Huddleston John, Bedford Trevor
Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
medRxiv. 2024 Sep 13:2024.09.11.24313489. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.11.24313489.
For the last decade, evolutionary forecasting models have influenced seasonal influenza vaccine design. These models attempt to predict which genetic variants circulating at the time of vaccine strain selection will be dominant 12 months later in the influenza season targeted by vaccination campaign. Forecasting models depend on hemagglutinin (HA) sequences from the WHO's Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System to identify currently circulating groups of related strains (clades) and estimate clade fitness for forecasts. However, the average lag between collection of a clinical sample and the submission of its sequence to the Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data (GISAID) EpiFlu database is ~3 months. Submission lags complicate the already difficult 12-month forecasting problem by reducing understanding of current clade frequencies at the time of forecasting. These constraints of a 12-month forecast horizon and 3-month average submission lags create an upper bound on the accuracy of any long-term forecasting model. The global response to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic revealed that modern vaccine technology like mRNA vaccines can reduce how far we need to forecast into the future to 6 months or less and that expanded support for sequencing can reduce submission lags to GISAID to 1 month on average. To determine whether these recent advances could also improve long-term forecasts for seasonal influenza, we quantified the effects of reducing forecast horizons and submission lags on the accuracy of forecasts for A/H3N2 populations. We found that reducing forecast horizons from 12 months to 6 or 3 months reduced average absolute forecasting errors to 25% and 50% of the 12-month average, respectively. Reducing submission lags provided little improvement to forecasting accuracy but decreased the uncertainty in current clade frequencies by 50%. These results show the potential to substantially improve the accuracy of existing influenza forecasting models by modernizing influenza vaccine development and increasing global sequencing capacity.
在过去十年中,进化预测模型一直影响着季节性流感疫苗的设计。这些模型试图预测在疫苗株选择时流行的基因变异体,哪些将在疫苗接种活动针对的流感季节的12个月后占主导地位。预测模型依赖于世界卫生组织全球流感监测和应对系统的血凝素(HA)序列,以识别当前流行的相关毒株组(进化枝),并估计进化枝适应性以进行预测。然而,从采集临床样本到将其序列提交到全球共享所有流感数据倡议组织(GISAID)的EpiFlu数据库之间的平均延迟约为3个月。提交延迟通过减少预测时对当前进化枝频率的了解,使本就困难的12个月预测问题更加复杂。12个月预测期限和3个月平均提交延迟的这些限制为任何长期预测模型的准确性设定了上限。全球对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)大流行的应对表明,像信使核糖核酸(mRNA)疫苗这样的现代疫苗技术可以将我们需要预测的未来时间缩短至6个月或更短,并且扩大对测序的支持可以将提交到GISAID的延迟平均减少到1个月。为了确定这些最新进展是否也能改善季节性流感的长期预测,我们量化了缩短预测期限和提交延迟对甲型H3N2人群预测准确性的影响。我们发现,将预测期限从12个月缩短至6个月或3个月,平均绝对预测误差分别降至12个月平均值的25%和50%。减少提交延迟对预测准确性的提高不大,但将当前进化枝频率的不确定性降低了50%。这些结果表明,通过使流感疫苗开发现代化和提高全球测序能力,有可能大幅提高现有流感预测模型的准确性。