• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PI-RADS 版本 2 类别在 3.0T 多参数前列腺磁共振成像预测活检中 Gleason 3+4 前列腺癌的肿瘤学结果。

PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.

机构信息

Institute of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

Department of Medicine Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

J Urol. 2019 Jan;201(1):91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.08.043.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2018.08.043
PMID:30577397
Abstract

PURPOSE

Three Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging with PI-RADS™ (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) version 2 scoring is a common tool in prostate cancer diagnosis which informs the likelihood of a cancerous lesion. We investigated whether PI-RADS version 2 also predicts adverse pathology features mainly in patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 4 disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the records of 326 consecutive men with a preoperative template and/or magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion biopsy Gleason score of 6-7 from a prospectively maintained database of men who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy. The primary analysis was done in patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 4 to assess the primary outcome of adverse pathology features on univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The secondary outcome was biochemical recurrence-free survival using the Kaplan-Meier method. Similar analysis was done in patients with a biopsy Gleason score of 6-7.

RESULTS

Of men with Gleason score 3 + 4 findings 27%, 15%, 36% and 23% showed a PI-RADS version 2 score of 0-2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively. On univariate analysis PI-RADS version 2 category 5 predicted adverse pathology features vs categories 0-2 (OR 10.7, 95% CI 3.7-31, p ≤0.001). On multivariate analysis the PI-RADS version 2 category 5 was associated with adverse pathology when adjusting for preoperative magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy (OR 11.4, 95% CI 3.7-35, p ≤0.0001). In men with a targeted biopsy Gleason score of 3 + 4 prostate cancer PI-RADS version 2 category 5 was associated with adverse pathology (OR 14.7, 95% CI 1.5-146.9, p = 0.02). Of men with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 4 disease 92% and 58% with a PI-RADS version 2 score of 4 and 5, respectively, had 2-year biochemical recurrence-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

A PI-RADS version 2 category 5 lesion in patients with a biopsy Gleason score 3 + 4 lesion predicted adverse pathology features and biochemical recurrence-free survival. These findings suggest that preoperative 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging may serve as a prognostic marker of treatment outcomes independently of biopsy Gleason score or biopsy type.

摘要

目的

三特斯拉多参数磁共振成像与 PI-RADS™(前列腺影像报告和数据系统)第 2 版评分是前列腺癌诊断中的常用工具,可告知癌性病变的可能性。我们研究了 PI-RADS 第 2 版是否也可预测主要在活检 Gleason 评分 3+4 疾病患者中的不良病理特征。

材料与方法

我们回顾了 326 例连续男性患者的记录,这些患者来自前瞻性维护的数据库,数据库中包含接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的男性,他们在术前模板和/或磁共振成像-超声融合活检中具有 Gleason 评分 6-7。主要分析是在活检 Gleason 评分 3+4 的患者中进行的,以评估单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析中的不良病理特征的主要结局。次要结局是使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法评估生化无复发生存率。在活检 Gleason 评分 6-7 的患者中也进行了类似的分析。

结果

在具有 Gleason 评分 3+4 发现的男性中,分别有 27%、15%、36%和 23%的患者 PI-RADS 第 2 版评分为 0-2、3、4 和 5。在单变量分析中,PI-RADS 第 2 版类别 5 预测与类别 0-2(OR 10.7,95%CI 3.7-31,p≤0.001)相比具有不良病理特征。在多变量分析中,当调整术前磁共振成像靶向活检时,PI-RADS 第 2 版类别 5 与不良病理相关(OR 11.4,95%CI 3.7-35,p≤0.0001)。在具有靶向活检 Gleason 评分 3+4 前列腺癌的男性中,PI-RADS 第 2 版类别 5 与不良病理相关(OR 14.7,95%CI 1.5-146.9,p=0.02)。在具有活检 Gleason 评分 3+4 疾病的男性中,分别有 92%和 58%的患者 PI-RADS 第 2 版评分 4 和 5 具有 2 年生化无复发生存率。

结论

PI-RADS 第 2 版类别 5 病变在活检 Gleason 评分 3+4 病变患者中预测不良病理特征和生化无复发生存率。这些发现表明,术前 3 特斯拉多参数磁共振成像可作为独立于活检 Gleason 评分或活检类型的治疗结果的预后标志物。

相似文献

1
PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.PI-RADS 版本 2 类别在 3.0T 多参数前列腺磁共振成像预测活检中 Gleason 3+4 前列腺癌的肿瘤学结果。
J Urol. 2019 Jan;201(1):91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.08.043.
2
PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.在 3.0T 多参数前列腺磁共振成像的 PI-RADS 版本 2 分类中,活检中 Gleason 评分 3+4 的前列腺癌具有预测肿瘤学结果的作用。
J Urol. 2019 Jan;201(1):91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.08.043.
3
Pathological and 3 Tesla Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predictors of Biochemical Recurrence after Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Correlation with Whole Mount Histopathology.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的病理和 3 特斯拉容积磁共振成像预测因子:与全组织病理学的相关性。
J Urol. 2018 May;199(5):1218-1223. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.10.042. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
4
Prospective Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Prostate Cancer Detection.前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2 版在前列腺癌检测中的前瞻性评估。
J Urol. 2016 Sep;196(3):690-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.04.057. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
5
Prospective Evaluation of PI-RADS™ Version 2 Using the International Society of Urological Pathology Prostate Cancer Grade Group System.PI-RADS™ 版本 2 的前瞻性评估:采用国际泌尿病理学会前列腺癌分级分组系统。
J Urol. 2017 Sep;198(3):583-590. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.03.131. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
6
The Prognostic Association of Prostate MRI PI-RADS™ v2 Assessment Category and Risk of Biochemical Recurrence after Definitive Local Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.前列腺 MRI PI-RADS™ v2 评估类别与前列腺癌根治性局部治疗后生化复发风险的预后相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Urol. 2021 Sep;206(3):507-516. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001821. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
7
Prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with PI-RADS version 2 in prostate cancers: initial results.基于 PI-RADS 版本 2 预测前列腺癌根治术后的生化复发:初步结果。
Eur Radiol. 2016 Aug;26(8):2502-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4077-5. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
8
Validation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.前列腺影像报告和数据系统第 2 版用于前列腺癌检测的验证。
J Urol. 2018 Oct;200(4):767-773. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 5.
9
A 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score Assay Provides Independent Information on Adverse Pathology in the Setting of Combined Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted and Systematic Prostate Biopsy.17 基因基因组前列腺评分检测在联合多参数磁共振成像融合靶向和系统前列腺活检的情况下提供不良病理的独立信息。
J Urol. 2018 Sep;200(3):564-572. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
10
Risk Stratification of Equivocal Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate.前列腺多参数磁共振成像可疑病灶的风险分层。
J Urol. 2018 Mar;199(3):691-698. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.09.074. Epub 2017 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The Utility of Transperineal Template Saturation Biopsy in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.经会阴模板饱和活检在检测临床显著前列腺癌中的应用
Adv Urol. 2025 Mar 5;2025:9961847. doi: 10.1155/aiu/9961847. eCollection 2025.
2
Effect of prostate volume on the predictive value of prostate-specific antigen density for prostate cancer.前列腺体积对前列腺特异性抗原密度预测前列腺癌的价值的影响。
Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Jan 31;14(1):70-80. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-490. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
3
A deep learning model, NAFNet, predicts adverse pathology and recurrence in prostate cancer using MRIs.
一种深度学习模型NAFNet,利用磁共振成像(MRI)预测前列腺癌的不良病理和复发情况。
NPJ Precis Oncol. 2023 Dec 11;7(1):134. doi: 10.1038/s41698-023-00481-x.
4
Nanoribbon Biosensor-Based Detection of microRNA Markers of Prostate Cancer.基于纳米带生物传感器的前列腺癌 microRNA 标志物检测。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Aug 30;23(17):7527. doi: 10.3390/s23177527.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI- and microultrasound-targeted biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients with a PI-RADS 5 lesion: a single-institutional study.多参数 MRI 和微超声靶向活检在 PI-RADS 5 病变活检初治患者中的诊断准确性:单机构研究。
World J Urol. 2023 Sep;41(9):2335-2342. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04480-2. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
6
Performance of apparent diffusion coefficient values and ratios for the prediction of prostate cancer aggressiveness across different MRI acquisition settings.在不同 MRI 采集设置下,表观扩散系数值和比值对预测前列腺癌侵袭性的性能。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2022 Jan;28(1):12-20. doi: 10.5152/dir.2022.20732.
7
Prognostic Features of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy Based on Multiparametric MRI and Immunohistochemistry Analysis of MRI-guided Biopsy Specimens.基于多参数MRI及MRI引导下活检标本免疫组化分析的前列腺癌根治术后生化复发的预后特征
Radiology. 2021 Jun;299(3):613-623. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021202425. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
8
MRI Characteristics Accurately Predict Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy.磁共振成像特征准确预测前列腺癌根治术后生化复发
J Clin Med. 2020 Nov 26;9(12):3841. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123841.
9
Selecting Patients with Favorable Risk, Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer for Active Surveillance-Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Have a Role?选择风险良好、分级分组 2 的前列腺癌患者进行主动监测——磁共振成像有作用吗?
J Urol. 2021 Apr;205(4):1063-1068. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001519. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
10
A radiomics machine learning-based redefining score robustly identifies clinically significant prostate cancer in equivocal PI-RADS score 3 lesions.基于放射组学机器学习的重新定义评分在 PI-RADS 评分 3 类可疑病变中稳健地识别出有临床意义的前列腺癌。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Dec;45(12):4223-4234. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02678-1. Epub 2020 Aug 1.