Chongqing Center for Evidence-Based Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Chongqing, 400020, People's Republic of China.
Outpatient Department, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400030, People's Republic of China.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024 Sep 16;19:2035-2050. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S476256. eCollection 2024.
While the benefits of exercises for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are well-established, the relative effectiveness of different exercise types for stable COPD remains unclear. This network meta-analysis aims to investigate the comparative effects of aerobic exercise (AE), resistance training (RT), endurance training (ET), and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in stable COPD.
Electronic searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of exercises on 6-minute walk test distance (6MWD), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and forced vital capacity (FVC), and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score. Two authors screened the retrieved articles, extracted relevant data, and assessed the risk of bias. Network meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 14.0.
This study included a total of 19 studies involving 951 patients with stable COPD. HIIT emerged as the most favorable exercise type for enhancing 6MWD, with a probability of 82.9%. RT exhibited the greatest efficacy in reducing SGRQ scores, with probability of 49.8%. Notably, ET demonstrated superiority in improving FEV1 and FVC, with probabilities of being most effective at 78.1% and 42.0%, respectively.
This study suggests that HIIT may be a viable intervention for improving exercise capacity in stable COPD patients, compared to AE, RR, and ET. RT may hold promise for improving quality of life, and ET may demonstrate superiority in improving pulmonary function. However, variation in response likely depends on patient characteristics, program parameters, and delivery context. Future research should explore the synergistic effects of combining RT with ET/HIIT, focusing on patient subgroups, optimal dosing, and settings, as current guidelines indicate this combination may offer the most significant benefits.
虽然运动对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的益处已得到充分证实,但不同运动类型对稳定期 COPD 的相对有效性仍不清楚。本网络荟萃分析旨在研究有氧运动(AE)、抗阻训练(RT)、耐力训练(ET)和高强度间歇训练(HIIT)对稳定期 COPD 的比较效果。
在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆中进行电子检索,以确定有关运动对 6 分钟步行测试距离(6MWD)、一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)和用力肺活量(FVC)以及圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)评分影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。两位作者筛选检索到的文章,提取相关数据,并评估偏倚风险。使用 Stata 14.0 进行网络荟萃分析。
本研究共纳入 19 项研究,共纳入 951 例稳定期 COPD 患者。HIIT 作为提高 6MWD 的最有利运动类型,概率为 82.9%。RT 在降低 SGRQ 评分方面最有效,概率为 49.8%。值得注意的是,ET 在改善 FEV1 和 FVC 方面具有优势,有效概率分别为 78.1%和 42.0%。
与 AE、RR 和 ET 相比,HIIT 可能是改善稳定期 COPD 患者运动能力的可行干预措施。RT 可能对改善生活质量有希望,ET 可能在改善肺功能方面具有优势。然而,反应的差异可能取决于患者特征、方案参数和实施环境。未来的研究应探索 RT 与 ET/HIIT 相结合的协同作用,重点关注患者亚组、最佳剂量和环境,因为目前的指南表明这种结合可能带来最大的益处。