Anthony Nouman, Ahmad Athar, Bibi Chaand, Amirzadah Wareesha, Humayun Spogmay, Sajid Mehwish, Ashraf Zainab, Abid Maimoona, Khan Muhammad Hasnain, Yousafzai Zaland A
General Medicine, Rehman Medical Institue, Peshawar, PAK.
Internal Medicine, Rehman Medical Institute, Peshawar, PAK.
Cureus. 2021 Aug 25;13(8):e17424. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17424. eCollection 2021 Aug.
Introduction Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is defined as any degree of glucose intolerance with onset or first recognition during pregnancy. The diagnosis is made on the basis of the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) which according to the guidelines of ACOG regards a blood glucose level higher than 190mg/dL after the one-hour test as the criteria for GDM. The first-line agent for GDM is insulin injections; however, it has high costs and also causes its own feto-maternal complications which can include weight gain and polyhydramnios. On the contrary, metformin has fewer complications, is cheaper, and is emerging as a better alternative for the first-line agent for the treatment of diabetes mellitus type 2. GDM had a prevalence of 11.8% in the year 2018 in all trimesters of pregnancy in Pakistan. This study was thus conducted to determine the feto-maternal outcomes of non-GDM and GDM patients on insulin, metformin, and combined treatment respectively admitted to gynecology ward Rehman Medical Institute (RMI) Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan in the year 2019. Objectives To determine the feto-maternal outcomes in patients of GDM on metformin treatment and the feto-maternal outcomes in patients of GDM on insulin treatment and to compare the feto-maternal outcomes of mothers with GDM to those without GDM. Methodology This is a retrospective study conducted from January to April 2020 on patients of gestational diabetes mellitus undergoing either metformin, insulin, or both therapies admitted to the gynecology ward, Rehman Medical Institute (RMI). After getting ethical approval from the institutional ethical approval board, data were collected for the entire year of 2019 on the basis of proforma with the variables: demographic data, glycemic control (via OGTT), mode of labor, primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), and feto-maternal outcomes. Data was entered and analyzed via SPSS version 21.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) and the data were run through various tests including descriptive statistics, cross-tabulations, and chi-square. Results were formulated on the basis of these reports which were then presented in the form of graphs and tables. Results Out of 150 mothers who were admitted for delivery at the gynecology ward, 123 (82.0%) women were 30-40 years of age. Non-gestational diabetics patients were 78 (52%) whereas gestational diabetic mothers were 72 (48%); within these GDM-positive mothers 44 (61.1%) were on metformin, 21 (29.1%) were on insulin and seven (9.7%) were on combined treatment. Among modes of delivery, C-section was the most common (113 [76%]), mostly in non-GDM mothers (95 [45.1%]) followed by those on metformin treatment (36 [31.8%]). Considering fetal outcomes there was a significant association between NICU admissions, neonatal jaundice, and breech presentation with insulin-treated mothers (p=0.06, p=0.003, p=0.004, respectively CI=95%). Among maternal outcomes, there was a significant association between pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) and insulin-treated patients (p=0.02 CI=95%), premature rupture of membranes (PROM), and metformin-treated patients (p=0.01 CI=95%) whereas eclampsia was significantly associated with mothers not having GDM (p=0.001 CI=95%). Conclusion Based on this preliminary data and considering feto-maternal outcomes, metformin appears to be a safer drug as compared to insulin in the treatment of GDM with more compliance.
引言
妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)被定义为孕期出现或首次被识别出的任何程度的葡萄糖不耐受。诊断基于口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT),根据美国妇产科医师学会(ACOG)的指南,1小时试验后血糖水平高于190mg/dL被视为GDM的标准。GDM的一线治疗药物是胰岛素注射;然而,其成本高昂,还会引发自身的母婴并发症,包括体重增加和羊水过多。相反,二甲双胍并发症较少、价格更便宜,正逐渐成为治疗2型糖尿病一线药物的更好选择。2018年,巴基斯坦所有孕周的GDM患病率为11.8%。因此,本研究旨在确定2019年分别在巴基斯坦开伯尔-普赫图赫瓦省雷曼医学院(RMI)妇科病房接受胰岛素、二甲双胍及联合治疗的非GDM和GDM患者的母婴结局。
目的
确定接受二甲双胍治疗的GDM患者的母婴结局以及接受胰岛素治疗的GDM患者的母婴结局,并比较患有GDM的母亲与未患GDM的母亲的母婴结局。
方法
这是一项回顾性研究,于2020年1月至4月对雷曼医学院(RMI)妇科病房接受二甲双胍、胰岛素或两种疗法治疗的妊娠期糖尿病患者进行。获得机构伦理审批委员会的伦理批准后,根据表格收集了2019年全年的数据,变量包括:人口统计学数据、血糖控制情况(通过OGTT)、分娩方式、原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)以及母婴结局。数据通过SPSS 21.0版(IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows,IBM公司,纽约州阿蒙克)录入并分析,数据经过各种测试,包括描述性统计、交叉表和卡方检验。结果基于这些报告得出,然后以图表形式呈现。
结果
在150名入住妇科病房分娩的母亲中,123名(82.0%)女性年龄在30至40岁之间。非妊娠期糖尿病患者有78名(52%),而妊娠期糖尿病母亲有72名(48%);在这些GDM阳性母亲中,44名(61.1%)接受二甲双胍治疗,21名(29.1%)接受胰岛素治疗,7名(9.7%)接受联合治疗。在分娩方式中,剖宫产最为常见(113例[76%]),大多发生在非GDM母亲中(95例[45.1%]),其次是接受二甲双胍治疗的母亲(36例[31.8%])。考虑胎儿结局,入住新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)、新生儿黄疸和臀位与接受胰岛素治疗的母亲之间存在显著关联(p分别为0.06、0.003、0.004,CI = 95%)。在母亲结局方面,妊娠高血压(PIH)与接受胰岛素治疗的患者之间存在显著关联(p = 0.02,CI = 95%),胎膜早破(PROM)与接受二甲双胍治疗的患者之间存在显著关联(p = 0.01,CI = 95%),而子痫与未患GDM的母亲之间存在显著关联(p = 0.001,CI = 95%)。
结论
基于这些初步数据并考虑母婴结局,与胰岛素相比,二甲双胍在治疗GDM时似乎是一种更安全的药物,依从性更高。