Hearing Research Laboratory, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Medical Research Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Yonsei Med J. 2024 Oct;65(10):596-601. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0375.
This study aimed to assess the feasibility of the Apple AirPods Pro with the headphone accommodation feature as a hearing assistive device for patients with mild to moderate hearing loss (HL).
The study included a total of 35 participants with mild to moderate HL. To determine the degree of HL in the participants, a screening test using pure-tone audiometry was conducted prior to the main tests of functional gain, word recognition score (WRS), and sentence recognition in noisy environments. The study employed two hearing devices: the Bean (a personal sound amplification product, PSAP) and the AirPods Pro.
Regarding functional gain, there were no significant differences between the Bean and the AirPods Pro at all frequencies, except 8 kHz. In terms of WRS, both the Bean and the AirPods Pro had higher scores than the unaided condition. In sentence recognition, both the Bean and the AirPods Pro had higher scores than the unaided condition. During real-ear measurement, the Bean demonstrated consistent frequency responses, while the AirPods had a deviation exceeding 10 dB SPL at 6 kHz in the left ear. This deviation was absent for all other frequencies.
This study shows that the Apple AirPods Pro, with its headphone accommodation feature, performed similarly to a validated PSAP and improved hearing compared to unaided conditions.
本研究旨在评估具有耳机自适应功能的 Apple AirPods Pro 作为轻度至中度听力损失(HL)患者的助听设备的可行性。
该研究共纳入 35 名轻度至中度 HL 患者。在进行功能增益、单词识别得分(WRS)和噪声环境中的句子识别的主要测试之前,使用纯音测听进行了筛选测试,以确定参与者的 HL 程度。该研究使用了两种听力设备:Bean(个人声音增强产品,PSAP)和 AirPods Pro。
在所有频率(8 kHz 除外)下,Bean 和 AirPods Pro 的功能增益没有显著差异。在 WRS 方面,Bean 和 AirPods Pro 的得分均高于未助听状态。在句子识别方面,Bean 和 AirPods Pro 的得分均高于未助听状态。在真耳测量中,Bean 表现出一致的频率响应,而 AirPods 在左耳的 6 kHz 处偏差超过 10 dB SPL。所有其他频率均无此偏差。
本研究表明,具有耳机自适应功能的 Apple AirPods Pro 与经过验证的 PSAP 性能相似,并且与未助听状态相比,听力得到了改善。