• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Povidone Iodine vs Chlorhexidine Gluconate for Preoperative Skin Antisepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Santos Ana Clara Felix de Farias, Zamora Fernanda Valeriano, Galvao Lorhayne Kerly Capuchinho Scalioni, Pimenta Nicole Dos Santos, Cavalcante Deivyd Vieira Silva, Salles João Pedro Costa Esteves Almuinha, Hira Sara, Zamora Andres Villca

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, City University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Department of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais,Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2024 Sep 21. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.09.005.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2024.09.005
PMID:39313098
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection (SSI) remains a challenge in healthcare, contributing to prolonged hospital stays, increased healthcare costs, and adverse patient outcomes, including mortality. Effective preoperative skin disinfection interventions, such as povidone-iodine (PVI) and chlorhexidine (CHG), are widely used but their efficacy remains debated. To address this gap, this meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of PVI and CHG.

METHOD

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to June 2024 to identify studies comparing PVI versus CHG for preoperative skin antisepsis. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) for binary outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A random-effects model was used with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Data were analysed using R software (version 4.4.0), and heterogeneity was assessed using I statistics.

FINDINGS

Sixteen randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included, involving a total of 13,721 patients, among whom 6,836 (49.8%) received PVI. Compared to CHG, PVI was associated with a non-significant reduction in deep SSI (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.66 - 1.50; p = 0.994), but an increased risk of overall SSI (OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.06 - 1.48; p = 0.007) and superficial SSI (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.25 - 2.24; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

PVI as preoperative skin antisepsis demonstrated a non-significant reduction in deep SSI compared to CHG but was associated with an increased risk of overall and superficial SSI. Despite these findings, PVI remains an effective option, especially in resource-limited settings. Further research is needed to optimise its use and improve infection prevention strategies in clinical practice.

摘要

相似文献

1
Povidone Iodine vs Chlorhexidine Gluconate for Preoperative Skin Antisepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.
J Hosp Infect. 2024 Sep 21. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.09.005.
2
Does chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine preoperative antisepsis reduce surgical site infection in cranial neurosurgery?洗必泰和聚维酮碘术前消毒能否降低颅脑神经外科手术部位感染?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 Jul;98(6):405-8. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0143. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
3
Antisepsis of the skin before spinal surgery with povidone iodine-alcohol followed by chlorhexidine gluconate-alcohol povidone iodine-alcohol applied twice for the prevention of contamination of the wound by bacteria: a randomised controlled trial.脊柱手术前先用聚维酮碘 - 酒精进行皮肤消毒,随后用葡萄糖酸洗必泰 - 酒精,聚维酮碘 - 酒精应用两次以预防伤口细菌污染:一项随机对照试验。
Bone Joint J. 2017 Oct;99-B(10):1354-1365. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B10.BJJ-2017-0291.R1.
4
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preoperative Antisepsis with Combination Chlorhexidine and Povidone-Iodine.洗必泰与聚维酮碘联合用于术前抗菌的系统评价与Meta分析
Surg J (N Y). 2016 Aug 10;2(3):e70-e77. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1587691. eCollection 2016 Jul.
5
Preoperative skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone-iodine: a prospective analysis of 6959 consecutive spinal surgery patients.术前皮肤消毒用葡萄糖酸洗必泰和聚维酮碘的比较:6959 例连续脊柱手术患者的前瞻性分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Feb;28(2):209-214. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.SPINE17158. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
6
Multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled clinical trial comparing 2% chlorhexidine-70% isopropanol and 5% povidone iodine-69% ethanol for skin antisepsis in reducing surgical-site infection after cardiac surgery: the CLEAN 2 study protocol.多中心、开放标签、随机对照临床试验比较 2%洗必泰-70%异丙醇和 5%聚维酮碘-69%乙醇用于心脏手术后减少手术部位感染的皮肤消毒:CLEAN 2 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 17;9(6):e026929. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026929.
7
Alcohol-Containing Versus Aqueous-Based Solutions for Skin Preparation in Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.腹部手术中用于皮肤准备的含酒精溶液与水基溶液:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Surg Res. 2023 Nov;291:734-741. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.06.011. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
8
Systematic review and cost analysis comparing use of chlorhexidine with use of iodine for preoperative skin antisepsis to prevent surgical site infection.系统评价和成本分析比较氯己定与碘用于术前皮肤消毒以预防手术部位感染的效果。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Dec;31(12):1219-29. doi: 10.1086/657134. Epub 2010 Oct 22.
9
Skin preparation for preventing infection following caesarean section.剖宫产术后预防感染的皮肤准备
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 22;10(10):CD007462. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007462.pub4.
10
The Comparative Efficacy of Chlorhexidine Gluconate and Povidone-iodine Antiseptics for the Prevention of Infection in Clean Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.氯己定葡萄糖酸盐和聚维酮碘消毒剂预防清洁手术感染的比较疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):e481-e488. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004076.