Evaluating the Effect of Telomere Length on Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer Risk Using Mendelian Randomization.

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to explore the causal relationship between telomere length and Oral and oropharyngeal cancers by using Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.

METHODS

We carried out a 2-sample MR to examine the causal association between telomere length and Oral and oropharyngeal cancers. Two large genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were employed to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as instrumental variables through statistical and biological approaches. The data on SNP-oral and oropharyngeal cancer risk factor associations were sourced from various consortia/UK Biobank. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was employed as the primary approach for overall causal estimation in MR, with sensitivity analyses conducted to assess potential confounding by pleiotropy, heterogeneity, and the leave-one-out analysis.

RESULTS

The statistically driven approach indicates limited evidence of a genetically causal effect of telomere length on the risk of oral cavity cancer (OR = 0.999, 95% CI 0.998-1.000, P = .100), oropharyngeal cancer (OR = 0.999, 95% CI 0.998-1.001, P = .650), combined oral and oropharyngeal cancer (OR = 0.999, 95% CI 0.998-1.000, P = .119) in Europeans. The biologically driven approach demonstrated consistent causal effects across all MR methods, thereby further strengthening the reliability of the results. Moreover, the MR-Egger (Q [df] 170.816 [130], P = .009) and inverse variance weighted methods (Q [df] 171.656 [131], P = .010) identified considerable heterogeneity among instrumental variable estimates in Oral cavity cancer, and no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant causal associations between telomere length and Oral and oropharyngeal cancers were found in this study.