Suppr超能文献

社会人口统计学以及知识、态度和行为(KAP)对糖尿病患者二甲双胍使用误解的影响:南亚地区存在的潜在误区与怀疑

Impact of Socio-Demographics and Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) on Misconceptions of Metformin Use in Diabetes: A Potential Myth and Disbelief in South Asia.

作者信息

Chanika Rangani Liyana Arachchi, Mendis Balapuwaduge Isuru Layan M, Rajapakse Harshini, Dissanayake Arosha

机构信息

Department of Nursing, University of Ruhuna, Galle, LKA.

Department of Medicine, University of Ruhuna, Galle, LKA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Aug 22;16(8):e67509. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67509. eCollection 2024 Aug.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The influence of misconceptions and related socio-demographics on metformin use could hamper adherence to medications. This study aimed to assess the rates and causes of metformin non-adherence and to investigate knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) on misconceptions of metformin use including the association with socio-demographic variables.

METHODS

An observational analytical cross-sectional study was conducted at the diabetes clinic of Karapitiya Teaching Hospital in Galle, Sri Lanka. Causes of metformin non-adherence, associations with socio-demographics, and KAP on misconceptions on metformin use were assessed using the chi-squared test, t-tests, and ANOVA using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0 (Released 2019; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) (p<0.05).

RESULTS

Metformin non-adherence was reported as 55%. Use of complementary and alternative therapies was 14.7%. Fear of major organ failure was the commonest (20.5%) reason quoted within the non-adherence group (N=223). Socio-demographic factors like ethnicity, lower education, unemployment, use of complementary and alternative therapies, and obtaining medications for other diabetes-related diseases significantly influenced adherence to the metformin-prescribed doses (p<0.05). Among all participants (N=400), the most common misconception was that long-term use of metformin caused organ damage (kidney 72.5%, liver 64.3%, and heart 34.8%), while 44% believed higher doses (two tablets or more for a day) caused organ damage. The KAP scores were reported as 24.5% with low, 52.7% moderate, and 22.7% satisfactory levels. Significantly lower KAP scores were associated with lower education levels and patients obtaining complementary and alternative therapies (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Misconceptions are not merely kept in mind but lead to non-adherence with metformin doses prescribed and warrant evidence-based educational interventions with the high-risk groups.

摘要

背景

错误观念及相关社会人口统计学因素对二甲双胍使用的影响可能会妨碍药物依从性。本研究旨在评估二甲双胍不依从的发生率及原因,并调查对二甲双胍使用错误观念的知识、态度和行为(KAP),包括与社会人口统计学变量的关联。

方法

在斯里兰卡加勒市卡拉皮蒂亚教学医院的糖尿病诊所进行了一项观察性分析横断面研究。使用卡方检验、t检验和方差分析(ANOVA),通过IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows 26.0版(2019年发布;IBM公司,美国纽约州阿蒙克)评估二甲双胍不依从的原因、与社会人口统计学的关联以及对二甲双胍使用错误观念的KAP(p<0.05)。

结果

据报告二甲双胍不依从率为55%。使用补充和替代疗法的比例为14.7%。在不依从组(N = 223)中,最常见的原因是担心主要器官衰竭(20.5%)。种族、低教育水平、失业、使用补充和替代疗法以及为其他糖尿病相关疾病获取药物等社会人口统计学因素显著影响了二甲双胍规定剂量的依从性(p<0.05)。在所有参与者(N = 400)中,最常见的错误观念是长期使用二甲双胍会导致器官损伤(肾脏72.5%、肝脏64.3%、心脏34.8%),而44%的人认为高剂量(一天两片或更多)会导致器官损伤。KAP得分报告为低水平24.5%、中等水平52.7%、满意水平22.7%。较低的KAP得分与较低的教育水平以及使用补充和替代疗法的患者显著相关(p<0.05)。

结论

错误观念不仅会被记住,还会导致不依从规定的二甲双胍剂量,因此有必要对高危人群进行基于证据的教育干预。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74eb/11416206/f089eeb32ce2/cureus-0016-00000067509-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验