Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Ophthalmology, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.
Can Med Educ J. 2024 Aug 30;15(4):50-55. doi: 10.36834/cmej.77188. eCollection 2024 Aug.
As competency-based medical education (CBME) curricula are introduced in residency programs across Canada, systematic evaluation efforts are needed to ensure fidelity of implementation. This study evaluated early outcomes of CBME implementation in one Canadian Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation program that was an early adopter of CBME, with an aim to inform continuous quality improvement initiatives and CBME implementation nationwide.
Using Rapid Evaluation methodology, informed by the CBME Core Components Framework, the intended outcomes of CBME were compared to actual outcomes.
Results suggested that a culture of feedback and coaching already existed in this program prior to CBME implementation, yet faculty felt that CBME added a framework to support feedback. The small program size was valuable in fostering strong relationships and individualized learning. However, participants expressed concerns about CBME fostering a reductionist approach to the development of competence. Challenges existed with direct observation, clear expectations for off-service training experiences, and tracking trainee progress. There was trepidation surrounding national curricular change, yet the institution-wide approach to CBME implementation created shared experiences and a community of practice.
Program evaluation can help understand gaps between planned versus enacted implementation of CBME, and foster adaptations to improve the fidelity of implementation.
随着基于能力的医学教育(CBME)课程在加拿大各地的住院医师培训计划中推出,需要进行系统的评估工作,以确保实施的保真度。本研究评估了加拿大物理医学与康复项目中 CBME 早期实施的结果,该项目是 CBME 的早期采用者,旨在为全国范围内的持续质量改进计划和 CBME 实施提供信息。
使用快速评估方法,参考 CBME 核心组件框架,将 CBME 的预期结果与实际结果进行比较。
结果表明,在实施 CBME 之前,该项目已经存在反馈和指导的文化,但教师认为 CBME 为支持反馈提供了一个框架。项目规模较小有利于培养紧密的关系和个性化的学习。然而,参与者对 CBME 培养能力的简化方法表示担忧。在直接观察、明确服务外培训经验的期望以及跟踪学员进展方面存在挑战。围绕国家课程改革存在担忧,但 CBME 实施的全机构方法创造了共享经验和实践社区。
项目评估有助于了解 CBME 计划实施与实际实施之间的差距,并促进适应性调整,以提高实施的保真度。