• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受放化疗治疗的食管癌患者的体验:一项嵌套在 SCOPE2 试验中的定性研究。

The experiences of patients with oesophageal cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy treatment: a qualitative study embedded in the SCOPE2 trial.

机构信息

Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 23;14(9):e076394. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076394.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076394
PMID:39313288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11418518/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This qualitative study explored patients' experiences and perceptions of the SCOPE2 trial. SCOPE2 examined radiotherapy dose escalation in patients with inoperable oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT).

SETTING

Recruitment at five clinical sites in England and Wales, UK.

PARTICIPANTS

SCOPE2 trial participants were invited to take part in interviews from across five clinical sites. Participants self-selected to take part in up to three interviews across four different time points: baseline (before treatment) and at 2-3 months, 3-6 months or 6 months+ after baseline. There were five female and five male interview participants.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomised to standard dose dCRT prescribed carboplatin/paclitaxel or cisplatin/capecitabine, or an escalated dose dCRT prescribed carboplatin/paclitaxel or cisplatin/capecitabine.

METHODS

This qualitative study used semistructured longitudinal interviews to explore the impact of treatment on patient outlook and quality of life and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Interview data were thematically analysed.

RESULTS

10 patients participated in 16 longitudinal interviews. Three participants were accompanied by companions. Participants experienced side-effects from radiotherapy and chemotherapy including nausea, throat pain, difficulties eating and regaining appetite, thrombosis and fatigue, although most of these symptoms gradually improved. Participants required more ongoing information and support regarding treatment side-effects and cancer status in order to improve their overall quality of life. Best practice examples involved key contacts providing practical advice and signposting support.

CONCLUSION

Participants of the SCOPE2 trial reported short and longer-term side-effects from chemoradiotherapy, but these usually lessened over time. Participants attempted to be positive about their survival prospects by readjusting their expectations, priorities and lifestyles. Providing patients with ongoing opportunities to discuss detailed and timely information regarding treatment side-effects, aftercare and cancer status could improve the overall health and well-being of patients during oesophageal cancer trials and pathways.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02741856; ISRCTN: 97125464.

摘要

目的

本定性研究探讨了患者对 SCOPE2 试验的体验和看法。SCOPE2 研究了接受根治性放化疗(dCRT)治疗不可手术的食管癌患者的放疗剂量递增。

设置

在英国英格兰和威尔士的五个临床地点进行招募。

参与者

SCOPE2 试验的参与者被邀请在五个临床地点参加访谈。参与者自愿参加多达三次访谈,分为四个不同的时间点:基线(治疗前)和 2-3 个月、3-6 个月或基线后 6 个月以上。有 5 名女性和 5 名男性访谈参与者。

干预措施

参与者随机分配接受标准剂量 dCRT 规定的卡铂/紫杉醇或顺铂/卡培他滨,或递增剂量 dCRT 规定的卡铂/紫杉醇或顺铂/卡培他滨。

方法

本定性研究采用半结构式纵向访谈,探讨治疗对患者前景和生活质量的影响,以及 COVID-19 大流行的影响。对访谈数据进行了主题分析。

结果

10 名患者参加了 16 次纵向访谈。其中 3 名参与者有同伴陪同。参与者经历了放疗和化疗的副作用,包括恶心、喉咙痛、进食困难和食欲恢复、血栓形成和疲劳,尽管大多数这些症状逐渐改善。参与者需要更多关于治疗副作用和癌症状况的持续信息和支持,以提高他们的整体生活质量。最佳实践范例涉及关键联系人提供实用建议和提供支持。

结论

SCOPE2 试验的参与者报告了放化疗的短期和长期副作用,但随着时间的推移,这些副作用通常会减轻。参与者试图通过重新调整他们的期望、优先事项和生活方式来对他们的生存前景保持积极态度。为患者提供持续的机会,讨论有关治疗副作用、护理和癌症状况的详细及时信息,可能会提高患者在食管癌试验和治疗途径中的整体健康和幸福感。

试验注册号

NCT02741856;ISRCTN:97125464。

相似文献

1
The experiences of patients with oesophageal cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy treatment: a qualitative study embedded in the SCOPE2 trial.接受放化疗治疗的食管癌患者的体验:一项嵌套在 SCOPE2 试验中的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 23;14(9):e076394. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076394.
2
A qualitative study exploring participants' experiences of the SCOPE2 trial: chemoradiotherapy dose escalation in oesophageal cancer.一项探索参与者在SCOPE2试验(食管癌放化疗剂量递增)中的经历的定性研究。
Trials. 2025 Feb 26;26(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08768-z.
3
Outcome of Weekly Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-based Definitive Chemoradiation in Oesophageal Cancer in Patients Not Considered to be Suitable for Platinum-Fluoropyrimidine-based Treatment: A Multicentre, Retrospective Review.基于卡铂-紫杉醇的每周根治性放化疗治疗不适合铂类-氟嘧啶类治疗的食管癌患者的结果:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2020 Feb;32(2):121-130. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.09.058. Epub 2019 Oct 26.
4
A phase II trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in advanced oesophageal carcinoma.一项关于每周紫杉醇和顺铂同期放化疗治疗晚期食管癌的 II 期临床试验。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun;23(3):458-465. doi: 10.1007/s10147-018-1240-4. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
5
Health-related quality of life results from the PRODIGE 5/ACCORD 17 randomised trial of FOLFOX versus fluorouracil-cisplatin regimen in oesophageal cancer.PRODIGE 5/ACCORD 17食管癌FOLFOX与氟尿嘧啶-顺铂方案随机试验的健康相关生活质量结果。
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Oct;84:239-249. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.07.038. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
6
Comparison of 3 Paclitaxel-Based Chemoradiotherapy Regimens for Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.三种紫杉醇为基础的放化疗方案治疗局部晚期食管鳞癌患者的比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e220120. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0120.
7
Comparison of paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin (TP), carboplatin (TC) or fluorouracil (TF) concurrent with radiotherapy for patients with local advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a three-arm phase III randomized trial (ESO-Shanghai 2).比较紫杉醇联合顺铂(TP)、卡铂(TC)或氟尿嘧啶(TF)联合放疗治疗局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌患者的疗效:一项三臂 III 期随机试验(ESO-Shanghai 2)。
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 21;8(10):e020785. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020785.
8
Chemoradiotherapy Using Carboplatin plus Paclitaxel versus Cisplatin plus Fluorouracil for Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer.卡铂+紫杉醇化疗联合放疗与顺铂+氟尿嘧啶化疗联合放疗治疗食管或胃食管交界癌。
Oncology. 2021;99(1):49-56. doi: 10.1159/000510446. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
9
Comparison of definite chemoradiation therapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel or cisplatin/5-fluoruracil in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.比较卡铂/紫杉醇或顺铂/5-氟尿嘧啶在食管鳞状细胞癌患者中的确定性放化疗效果。
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Aug 2;13(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-1085-z.
10
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-Centre, open-label, randomized, controlled, clinical trial (HCHTOG1903).新辅助化疗与新辅助放化疗治疗局部晚期食管鳞癌:一项单中心、开放标签、随机、对照、临床研究(HCHTOG1903)。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Apr 15;20(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06824-2.

引用本文的文献

1
A qualitative study exploring participants' experiences of the SCOPE2 trial: chemoradiotherapy dose escalation in oesophageal cancer.一项探索参与者在SCOPE2试验(食管癌放化疗剂量递增)中的经历的定性研究。
Trials. 2025 Feb 26;26(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08768-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of early PET-CT directed switch to carboplatin and paclitaxel based definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with oesophageal cancer who have a poor early response to induction cisplatin and capecitabine in the UK: a multi-centre randomised controlled phase II trial.在英国,对诱导性顺铂和卡培他滨早期反应不佳的食管癌患者中,早期PET-CT引导下改用基于卡铂和紫杉醇的确定性放化疗的疗效:一项多中心随机对照II期试验。
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Jun 26;61:102059. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102059. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Late Toxicity and Health-Related Quality of Life Following Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.根治性放化疗治疗食管癌的迟发性毒性和健康相关生活质量:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023 Sep 1;117(1):31-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.05.025. Epub 2023 May 22.
3
Patient preferences for active surveillance vs standard surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer treatment: The NOSANO-study.在新辅助放化疗治疗食管癌后,患者对主动监测与标准手术的偏好:NOSANO 研究。
Int J Cancer. 2023 Mar 15;152(6):1183-1190. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34327. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
4
SCOPE 2 - Still Answering the Unanswered Questions in Oesophageal Radiotherapy? SCOPE 2: a Randomised Phase II/III Trial to Study Radiotherapy Dose Escalation in Patients with Oesophageal Cancer Treated with Definitive Chemoradiation with an Embedded Phase II Trial for Patients with a Poor Early Response using Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography.SCOPE2- 食管放疗仍有未解之题待回答吗?SCOPE2:一项旨在研究根治性放化疗联合氟尿嘧啶和顺铂治疗食管癌患者中放疗剂量递增的随机 2/3 期试验,对于早期反应不良的患者,该试验嵌入了使用正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描的 2 期试验。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2022 Jul;34(7):e269-e280. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.03.019. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
5
Cancer patients attending treatment during COVID-19: intolerance of uncertainty and psychological distress.癌症患者在 COVID-19 期间接受治疗:无法忍受不确定性和心理困扰。
J Cancer Surviv. 2022 Dec;16(6):1478-1488. doi: 10.1007/s11764-021-01126-3. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
6
Palliative radiotherapy combined with stent insertion to reduce recurrent dysphagia in oesophageal cancer patients: the ROCS RCT.姑息性放疗联合支架置入减少食管癌患者复发性吞咽困难:ROC 随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 May;25(31):1-144. doi: 10.3310/hta25310.
7
Loneliness and symptom burden in oncology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.孤独感和 COVID-19 大流行期间肿瘤患者的症状负担。
Cancer. 2021 Sep 1;127(17):3246-3253. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33603. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
8
Patients' Experiences With Illness, Treatment, and Decision-Making for Esophageal Cancer: A Qualitative Study in a Danish Hospital Setting.食管癌患者的疾病、治疗及决策体验:丹麦医院环境下的一项定性研究
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2020 Jun 29;7:2333393620935098. doi: 10.1177/2333393620935098. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
9
Radical esophagectomy for stage II and III thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma followed by adjuvant radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy: Which is more beneficial?根治性食管切除术治疗 II 期和 III 期胸段食管鳞癌,术后辅助放化疗:哪种更有益?
Thorac Cancer. 2020 Mar;11(3):631-639. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13307. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
10
Patients' quality of life during active cancer treatment: a qualitative study.癌症积极治疗期间患者的生活质量:一项定性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Oct 4;18(1):951. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4868-6.