Suppr超能文献

家庭医生制度对不同服务利用模式糖尿病患者的影响:基于群组轨迹建模的差分分析。

Impact of family doctor system on diabetic patients with distinct service utilisation patterns: a difference-in-differences analysis based on group-based trajectory modelling.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Sep 23;9(9):e014717. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014717.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study examines the impact of China's family doctor system (FDS) on healthcare utilisation and costs among diabetic patients with distinct long-term service utilisation patterns.

METHODS

Conducted in City A, eastern China, this retrospective cohort study used data from the Health Information System and Health Insurance Claim Databases, covering diabetic patients from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2019.Patients were categorised into service utilisation trajectories based on quarterly outpatient visits to community health centres (CHCs) and secondary/tertiary hospitals from 2014 to 2017 using group-based trajectory models. Propensity score matching within each trajectory group matched FDS-enrolled patients (intervention) with non-enrolled patients (control). Difference-in-differences analysis compared outcomes between groups, with a SUEST test for cross-model comparison. Outcomes included outpatient visits indicator, costs indicator and out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses.

RESULTS

Among 17 232 diabetic patients (55.21% female, mean age 62.85 years), 13 094 were enrolled in the FDS (intervention group) and 4138 were not (control group). Patients were classified into four trajectory groups based on service utilisation from 2014 to 2017: (1) low overall outpatient utilisation, (2) high CHC visits, (3) high secondary/tertiary hospital visits and (4) high overall outpatient utilisation. After enrolled in FDS From 2018 to 2019, the group with high secondary/tertiary hospital visits saw a 6.265 increase in CHC visits (225.4% cost increase) and a 3.345 decrease in hospital visits (55.5% cost reduction). The high overall utilisation group experienced a 4.642 increase in CHC visits (109.5% cost increase) and a 1.493 decrease in hospital visits. OOP expenses were significantly reduced across all groups.

CONCLUSION

The FDS in China significantly increases primary care utilisation and cost, while reducing hospital visits and costs among diabetic patients, particularly among patients with historically high hospital usage. Policymakers should focus on enhancing the FDS to further encourage primary care usage and improve chronic disease management.

摘要

简介:本研究考察了中国家庭医生制度(FDS)对具有不同长期服务利用模式的糖尿病患者医疗利用和成本的影响。

方法:本回顾性队列研究在中国东部城市 A 进行,使用了 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间来自健康信息系统和健康保险理赔数据库的数据。基于 2014 年至 2017 年社区卫生服务中心(CHC)和二级/三级医院每季度门诊就诊情况,使用基于群组的轨迹模型将患者分为服务利用轨迹。在每个轨迹组内,根据 FDS 参与情况(干预组)与非参与情况(对照组)对 FDS 参与情况进行倾向评分匹配。差异中的差异分析比较了各组之间的结果,并进行了交叉模型比较的 SUEST 检验。结果包括门诊就诊指标、成本指标和自付费用(OOP)。

结果:在 17232 名糖尿病患者(55.21%为女性,平均年龄 62.85 岁)中,13094 名患者参加了 FDS(干预组),4138 名患者未参加(对照组)。根据 2014 年至 2017 年的服务利用情况,患者被分为四个轨迹组:(1)低总体门诊利用率,(2)高 CHC 就诊,(3)高二级/三级医院就诊,(4)高总体门诊利用率。2018 年至 2019 年参加 FDS 后,高二级/三级医院就诊组 CHC 就诊次数增加 6.265 次(成本增加 225.4%),就诊次数减少 3.345 次(成本减少 55.5%)。高总体利用组 CHC 就诊次数增加 4.642 次(成本增加 109.5%),就诊次数减少 1.493 次。所有组的 OOP 费用均显著降低。

结论:中国的 FDS 显著增加了初级保健的利用和成本,同时减少了糖尿病患者的住院就诊次数和费用,尤其是那些历史上住院就诊次数较高的患者。政策制定者应专注于加强 FDS,以进一步鼓励初级保健的利用并改善慢性病管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48ad/11418535/78196c835df5/bmjgh-9-9-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验