Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.
Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2429428. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.29428.
Historically redlined neighborhoods may experience disinvestment, influencing their likelihood of gentrification, a process of neighborhood (re-)development that unequally distributes harms and benefits by race and class. Understanding the combined outcomes of redlining and gentrification informs how the mutually constitutive systems of structural racism and racial capitalism affect pregnancy outcomes.
To examine if historical redlining and contemporary gentrification is associated with increased severe maternal morbidity (SMM) odds.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study used data from a statewide population-based sample of all live hospital births at 20 weeks' gestation or more between 2005 and 2018 in California. Analysis was conducted from March 2023 to January 2024.
Redlining (as characterized by the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation mortgage security maps) and displacement (using present-day sociodemographic and housing market information).
Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to assess the association of census tract-level exposure to historical redlining and contemporary gentrification with increased SMM odds, adjusting for sociodemographic and pregnancy related factors. Outcome classification was based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention SMM index, which defines SMM as having any of the 21 procedures and diagnoses based on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes.
The study sample included 1 554 837 births (median [SD] maternal age, 29.0 [6.4] years; 3464 American Indian or Alaskan Native [0.2%], 224 774 Asian [14.5%], 132 240 Black [8.5%], 880 104 Hispanic [56.6%], 312 490 White [20.1%]), with 22 993 cases of SMM (1.4%). Residents in historically redlined neighborhoods that were undergoing gentrification or displacement were more likely to be Black, Hispanic, and American Indian or Alaskan Native. Independent of individual-level characteristics, SMM odds were greater for individuals living in redlined neighborhoods that experienced displacement (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.14-1.28) and in redlined neighborhoods undergoing gentrification (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.13-1.29) compared with those in continuously advantaged neighborhoods.
Findings from this cross-sectional study demonstrate that the legacies of redlining, intertwined with current dynamics of displacement and gentrification, affect SMM. Place-based sociopolitical mechanisms that inequitably distribute resources may be important intervention points to address structural drivers of adverse pregnancy outcomes and their racial inequities.
历史上的红线社区可能经历投资不足,影响其 gentrification 的可能性,gentrification 是一个邻里(重新)发展的过程,通过种族和阶级不平等地分配危害和利益。了解红线和 gentrification 的综合结果可以说明结构性种族主义和种族资本主义相互构成的系统如何影响怀孕结果。
研究历史上的红线和当代 gentrification 是否与增加严重产妇发病率(SMM)的几率有关。
设计、地点和参与者:本横断面研究使用了 2005 年至 2018 年期间加利福尼亚州所有 20 周妊娠或以上的全州人群基础样本中所有活产医院分娩的数据。分析于 2023 年 3 月至 2024 年 1 月进行。
红线(由联邦房主贷款公司抵押贷款安全地图描述)和流离失所(使用当前的社会人口统计学和住房市场信息)。
使用混合效应逻辑回归模型评估了普查区层面的历史红线和当代 gentrification 暴露与增加 SMM 几率之间的关联,调整了社会人口统计学和妊娠相关因素。结果分类基于疾病控制和预防中心 SMM 指数,该指数根据疾病和相关健康问题的国际统计分类,第九版和第十版代码,将任何 21 种程序和诊断定义为 SMM。
研究样本包括 1554837 名分娩(中位数[SD]产妇年龄,29.0[6.4]岁;3464 名美国印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民[0.2%],224774 名亚洲人[14.5%],132240 名黑人[8.5%],880104 名西班牙裔[56.6%],312490 名白人[20.1%]),22993 例 SMM(1.4%)。居住在经历 gentrification 或流离失所的历史红线社区的居民更可能是黑人、西班牙裔和美国印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民。独立于个体特征,居住在经历流离失所的红线社区的 SMM 几率(OR,1.21;95%CI,1.14-1.28)和经历 gentrification 的红线社区(OR,1.21;95%CI,1.13-1.29)高于居住在持续受益社区的居民。
这项横断面研究的结果表明,红线的遗留问题与当前的流离失所和 gentrification 动态交织在一起,影响了 SMM。不平等分配资源的基于地点的社会政治机制可能是解决不良妊娠结果及其种族不平等的结构性驱动因素的重要干预点。