Wang Shuai, Luo Xiao, Zang Xinlei, Ma Yiqing, Yang Juan
Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.
Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality, Ministry of Education, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2024 Jul-Sep;24(3):100499. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100499. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
As two typical types of social rewards, both value affirmation and emotional support could alleviate acute stress response, but it is not clear whether they can impact stress circuit function and regulation through different neural pathways.
Sixty-two participants were randomly assigned to the value affirmation, emotional support, and non-reward conditions, then administered an adapted version of the ScanSTRESS paradigm. Participants' subjective reports of uncontrollability and social evaluative threat were measured to explore the mitigation of stress by social rewards at the behavioral level. Meanwhile, their acute salivary cortisol response to stress was compared among different social reward conditions. Furthermore, we computed linear contrasts for performance (vs relaxation) and reward (vs non-reward) and used psychophysiological interaction (PPI) analysis to explore the impact of social reward on stress circuit function and regulation.
Both value affirmation and emotional support conditions reduced subjective reports of uncontrollability and social evaluation threat, but not cortisol response to stress. Furthermore, value affirmation reduced uncontrollability by enhancing putamen activation, whereas emotional support reduced social evaluation threat by enhancing putamen activation. More importantly, during stress, value affirmation enhanced the functional connectivity of the putamen-hippocampus and putamen-angular gyrus (AG), whereas emotional support enhanced the functional connectivity of the putamen-ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC) and putamen-temporal pole mid, compared to the non-reward condition.
Value affirmation and emotional support alleviated acute stress response in different neural pathways. These findings suggested a precise categorization of social reward in intervention of a range of adverse psychological and physiological responses caused by stress.
作为两种典型的社会奖励类型,价值肯定和情感支持都可以减轻急性应激反应,但它们是否能通过不同的神经通路影响应激回路功能和调节尚不清楚。
62名参与者被随机分配到价值肯定、情感支持和无奖励条件组,然后接受改编版的ScanSTRESS范式。测量参与者对不可控性和社会评价威胁的主观报告,以在行为层面探索社会奖励对应激的缓解作用。同时,比较不同社会奖励条件下他们对应激的急性唾液皮质醇反应。此外,我们计算了表现(与放松相比)和奖励(与无奖励相比)的线性对比,并使用心理生理交互作用(PPI)分析来探索社会奖励对应激回路功能和调节的影响。
价值肯定和情感支持条件均降低了对不可控性和社会评价威胁的主观报告,但未降低对应激的皮质醇反应。此外,价值肯定通过增强壳核激活来降低不可控性,而情感支持通过增强壳核激活来降低社会评价威胁。更重要的是,与无奖励条件相比,在应激期间,价值肯定增强了壳核-海马体和壳核-角回(AG)的功能连接,而情感支持增强了壳核-腹外侧前额叶皮质(vlPFC)和壳核-颞极中部的功能连接。
价值肯定和情感支持通过不同的神经通路减轻急性应激反应。这些发现为社会奖励在干预一系列由应激引起的不良心理和生理反应中的精确分类提供了依据。