Boza Juan M, Manning Jason Cade, Erickson David C
Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850, United States.
Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850, United States.
ACS Omega. 2024 Aug 30;9(37):38855-38863. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c05025. eCollection 2024 Sep 17.
Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) has gained particular attention for point-of-care (POC) applications due to its advantages over traditional nucleic acid testing approaches. However, a prevailing limitation of LAMP in POC applications is nucleic acid extraction from the sample prior to analysis. This is particularly true for complex samples such as submillimeter skin biopsies where lysis and digestion involve intricate and lengthy procedures. The objective of this study was to compare alternative methodologies against the spin-column laboratory standard and evaluate them based on the World Health Organization ASSURED criteria for POC testing. Four methods-magnetic bead extraction, alkaline extraction, proteinase K-heat inactivation extraction, and boiling method extraction-were optimized utilizing porcine skin submillimeter punch biopsies and subsequently validated on human skin. Results show that both alkaline extraction and proteinase K-heat inactivation produce DNA yields equivalent to or higher than the spin-column method in porcine and human skin. When evaluated against the ASSURED criteria, both methods demonstrated low complexity while being highly scalable and readily accessible. Overall, this comparative study established a robust framework for selecting DNA extraction methods for submillimeter skin biopsies in POC applications. It also underscored the performance of the alkaline extraction method based on the ASSURED criteria, providing equivalent DNA yields to laboratory standards with reduced complexity and potential for cost-effective scalability.
环介导等温扩增技术(LAMP)因其相较于传统核酸检测方法的优势,在即时检测(POC)应用中受到了特别关注。然而,LAMP在POC应用中的一个普遍限制是在分析前需要从样本中提取核酸。对于诸如亚毫米皮肤活检等复杂样本来说尤其如此,其中裂解和消化过程涉及复杂且冗长的程序。本研究的目的是将替代方法与实验室标准的离心柱法进行比较,并根据世界卫生组织的POC检测ASSURED标准对其进行评估。利用猪皮亚毫米打孔活检样本对磁珠提取法、碱性提取法、蛋白酶K热灭活提取法和煮沸法提取这四种方法进行了优化,并随后在人体皮肤上进行了验证。结果表明,碱性提取法和蛋白酶K热灭活提取法在猪皮和人体皮肤中产生的DNA产量与离心柱法相当或更高。根据ASSURED标准进行评估时,这两种方法都显示出低复杂性,同时具有高度可扩展性且易于获取。总体而言,这项比较研究为在POC应用中选择亚毫米皮肤活检的DNA提取方法建立了一个稳健的框架。它还强调了基于ASSURED标准的碱性提取法的性能,该方法可提供与实验室标准相当的DNA产量,同时降低了复杂性并具有成本效益高的可扩展性潜力。