Xu Tao, Yu Jing, Lei Li, Zhang Tiancheng, Zhang Zihua
College of Physical Education and Health, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541000, China.
School of Sports and Health Science, Tongren University, Tongren 554300, China.
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2024 Sep;53(5):701-707. doi: 10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2024.05.003.
Understanding urban-rural differences in the risk of aggregation of adolescents' health-risk behaviors in the Wuling Mountain Area.
From March to May 2023, 7901 adolescents from junior to junior high school and senior high school grades in 32 middle schools in 8 counties(districts) in the Wuling Mountain Area were selected as survey respondents using the multi-stage stratified random cluster sampling method, with the age of the survey respondents being(14.82±1.50) years old. There were 4047 male students(51.22%) and 3854 female students(48.78%), 5126(64.88%) in junior high school and 2775(35.12%) in senior high school.2513(31.81%) in rural schools and 5388(68.19%) in urban schools. The Questionnaire on Health Risky Behaviors of Youth in Wuling Mountain Area was used to investigate 9 health risky behaviors of youth, such as partial feeding, smoking, and drinking alcohol. The χ~2 test was used to test the difference between urban and rural adolescents' risky health behaviors and their multivariate aggregation incidence rates, and to calculate the relative risk(RR) and the actual expected ratio(O/E).
The incidence of bivariate to quintivariate cluster of adolescent health-risk behaviors was lower in all rural schools than in urban schools(χ~2 were 60.73, 34.97, 16.89, and 9.14, P<0.05). Rural school adolescents had the highest RR value for alcohol consumption behavior(18.02), while urban school adolescents had the highest RR value for insomnia behavior(15.05). In the bivariate cluster model, the O/E values for "smoking+alcohol consumption" were highest in both rural(8.18) and urban(6.14) school adolescents. In the trivariate cluster model, the O/E values for "smoking+alcohol consumption+fighting" were highest in both rural(28.41) and urban(18.15) school adolescents. In the quadrivariate cluster model, the O/E values for "smoking+alcohol consumption+insomnia+experiencing school bullying" were highest in rural school adolescents(95.10), while the O/E values for "smoking+alcohol consumption+fighting+experiencing school bullying" were highest in urban school adolescents(42.97). In the quintivariate cluster model, the O/E values for "smoking+alcohol consumption+fighting+insomnia+experiencing school bullying" were highest in both rural(309.57) and urban(129.28) school adolescents.
Adolescents in urban schools in the Wuling Mountain Area are more prone to clustering harmful health behaviors compared to those in rural schools, and there are differences in the clustering risks of harmful health behaviors and their diverse clustering patterns between urban and rural areas.
了解武陵山区青少年健康风险行为聚集风险的城乡差异。
2023年3月至5月,采用多阶段分层随机整群抽样方法,选取武陵山区8个县(区)32所中学初中到高中各年级的7901名青少年作为调查对象,调查对象年龄为(14.82±1.50)岁。其中男生4047名(51.22%),女生3854名(48.78%),初中生5126名(64.88%),高中生2775名(35.12%)。农村学校2513名(31.81%),城市学校5388名(68.19%)。采用《武陵山区青少年健康危险行为调查问卷》对青少年偏食、吸烟、饮酒等9种健康危险行为进行调查。采用χ²检验比较城乡青少年危险健康行为及其多因素聚集发生率的差异,并计算相对危险度(RR)和实际期望比(O/E)。
所有农村学校青少年健康风险行为双因素至五因素聚集的发生率均低于城市学校(χ²值分别为60.73、34.97、16.89和9.14,P<0.05)。农村学校青少年饮酒行为的RR值最高(18.02),而城市学校青少年失眠行为的RR值最高(15.05)。在双因素聚集模型中,“吸烟+饮酒”的O/E值在农村(8.18)和城市(6.14)学校青少年中均最高。在三因素聚集模型中,“吸烟+饮酒+打架”的O/E值在农村(28.41)和城市(18.15)学校青少年中均最高。在四因素聚集模型中,“吸烟+饮酒+失眠+遭受校园欺凌”的O/E值在农村学校青少年中最高(95.10),而“吸烟+饮酒+打架+遭受校园欺凌”的O/E值在城市学校青少年中最高(42.97)。在五因素聚集模型中,“吸烟+饮酒+打架+失眠+遭受校园欺凌”的O/E值在农村(309.57)和城市(129.28)学校青少年中均最高。
武陵山区城市学校青少年比农村学校青少年更易发生有害健康行为聚集,城乡有害健康行为聚集风险及其多种聚集模式存在差异。