Suppr超能文献

瑞士、英国和德国开展的一项关于研究者发起的随机试验资源利用和成本的实证研究的设计和原理。

Design and rationale for an empirical investigation of the resource use and costs of investigator-initiated randomized trials in Switzerland, the UK, and Germany.

机构信息

CLEAR Methods Center, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Department Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Trials. 2024 Oct 7;25(1):662. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08505-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conducting high-quality randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is challenging, time consuming, and resource intense. Academic investigators usually depend on scarce financial resources; however, current literature lacks systematically collected empirical data on the detailed resource use and costs of investigator-initiated RCTs.

METHODS

The aim of this study is to generate a database of detailed empirical resource use and cost data from 100 investigator-initiated RCTs in Switzerland, Germany, and the UK. Investigators enter their empirical costs data into an online data collection form, which is followed by a short interview and a detailed cost report. We plan to investigate cost patterns and cost drivers and examine planned versus actual RCT costs as well as explore different strata of costs across the planning, conduct, and finalization phases, in drug and non-drug trials, and across medical fields and countries.

DISCUSSION

This study will add detailed empirical data to the limited research on investigator-initiated RCT costs currently available. A study limitation will be that cost data will be retrospective and self-reported, which might be inaccurate depending on how costs were recorded.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework (OSF) https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QY2GU . Registered on June 4, 2021.

摘要

背景

开展高质量的随机临床试验(RCTs)具有挑战性,既耗时又耗费资源。学术研究者通常依赖于稀缺的财政资源;然而,目前的文献缺乏对研究者发起的 RCT 详细资源使用和成本的系统收集的经验数据。

方法

本研究的目的是从瑞士、德国和英国的 100 项研究者发起的 RCT 中生成一个详细的经验资源使用和成本数据库。研究者将他们的经验成本数据输入在线数据收集表,随后进行简短的访谈和详细的成本报告。我们计划研究成本模式和成本驱动因素,检查计划与实际 RCT 成本,以及探索不同规划、实施和完成阶段的成本差异,在药物和非药物试验中,并在不同的医学领域和国家之间。

讨论

本研究将为目前有限的研究者发起的 RCT 成本研究增加详细的经验数据。一项研究限制是成本数据将是回顾性和自我报告的,这可能不准确,具体取决于成本的记录方式。

试验注册

开放科学框架(OSF)https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QY2GU 。2021 年 6 月 4 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e04/11457363/5a90b9200605/13063_2024_8505_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验