnfried Ramirez Hillary, Schandelmaier Stefan, Taji Heravi Ala, Treweek Shaun, Schwenkglenks Matthias, Briel Matthias

机构信息

Clear Methods Center, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Clear Methods Center, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Dec;176:111536. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111536. Epub 2024 Sep 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Conducting high-quality randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is challenging and resource intensive. Funders and academic investigators depend on limited financial resources and, therefore, need empirical data for optimal budget planning. However, current literature lacks detailed empirical data on resource use and costs of investigator-sponsored RCTs. The aim of this study is to systematically collect cost data from investigator-sponsored RCTs from Switzerland, Germany, and the United Kingdom (UK).

METHODS

Principal investigators were asked to share their RCT cost and resource use data and enter it into an online case report form. We assessed cost patterns, cost drivers, and specific cost items, examined costs by study phase (planning-, conduct-, and finalization phase), compared planned with actual RCT costs, and explored differences in cost patterns across countries, medical fields, and intervention types.

RESULTS

We included 93 RCTs which were initiated in Switzerland (n = 53; including eight conducted in low- and lower middle-income countries), Germany (n = 22), and the UK (n = 18). The median total trial cost in our RCT sample was $645,824 [interquartile range (IQR), $269,846-$1,577,924]. The median proportion of the total costs spent for planning phase was 27.5% [IQR, 20.6%-39.7%], for conduct phase 57.3% [IQR, 44.4%-66.3%], and for finalization phase 12.7% [IQR, 8.5%-19.3%] with little variation across countries. The items that contributed most to the total costs were protocol writing (7.2%; IQR 3.8%-10.6%), data management (5.0%; IQR 2.2%-8.1%) and follow-up (4.5%; IQR 2.3%-8.4%). Of the 66 RCTs with an available original budget, 46 (69.7%) exceeded the budget by over 50%. Use of routinely collected data to assess primary outcomes was independently associated with lower per patient- and lower total trial costs.

CONCLUSION

Over a quarter of total trial costs were incurred in the planning phase, which is typically not fully funded. Two-thirds of RCTs exceeded their budget by more than 50%. Investigators and funders should consider empirical cost data to improve budgeting and funding practices.

摘要

背景与目的

开展高质量的随机临床试验(RCT)具有挑战性且资源密集。资助者和学术研究者依赖有限的财政资源,因此需要实证数据来进行最优预算规划。然而,目前的文献缺乏关于研究者发起的RCT的资源使用和成本的详细实证数据。本研究的目的是系统收集来自瑞士、德国和英国研究者发起的RCT的成本数据。

方法

主要研究者被要求分享他们的RCT成本和资源使用数据,并将其录入在线病例报告表。我们评估了成本模式、成本驱动因素和特定成本项目,按研究阶段(规划、实施和收尾阶段)检查成本,比较RCT的计划成本与实际成本,并探讨不同国家、医学领域和干预类型的成本模式差异。

结果

我们纳入了93项RCT,这些试验分别在瑞士发起53项(包括在低收入和中低收入国家开展的8项)、德国22项、英国18项。我们的RCT样本中试验总成本的中位数为645,824美元[四分位间距(IQR),269,846 - 1,577,924美元]。规划阶段成本占总成本的中位数比例为27.5%[IQR,20.6% - 39.7%],实施阶段为57.3%[IQR,44.4% - 66.3%],收尾阶段为12.7%[IQR,8.5% - 19.3%],各国之间差异不大。对总成本贡献最大的项目是方案撰写(7.2%;IQR 3.8% - 10.6%)、数据管理(5.0%;IQR 2.2% - 8.1%)和随访(4.5%;IQR 2.3% - 8.4%)。在有可用原始预算的66项RCT中,46项(69.7%)超出预算超过50%。使用常规收集的数据评估主要结局与较低的人均成本和较低的试验总成本独立相关。

结论

超过四分之一的试验总成本发生在规划阶段,而该阶段通常资金不足。三分之二的RCT超出预算超过50%。研究者和资助者应考虑实证成本数据以改进预算编制和资助实践。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验