Suppr超能文献

主动压缩-减压心肺复苏、阻抗阈值装置和头高位心肺复苏联合应用于成人院外心脏骤停的有效性:一项系统评价

Effectiveness of combinations of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation, impedance threshold devices and head-up cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review.

作者信息

Main Shona E, Sidebottom David B, Deakin Charles D, Raitt James, Pocock Helen, Hannah Julian, Plumb James O M

机构信息

University Hospitals Dorset, United Kingdom.

University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Resusc Plus. 2024 Sep 9;20:100760. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100760. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This review summarises the current evidence base for combinations of neuroprotective CPR adjuncts (active compression-decompression chest compressions, impedance threshold devices, and head-up positioning) during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

METHODS

A systematic search (PROSPERO registration CRD42023432302) was performed in English on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library in August 2023, and repeated in February 2024. All randomised and observational studies (not abstracts) reporting on any combination of the aforementioned CPR adjuncts were included. Papers were screened independently by two researchers, with a third reviewer acting as tiebreaker. Out-of-hospital, non-traumatic, cardiac arrests in patients >18 years were eligible for inclusion. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

RESULTS

Eight of 1172 unique articles identified in the initial searches were included, with five randomised controlled trials and three observational studies. No randomised trial investigated a bundle of all three interventions. All randomised controlled trials were at intermediate or high risk of bias. Neurologically favourable survival was greater in patients treated with an impedance threshold device and active compression-decompression CPR when compared to standard CPR (8.9% vs 5.8%,  = 0.019) in the largest existing randomised trial. Conflicting results were found in observational studies comparing the complete neuroprotective bundle to standard CPR.

CONCLUSIONS

This review was limited by small study numbers and overlapping samples, which precluded a meta-analysis. Limited data suggests that combinations of adjuncts to improve cerebral perfusion during CPR may improve survival with favourable neurological outcome. A randomised controlled trial is required to establish whether combining all three together results in improved outcomes.

摘要

目的

本综述总结了院外心脏骤停期间神经保护性心肺复苏辅助措施(主动按压-减压胸外按压、阻抗阈值装置和头高位)联合使用的现有证据基础。

方法

2023年8月在MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆进行了英文系统检索(PROSPERO注册号CRD42023432302),并于2024年2月重复检索。纳入所有报告上述任何心肺复苏辅助措施组合的随机和观察性研究(非摘要)。由两名研究人员独立筛选论文,第三名审稿人作为仲裁者。纳入18岁以上患者的院外非创伤性心脏骤停。使用偏倚风险2工具和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估偏倚风险。

结果

在初步检索中确定的1172篇独特文章中有8篇被纳入,其中包括5项随机对照试验和3项观察性研究。没有随机试验研究所有三种干预措施的组合。所有随机对照试验均处于中度或高度偏倚风险。在现有最大的随机试验中,与标准心肺复苏相比,使用阻抗阈值装置和主动按压-减压心肺复苏治疗的患者神经功能良好的生存率更高(8.9%对5.8%,P = 0.019)。在比较完整神经保护组合与标准心肺复苏的观察性研究中发现了相互矛盾的结果。

结论

本综述受研究数量少和样本重叠的限制,无法进行荟萃分析。有限的数据表明,心肺复苏期间改善脑灌注的辅助措施组合可能会提高生存率并获得良好的神经功能结局。需要进行一项随机对照试验来确定将这三种措施联合使用是否能改善结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2c6/11413749/157fd589456a/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验