Suppr超能文献

支持卓越面部识别能力的信息采样差异。

Information sampling differences supporting superior face identity processing ability.

作者信息

Dunn James D, Miellet Sebastien, White David

机构信息

School of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.

School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Apr;32(2):801-811. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02579-0. Epub 2024 Sep 23.

Abstract

Face recognition in humans is often cited as a model example of perceptual expertise that is characterized by an increased tendency to process faces as holistic percepts. However emerging evidence across different domains of expertise points to a critical role of feature-based processing strategies during the initial encoding of information. Here, we examined the eye-movement patterns of super-recognisers-individuals with extremely high face identification ability compared with the average person-using gaze-contingent "spotlight" apertures that restrict visual face information in real time around their point of fixation. As an additional contrast, we also compared their performance with that of facial examiners-highly trained individuals whose superiority has been shown to rely heavily on featural processing. Super-recognisers and facial examiners showed equivalent face matching accuracy in both spotlight aperture and natural viewing conditions, suggesting that they were equally adept at using featural information for face identity processing. Further, both groups sampled more information across the face than controls. Together, these results show that the active exploration of facial features is an important determinant of face recognition ability that generalizes across different types of experts.

摘要

人脸识别在人类中常被视为感知专长的典型例子,其特点是将面部作为整体感知进行处理的倾向增加。然而,不同专业领域中出现的证据表明,基于特征的处理策略在信息初始编码过程中起着关键作用。在这里,我们研究了超级识别者(与普通人相比具有极高面部识别能力的个体)的眼动模式,使用注视点相关的“聚光灯”孔径实时限制其注视点周围的视觉面部信息。作为额外的对比,我们还将他们的表现与面部检查人员(经过高度训练的个体,其优势已被证明严重依赖特征处理)的表现进行了比较。超级识别者和面部检查人员在聚光灯孔径和自然观看条件下都表现出同等的面部匹配准确性,这表明他们同样善于利用特征信息进行面部身份识别。此外,与对照组相比,两组在整个面部上采样的信息都更多。总之,这些结果表明,对面部特征的主动探索是面部识别能力的一个重要决定因素,这在不同类型的专家中具有普遍性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e24a/12000253/1056bd0e25c7/13423_2024_2579_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验