• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PI-RADS评分在接受根治性前列腺切除术的前列腺癌男性患者中的预后意义。

Prognostic significance of the PI-RADS score in men with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.

作者信息

Nwanze Julum, Teramoto Yuki, Wang Ying, Miyamoto Hiroshi

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester, NY, USA.

Department of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester, NY, USA.

出版信息

Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2024 Aug 25;12(4):162-172. doi: 10.62347/BODM5001. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.62347/BODM5001
PMID:39308595
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11411178/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

MRI-targeted biopsy (T-Bx) for which Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) assessment categories are useful has been shown to more accurately detect clinically significant prostate cancer. However, the prognostic significance of the PI-RADS in prostate cancer patients needs further investigation. In the present study, we compared radical prostatectomy findings and postoperative oncologic outcomes in men with prostate cancer initially undergoing T-Bx for PI-RADS 3 vs. 4 vs. 5 lesions.

METHODS

We assessed consecutive patients undergoing T-Bx with concurrent systematic biopsy (S-Bx), followed by radical prostatectomy. Within our Surgical Pathology database, we identified a total of 207 men where prostatic adenocarcinoma was detected on either S-Bx or T-Bx, or both.

RESULTS

Prostate cancer was detected on S-Bx only (n = 32; 15%), T-Bx only (n = 39; 19%), or both S-Bx and T-Bx (n = 136; 66%). These patients had PI-RADS 3 (n = 42; 20%), 4 (n = 86; 42%), or 5 (n = 79; 38%) lesions, while T-Bx detected cancer in 31 (74%) of PI-RADS 3 cases, 72 (84%) of PI-RADS 4 cases, and 72 (91%) of PI-RADS 5 cases. There were no significant differences in any of the clinicopathologic features examined, including tumor grade on biopsy or prostatectomy and pT or pN stage, among the PI-RADS 3 vs. 4 vs. 5 groups, except a significantly higher rate of positive margin and significantly larger tumor volume in PI-RADS 5 cases than in PI-RADS 3 cases. Univariate and multivariable analyses revealed significantly higher risks of biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy in patients with PI-RADS 5 lesion than in those with PI-RADS 3 or 4 lesion. Additionally, compared with respective controls, detection of any grade cancer ( = 0.046) or Grade Group 2 or higher cancer ( = 0.005) on T-Bx was associated with a significantly higher risk of recurrence in patients with PI-RADS 5 lesion, but not in those with PI-RADS 3 or 4 lesion.

CONCLUSION

PI-RADS 5 lesions were thus found to independently predict a significantly poorer postoperative prognosis. Moreover, the failure of detection of any grade cancer or clinically significant cancer on T-Bx of PI-RADS 5 lesion may particularly indicate favorable outcomes in radical prostatectomy cases.

摘要

目的

已证实,前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评估类别对MRI靶向活检(T-Bx)检测临床意义重大的前列腺癌更为准确。然而,PI-RADS在前列腺癌患者中的预后意义仍需进一步研究。在本研究中,我们比较了最初因PI-RADS 3、4、5类病变接受T-Bx的前列腺癌男性患者的根治性前列腺切除术结果及术后肿瘤学结局。

方法

我们评估了连续接受T-Bx及同步系统活检(S-Bx),随后接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者。在我们的外科病理学数据库中,我们共识别出207名男性,这些男性在S-Bx或T-Bx或两者中均检测到前列腺腺癌。

结果

仅在S-Bx中检测到前列腺癌(n = 32;15%),仅在T-Bx中检测到(n = 39;19%),或在S-Bx和T-Bx中均检测到(n = 136;66%)。这些患者有PI-RADS 3类(n = 42;20%)、4类(n = 86;42%)或5类(n = 79;38%)病变,而T-Bx在PI-RADS 3类病例的31例(74%)、PI-RADS 4类病例的72例(84%)和PI-RADS 5类病例的72例(91%)中检测到癌症。在PI-RADS 3、4、5组之间,所检查的任何临床病理特征,包括活检或前列腺切除术中的肿瘤分级以及pT或pN分期,均无显著差异,但PI-RADS 5类病例的切缘阳性率显著更高,肿瘤体积显著大于PI-RADS 3类病例。单因素和多因素分析显示,PI-RADS 5类病变患者前列腺切除术后生化复发风险显著高于PI-RADS 3或4类病变患者。此外,与各自的对照组相比,T-Bx检测到任何分级癌症(P = 0.046)或2级及以上分级癌症(P = 0.005)与PI-RADS 5类病变患者的复发风险显著更高相关,但与PI-RADS 3或4类病变患者无关。

结论

因此,发现PI-RADS 5类病变可独立预测术后预后显著较差。此外,PI-RADS 5类病变的T-Bx未检测到任何分级癌症或临床意义重大的癌症,这可能特别表明根治性前列腺切除术病例的预后良好。

相似文献

1
Prognostic significance of the PI-RADS score in men with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.PI-RADS评分在接受根治性前列腺切除术的前列腺癌男性患者中的预后意义。
Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2024 Aug 25;12(4):162-172. doi: 10.62347/BODM5001. eCollection 2024.
2
Radical prostatectomy findings and oncologic outcomes in patients with prostate cancer detected on systematic sextant biopsy only, MRI-targeted biopsy only, or both.仅行系统六区分割式前列腺活检、MRI 靶向活检或两者均行的前列腺癌患者的前列腺切除术发现和肿瘤学结果。
Urol Oncol. 2022 May;40(5):193.e7-193.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.02.010. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
3
Clinical significance of perineural invasion by prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy.前列腺癌磁共振成像靶向活检中神经周围侵犯的临床意义。
Hum Pathol. 2022 Mar;121:65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2022.01.003. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
4
Using Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Scores to Select an Optimal Prostate Biopsy Method: A Secondary Analysis of the Trio Study.利用前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分选择最佳前列腺活检方法:Trio 研究的二次分析。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2022 Apr;5(2):176-186. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.03.004. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
5
Clinical and histopathological parameters in transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies associated with tumor upgrading after radical prostatectomy: A comparative analysis of risk groups.经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检与根治性前列腺切除术后肿瘤升级相关的临床和组织病理学参数:风险组的对比分析。
Prostate. 2024 Sep;84(12):1146-1156. doi: 10.1002/pros.24751. Epub 2024 May 27.
6
PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.在 3.0T 多参数前列腺磁共振成像的 PI-RADS 版本 2 分类中,活检中 Gleason 评分 3+4 的前列腺癌具有预测肿瘤学结果的作用。
J Urol. 2019 Jan;201(1):91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.08.043.
7
Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分与指数病变和多灶性、临床显著前列腺癌的相关性。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 May;1(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 May 15.
8
Transcriptome Wide Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy and Matching Surgical Specimens from High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: The Target Must Be Hit.基于 MRI 靶向穿刺和高风险前列腺癌根治术患者手术标本的转录组全分析:靶向必须命中。
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Jul;4(4):540-546. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
9
Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates between magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in patients with PSA ≥4 ng/mL: a systematic review and meta-analysis.根据前列腺影像报告和数据系统,对PSA≥4 ng/mL患者进行磁共振成像靶向活检与经直肠超声引导活检的前列腺癌检出率比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Dec;8(6):741-753. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.03.
10
PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.PI-RADS 版本 2 类别在 3.0T 多参数前列腺磁共振成像预测活检中 Gleason 3+4 前列腺癌的肿瘤学结果。
J Urol. 2019 Jan;201(1):91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.08.043.

引用本文的文献

1
MRI-Derived Tumor Characteristics As Prognostic Indicators in Prostate Cancer With Bone Metastases: A Preliminary Study.MRI衍生的肿瘤特征作为前列腺癌骨转移预后指标的初步研究
Cureus. 2025 Jun 26;17(6):e86829. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86829. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification by Simple Scoring of the Current pT3 Lesions: A Proposal for a New Pathologic T-Staging System.基于当前 pT3 病变的简单评分进行前列腺癌风险分层:新病理 T 分期系统的建议。
Mod Pathol. 2024 Mar;37(3):100429. doi: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100429. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
2
2022 Update on Prostate Cancer Epidemiology and Risk Factors-A Systematic Review.2022 年前列腺癌流行病学和风险因素的更新:系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2023 Aug;84(2):191-206. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.021. Epub 2023 May 16.
3
Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline Part I: Prostate Cancer Screening.早期前列腺癌检测:AUA/SUO 指南第 I 部分:前列腺癌筛查。
J Urol. 2023 Jul;210(1):46-53. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003491. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
4
Radical prostatectomy findings and oncologic outcomes in patients with prostate cancer detected on systematic sextant biopsy only, MRI-targeted biopsy only, or both.仅行系统六区分割式前列腺活检、MRI 靶向活检或两者均行的前列腺癌患者的前列腺切除术发现和肿瘤学结果。
Urol Oncol. 2022 May;40(5):193.e7-193.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.02.010. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
5
Clinical significance of perineural invasion by prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy.前列腺癌磁共振成像靶向活检中神经周围侵犯的临床意义。
Hum Pathol. 2022 Mar;121:65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2022.01.003. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
6
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: an Updated Systematic Review.多参数磁共振成像在临床显著前列腺癌诊断中的应用:一项更新的系统评价。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2021 Dec;33(12):e599-e612. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.07.016. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
7
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
8
EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG 前列腺癌指南-2020 版更新。第 1 部分:筛查、诊断和以治愈为目的的局部治疗。
Eur Urol. 2021 Feb;79(2):243-262. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
9
Prognostic Implications of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Concomitant Systematic Biopsy in Predicting Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy.磁共振成像多参数分析及系统活检对经磁共振成像靶向活检诊断前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的预测价值
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Dec;3(6):739-747. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.07.008. Epub 2020 Aug 23.
10
The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference on Prostate Cancer Grading.2019年国际泌尿病理学会前列腺癌分级共识会议
Eur Urol. 2021 Jun;79(6):707-709. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Aug 23.