Qiao Jirong, Zheng Jiahua, Li Shaoyu, Zhang Feng, Zhang Bin, Zhao Mengli
Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources of the Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Forage Cultivation, Processing and High Efficient Utilization of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Grassland Management and Utilization, College of Grassland, Resources and Environment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Front Microbiol. 2024 Sep 6;15:1458777. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1458777. eCollection 2024.
Grazer exclosure is widely regarded as an effective measure for restoring degraded grasslands, having positive effects on soil microbial diversity. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) predicts that global surface temperatures will increase by 1.5-4.5°C by the end of the 21st century, which may affect restoration practices for degraded grasslands. This inevitability highlights the urgent need to study the effect of temperature on grassland soil microbial communities, given their critical ecological functions.
Here, we assessed the effects of heavy grazing (control), grazer exclosure, and grazer exclosure plus warming by 1.5°C on soil microbial community diversity and network properties as well as their relationships to soil physicochemical properties.
Our results showed that grazer closure increased soil microbial richness relative to heavy grazing controls. Specifically, bacterial richness increased by 7.9%, fungal richness increased by 20.2%, and the number of fungal network nodes and edges increased without altering network complexity and stability. By contrast, grazer exclosure plus warming decreased bacterial richness by 9.2% and network complexity by 12.4% compared to heavy grazing controls, while increasing fungal network complexity by 25.8%. Grazer exclosure without warming increased soil ammonium nitrogen content, while warming increased soil nitrate nitrogen content. Soil pH and organic carbon were not affected by either exclosure strategy, but nitrate nitrogen was the dominant soil factor explaining changes in bacterial communities.
Our findings show that grazer exclosure increases soil microbial diversity which are effective soil restoration measures for degraded desert steppe, but this effect is weakened under warming conditions. Thus, global climate change should be considered when formulating restoration measures for degraded grasslands.
围栏禁牧被广泛认为是恢复退化草原的有效措施,对土壤微生物多样性具有积极影响。政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)预测,到21世纪末全球地表温度将上升1.5 - 4.5°C,这可能会影响退化草原的恢复实践。鉴于草原土壤微生物群落具有关键的生态功能,这种必然性凸显了研究温度对其影响的迫切需求。
在此,我们评估了重度放牧(对照)、围栏禁牧以及围栏禁牧加1.5°C升温对土壤微生物群落多样性、网络特性及其与土壤理化性质关系的影响。
我们的结果表明,与重度放牧对照相比,围栏禁牧增加了土壤微生物丰富度。具体而言,细菌丰富度增加了7.9%,真菌丰富度增加了20.2%,真菌网络节点和边的数量增加,而网络复杂性和稳定性未改变。相比之下,与重度放牧对照相比,围栏禁牧加升温使细菌丰富度降低了9.2%,网络复杂性降低了12.4%,同时真菌网络复杂性增加了25.8%。未升温的围栏禁牧增加了土壤铵态氮含量,而升温增加了土壤硝态氮含量。土壤pH值和有机碳不受任何一种禁牧策略的影响,但硝态氮是解释细菌群落变化的主要土壤因子。
我们的研究结果表明,围栏禁牧增加了土壤微生物多样性,是退化荒漠草原有效的土壤恢复措施,但在升温条件下这种效果会减弱。因此,在制定退化草原的恢复措施时应考虑全球气候变化。