Vidoni Eric D, Grove George, Szabo-Reed Amanda N, Key Mickeal N, Huang Haiqing, Burns Jeffrey M, Hillman Charles H, Jakicic John M, Kang Chaeryon, Kramer Arthur F, McAuley Edward, Wan Lu, Hawes Tera, White Sydney S, Erickson Kirk I
University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
medRxiv. 2024 Sep 11:2024.09.10.24313352. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.10.24313352.
This study aimed to assess the incidence of adverse events (AE) in older adults participating in a year-long exercise intervention, investigating potential dose-response relationships between exercise intensity and AE frequency, and identifying demographic factors associated with AE risk.
A total of 648 older adults were randomized into one of three exercise groups: low-intensity stretching and toning (S&T), 150 minutes of aerobic exercise per week (150Ex), or 225 minutes of aerobic exercise per week (225Ex). Adverse events were tracked during the intervention, with event rates calculated based on participant adherence and time in the study. Generalized linear models were employed to compare AE incidence across groups. Post hoc comparisons were used to calculate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for AE between groups, adjusting for multiple comparisons.
Overall, 306 AE were reported, with 44% related to the intervention. No significant dose-response relationship was observed for all-cause AE between groups. However, intervention-related AE were more frequent in the aerobic exercise groups. Participants in the 150Ex group had a 77% higher rate of intervention-related AE compared to the S&T group, and the 225Ex group had an 88% higher rate. Higher adherence was associated with fewer all-cause AE, and greater comorbid burden was associated with more AE.
While aerobic exercise increased the risk of intervention-related AE, the overall risk remained low. Higher adherence to the exercise regimen was associated with fewer AE. These findings suggest aerobic exercise is generally safe in older adults, with the benefits outweighing the risks.
本研究旨在评估参与为期一年运动干预的老年人中不良事件(AE)的发生率,调查运动强度与AE频率之间潜在的剂量反应关系,并确定与AE风险相关的人口统计学因素。
总共648名老年人被随机分为三个运动组之一:低强度伸展和塑形(S&T)组、每周150分钟有氧运动(150Ex)组或每周225分钟有氧运动(225Ex)组。在干预期间跟踪不良事件,根据参与者的依从性和研究时间计算事件发生率。采用广义线性模型比较各组间的AE发生率。事后比较用于计算各组间AE的发生率比值(IRR),并对多重比较进行校正。
总体而言,共报告了306起AE,其中44%与干预有关。各组间全因AE未观察到显著的剂量反应关系。然而,有氧运动组中与干预相关的AE更为频繁。150Ex组参与者与干预相关的AE发生率比S&T组高77%,225Ex组高88%。更高的依从性与更少的全因AE相关,更高的共病负担与更多的AE相关。
虽然有氧运动增加了与干预相关的AE风险,但总体风险仍然较低。更高的运动方案依从性与更少的AE相关。这些发现表明,有氧运动在老年人中总体上是安全的,益处大于风险。